Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts for each. The complete summaries of all judgments are available on the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your legal fields.
8C_410/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding benefit cessation after accident
Summary of the facts
A.________ suffered a minor accident at work on 9 January 2023 with a traumatic brain injury without detectable structural or neurological injuries. The Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund (CNA) covered the treatment costs. However, from 26 April 2024 benefits were discontinued because a connection between the complaints and the accident was no longer assumed. The cantonal court dismissed an appeal against the benefit stop.
Summary of the considerations
- E.4: According to Art. 42 para. 1 and 2 BGG, appeals must justify the legal violation and explain how and why the contested decision is to be considered unlawful. Additionally, Art. 108 para. 1 lit. b BGG provides that insufficiently reasoned appeals may be declared inadmissible in simplified proceedings. - E.5: The cantonal lower court based its decision on medical expert reports from the CNA physician as well as further reports and concluded that no organic or natural causality between the complaints and the accident existed anymore. No adequate causality was found either. The appeal to the Federal Supreme Court did not meet the statutory reasoning requirements (Art. 42 para. 2 BGG) because the appellant did not sufficiently engage with the lower court's considerations. - E.6: Due to the circumstances, no court costs were charged (Art. 66 para. 1, second half-sentence, BGG).
Summary of the dispositive
The appeal is declared inadmissible, and no court costs are imposed.
7B_1249/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding embezzlement allegations
Summary of the facts
The appellant, a person residing in France and working in Geneva, received daily allowances from disability insurance from 1 May 2020. An overpayment of these daily allowances amounting to CHF 100,000 was paid out to her employer but not forwarded to her. She filed a criminal complaint and asserted various criminal allegations, including embezzlement (Art. 138 SCC). The public prosecutor's office and the criminal chamber dismissed the matter on the grounds that she was not to be regarded as a victim.
Summary of the considerations
The Federal Supreme Court examines its jurisdiction and the admissibility of the appeal ex officio. The appeal is basically admissible as it concerns a decision of the last cantonal instance in a criminal matter. The lower court rejected the appellant’s cantonal appeal as inadmissible because her status as a victim was denied pursuant to Art. 115 para. 1 CPC. The Federal Supreme Court declares itself competent to review this question. The appellant alleges a violation of her party rights. The lower court argued that it denied her victim status because the overpayment of the daily allowances only affected her employer and not her. According to the Federal Supreme Court, the appellant is neither the holder of the protected legal interest (Art. 138 SCC) nor directly affected. The substantive claim relates exclusively to the overpayment paid to her employer; she has no legal claim to it. The costs claimed by the appellant, such as attorney’s and health costs arising from the dispute, cannot be regarded as direct damages from the alleged criminal act. Consequently, the Federal Supreme Court concludes that the appellant cannot be considered a victim and therefore has no party standing.
Summary of the dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court dismisses the appeal and imposes the court costs on the appellant.
9C_431/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding suspension request in a tax procedure
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against an interim order of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Aargau dated 27 May 2026. This order concerned the non-compliance with the suspension request in a procedure concerning tax evasion of the cantonal and municipal taxes of the Canton of Aargau as well as the direct federal tax for the 2019 tax period. The appellant also asserted that over ten points raised by him should be decided within another procedure (delay/denial of justice) before a substantive decision is made.
Summary of the considerations
The Federal Supreme Court refers to the background of the tax procedure as well as various cantonal judgments and their summary in the proceedings before the Administrative Court. It examines the admissibility of the appeal and emphasizes that interim decisions are only contestable under certain conditions (Art. 93 para. 1 lit. a and b BGG). The appellant did not demonstrate a legal disadvantage that cannot be remedied. The Federal Supreme Court assesses the arguments regarding the ten points and the alleged breach of official duties. It concludes that these can be clarified in the main proceedings WBE.2026.81/WBE.2026.82, provided they are relevant to the outcome of the procedure. Since no irreparable disadvantage was demonstrated and no further condition of Art. 93 para. 1 BGG is met, the appeal is not admitted.
Summary of the dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court decided not to admit the appeal and imposed the court costs on the appellant. Furthermore, the judgment will be sent in writing to the parties and the Administrative Court.
6B_384/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding expulsion from the country
Summary of the facts
A.________, a Spanish national, was sentenced by the Zurich Higher Court to 14 months imprisonment with conditional execution and a fine of CHF 300 for qualified narcotics offenses (in particular Art. 19 para. 1 lit. c and d in conjunction with Art. 19 para. 2 lit. a as well as Art. 19a no. 1 Narcotics Act). Additionally, a five-year expulsion from the country was ordered. A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against the expulsion, alleging, in particular, violations of Art. 66a para. 2 SCC, Art. 13 and Art. 29 para. 2 BV, Art. 8 ECHR, and Art. 5 FZA.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_312/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding election of the members of the secondary school council
Summary of the facts
The government council of the Canton of Uri elected the members of the secondary school council for the 2024-2028 term. This election process was based, among other things, on insufficient publication, which led the appellant (A.________) to feel that his rights were violated. The Federal Supreme Court did not admit the first appeal in an earlier judgment and referred the matter back to the lower court. The lower court decided that the election procedure violated the principle of fair proceedings and the right to be heard but ruled that annulment of the election was not warranted. The appellant then filed a further appeal with the Federal Supreme Court alleging legal violations.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
4A_296/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding inadmissible decision of the civil chamber
Summary of the facts
A.________ filed an appeal against a decision of the Civil Chamber of the Geneva Cantonal Court, which declared the cantonal appeal against a first-instance decision of 26 January 2026 inadmissible. The first-instance decision granted the Caisse cantonale genevoise de compensation definitive legal opening over an amount of CHF 58,982.45.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_730/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding delay and denial of justice in debt enforcement proceedings
Summary of the facts
In connection with the seizure of a property of the appellant (debt enforcement no. xxx) and the instruction to the tenant of the property to pay rent to the debt enforcement office, the appellant filed various complaints. After dismissal by the Zofingen District Court (2 June 2026), he filed an appeal with the Aargau Higher Court. In parallel, he complained to the Federal Supreme Court about an alleged behavior of the Higher Court which he described as delay and denial of justice. Despite notifications and instructions on the correct form of the submission at the Federal Supreme Court, his multiple submissions regarding sufficient reasoning were not adequate.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
4D_94/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding suspensive effect in enforcement proceedings
Summary of the facts
The underlying case concerns an appeal by A.________ SA in liquidation against a decision of the president of the Court of Debt Collection and Bankruptcy of the Vaud Cantonal Tribunal dated 21 May 2026. The president had refused suspensive effect in an enforcement procedure. A.________ SA filed an appeal against this decision with the Federal Supreme Court without paying the prescribed advance on costs in time.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_842/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding denial of justice
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 28 August 2026 against an alleged denial of justice by the Zurich Higher Court. Later, she clarified that the appeal submitted was addressed to the Higher Court and that she actually intended to file an appeal against two legal opening judgments of the Higher Court with the Federal Supreme Court. The corresponding appeal was forwarded to the jurisdiction of the I. Civil Law Chamber (4D_163/2026 and 4D_165/2026). The appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal in the procedure 5A_842/2026 on 8 September 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
2C_186/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding exclusion from the master’s program
Summary of the facts
The appellant was enrolled as a student of the Master of Arts HES-SO in Social Work. Within the module "Master’s thesis" (TM1), her first submitted work was graded as "failed". Even after repeating the project in the following semester, she did not achieve the required grade. This resulted in a definitive failure and her exclusion from the study program. The appellant unsuccessfully contested this decision before several lower instances and finally turned to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
7B_1042/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding preventive detention
Summary of the facts
A.________ was accused of multiple offenses including property damage, threats, and disturbance of public order, which he claims to have committed without fault. The Solothurn-Lebern District Court ordered on 23 April 2026 a stationary therapeutic measure and preventive detention. An appeal against the detention order was dismissed. A.________ submitted further requests for release which were denied. Subsequently, on 19 August 2026, he filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting his immediate release from detention.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_408/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding insufficient reasoning
Summary of the facts
The appellant was convicted by the Geneva Police Court on 28 March 2025, among other things, for property damage, fare evasion, defamation, trespassing, and violation of a maintenance obligation and sentenced to a fine of 150 daily rates of CHF 30 each with a three-year probation period. The appellant’s appeal led to a very partial approval in the second cantonal instance (limiting the listed penal periods for two offenses), while the penalty was overall confirmed. The appellant filed a criminal appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting full acquittal of all charges.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_334/2026: Federal Supreme Court judgment on measures to protect the marital community
Summary of the facts
A.________ and B.________, both born in 1981, married in 2017 and have two children, C.________ (2019) and D.________ (2021). The marriage ended in January 2023 when the husband left the family home. On 25 January 2023, the wife filed an application with the court for provisional protective measures for the marital community, as she suspected the husband of sexual abuse against their daughter. The husband denied these allegations. The court provisionally granted sole custody of the children to the wife and prohibited the father from contacting them. Following a criminal complaint filed by the wife, criminal proceedings were initiated against the father. On 11 May 2023, the court issued further protective measures, including a temporary injunction allowing the father only restricted contact with his children and forbidding him from approaching the wife and children. These arrangements were later reviewed and partially adjusted by the court, leading to an appeal. The wife then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 20 April 2026. The father requested a more comprehensive regulation of personal contacts with his children, which was approved by the lower court before the wife filed an appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_349/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding correction of personal data
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ requested the correction of his personal data in an official file after a typographical error occurred in his first name in correspondence of the cantonal tribunal. Despite the correction by the cantonal court and the declaration that it was only an isolated error, the appellant demanded further measures which were rejected by the lower court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_54/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding higher remuneration as library supervisor
Summary of the facts
A.________ worked in various positions at the library of the University of B.________ between 2014 and 2024. For activities as "Surveillant de bibliothèque" (library supervisor), he was paid an hourly wage of 17.65 francs according to the cantonal directive of 2013. A.________ demanded retroactively higher remuneration for the period from 2019 to 2024 because, in his view, some of the tasks he performed as library supervisor were of higher value and required specific skills corresponding to the classification of an "Aide-bibliothécaire" (library assistant). The university as well as the cantonal administrative court rejected his claims.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_1015/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding legal aid in divorce proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant (A.________) applied for legal aid and the appointment of attorney Hanspeter Kümin as unpaid legal representative in divorce proceedings. The Winterthur District Court rejected this. Subsequently, the Zurich Higher Court also dismissed the request and the appellant’s appeal. With an appeal in civil matters and subsidiary constitutional complaint, the appellant requested the Federal Supreme Court to overturn the higher court’s decision and order the appointment of the desired legal counsel.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_279/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding conviction for crime under the Narcotics Act
Summary of the facts
The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Basel-Stadt sentenced A.________ on 29 January 2026 for a crime under the Narcotics Act to a suspended prison term of 2 years with a probation period of 3 years and an additional suspended fine. A.________ filed an appeal requesting acquittal of the crime charge and remittance of the matter for reassessment to the lower court. The case centers on the accusation that A.________ attempted to smuggle methamphetamine into Switzerland, which was found hidden in a train toilet.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_3/2026: Approval of the appeal concerning authorization for prosecution
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ applied to the indictment chamber of the Canton of St. Gallen (AK) to initiate prosecution against various persons in connection with his provisional detention and custodial placement following an incident in April 2023. The AK refused authorization, stating that most allegations had already been addressed in a previous decision of 15 February 2024. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court alleging, among other things, violations of his right to be heard because the 2024 decision was never served to him.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_371/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding expulsion from the country
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ was sentenced by the 2nd Criminal Chamber of the Bern Higher Court on 1 April 2026 for several offenses, including theft, trespassing, and violations of federal laws on foreigners and narcotics, to 13 months imprisonment. The sentence included a partial complementary sentence to previous judgments. Additionally, the Higher Court ordered a five-year expulsion from the country against the appellant, coupled with an entry in the Schengen Information System. The appellant challenged the expulsion with an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_828/2024: Non-admission of the appeal regarding employment without permit
Summary of the facts
A.________ was caught on 14 September 2020 during an inspection at a nail studio in Basel for employment without a permit according to Art. 115 para. 1 lit. c AIG. The single judge in criminal matters found her guilty (conditional fine of 10 daily rates) and the judgment was confirmed by the Court of Appeal. After remittance by the Federal Supreme Court, the lower court imposed a slightly reduced penalty (5 daily rates of CHF 10 with a two-year probation period) and rejected her claim for compensation. A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court alleging procedural deficiencies, lack of legal basis, and claiming an excusable error of law.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_324/2026: Dismissal of the appeal regarding debt restructuring suspension
Summary of the facts
The A.________ Sagl, a company in asset management, received a four-month provisional debt restructuring suspension from the first-instance court, which was extended by another four months. The provisional debt administrator found that no realistic restructuring plan or other procedure for a definitive debt restructuring suspension existed, whereupon the first-instance court revoked the suspension and declared bankruptcy. This decision was confirmed by the cantonal appellate instance. The A.________ Sagl filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting the annulment of the bankruptcy decision and the granting of a six-month definitive debt restructuring suspension.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
9C_404/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding negative conflicts of jurisdiction
Summary of the facts
The Federal Administrative Court had decided a negative conflict of jurisdiction in an AHV matter by affirming the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Obwalden. However, the Administrative Court of Obwalden denied its jurisdiction and referred the matter back to the Federal Administrative Court. After the deadline for contesting the cantonal decision expired, the Federal Administrative Court declared its original ruling final. The appellant then filed a denial of justice complaint with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting reopening of the procedure or a new decision.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_305/2024: Non-admission of the appeal regarding aircraft noise compensation and party compensation
Summary of the facts
The A.A.________ inheritance community claimed compensation for devaluation of their property due to excessive aircraft noise at Zurich Airport (introduction of the 4th wave). Although the property was sold in 2004, the compensation claim was retained with the seller by an additional agreement. The Federal Valuation Commission (ESchK) initially denied the expropriated parties compensation, assuming a change of party. The Federal Administrative Court overturned the first ESchK decision and granted the expropriated parties standing due to a defective party change. In a later decision, the ESchK awarded the expropriated parties compensation of CHF 589,252.--.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_983/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding multiple assaults as well as claims for compensation and damages
Summary of the facts
E.A.________ was sentenced by the Winterthur District Court on 16 November 2023 to imprisonment and a fine. The Zurich Higher Court acquitted him of the charges on 25 September 2025 or partially discontinued the proceedings and referred civil claims to civil court. E.A.________'s children filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court aiming to establish a conviction regarding the assaults and claims for compensation and damages or to remit the matter to the Higher Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_847/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding calculation of the subsistence minimum
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed an appeal against the calculation of the subsistence minimum by the Dorneck-Thierstein debt enforcement office. The supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy of the Canton of Solothurn found that the claim and corresponding costs were paid and dismissed the proceedings as moot because the appellant did not file any further submission within the set deadline. The appellant filed an appeal against this decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_435/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding challenge of alleged defects in the vote on the Food Initiative
Summary of the facts
The association 'Clean Water for All' and Franziska Herren requested corrections and rectifications regarding allegedly misleading information from the Federal Council and the Federal Chancellery in connection with the federal popular vote of 27 September 2026 on the Food Initiative. As an alternative request, they demanded postponement or invalidation of the vote. The Bern government council did not admit the appeals due to lack of jurisdiction. The appellants then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_835/2024: Partial approval of the appeal regarding crime under the Narcotics Act
Summary of the facts
A.________ was sentenced by the Bülach District Court on 28 March 2023 for a crime under the Narcotics Act and an offense under the Weapons Act to 45 months imprisonment and a fine. The Zurich Higher Court rejected the appellant's appeal on 27 June 2024 and confirmed the first-instance judgment. The appellant filed a criminal appeal against this judgment requesting acquittal, compensation, and shifting of costs.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
4D_139/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding crediting of payments on maintenance contributions
Summary of the facts
A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court against the judgment of the II. Civil Law Chamber of the Fribourg Cantonal Court dated 16 June 2026. This had previously confirmed the decision of the president of the Veveyse Civil Court, which granted partial definitive legal opening in a debt enforcement for an amount of CHF 10,000 plus interest. Disputed was, among other things, the crediting of payments on owed maintenance contributions.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
7B_1036/2026: Approval of the appeal regarding early enforcement of sentence
Summary of the facts
A.________ was sentenced by the Basel-Landschaft Criminal Court for qualified offenses under the Narcotics Act to 15 years imprisonment and expulsion from the country. He has been in custody since 2 February 2023. On 24 February 2026, A.________ requested early enforcement of sentence, which was initially denied due to risk of collusion. In an earlier Federal Supreme Court judgment (7B_588/2026), it was decided that the risk of collusion was unfounded and the case was remitted to the cantonal court for reassessment. The cantonal court approved the request but imposed indirect conditions on the enforcement modalities.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
2C_496/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding residence permit
Summary of the facts
After an unsuccessful asylum application, A.________ obtained a residence permit through marriage in 2007, later a settlement permit. Since 2013, he was no longer registered. In 2020, the settlement permit was revoked and a temporary residence permit was granted, which later also expired. In 2023, A.________ applied for a new residence permit, which the cantonal authorities rejected.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
7B_1022/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding delay in appeal proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ was sentenced in the first instance for multiple simple bodily injuries, coercion, insult, and threats to seven months imprisonment and a fine of 120 daily rates. He filed an appeal on 18 December 2024. Two years later, the St. Gallen Cantonal Court had not yet set a hearing date, citing high workload. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court alleging violation of the acceleration principle.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_883/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding land register correction
Summary of the facts
The appellant turned to the Federal Supreme Court to contest the registration of certain annotations in the land register regarding his property. He asserted that an objection had been filed which was not taken into account.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_363/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding the federal popular initiative "No 10-Million Switzerland!"
Summary of the facts
On 14 June 2026, the federal popular initiative "No 10-Million Switzerland! (Sustainability Initiative)" was rejected. Stephan Seiler filed a voting rights complaint alleging that Federal Councillor Beat Jans violated Art. 10a BPR and freedom of voting under Art. 34 para. 2 BV before the vote. His complaint was dismissed by the Solothurn government council due to non-admission as it was filed late and outside the jurisdiction of the government council.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_472/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding drug trafficking and criminal assessment
Summary of the facts
A.________ was convicted in June 2025 by the Criminal Court of the Canton of Geneva for a serious violation of the Narcotics Act (Art. 19 para. 1 lit. b, c, d and para. 2 lit. a, b LStup) and unauthorized entry (Art. 115 para. 1 lit. a LEI). He received a total prison sentence of ten years, including partial revocation of a previously granted suspended sentence, as well as expulsion from the country and entry in the Schengen Information System (SIS). The lower court, the Criminal Appeal and Revision Chamber of the Geneva Court of Justice, confirmed this judgment.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
7B_860/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding restoration of appeal deadline
Summary of the facts
The judgment concerns appellant A.________ who contested a decision of the Bern Higher Court dated 1 June 2026. The decision found that restoration of the deadline to file an appeal was excluded due to only slight personal fault of the appellant. The appellant filed an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court which did not meet formal requirements.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
4D_96/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding definitive legal opening of a claim
Summary of the facts
The appellants A.A. and B.A. filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint against a decision of the Court of Debt Collection and Bankruptcy of the Vaud Cantonal Tribunal dated 16 April 2026. The subject was the definitive legal opening of a claim of the Confederation in the amount of CHF 500 based on an earlier Federal Supreme Court decision of 10 June 2024.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
8C_712/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding advance on costs in accident insurance proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against a decision of the Schaffhausen Higher Court dated 11 November 2025. By an order, he was granted an extension until 18 August 2026 to pay an advance on costs. The appellant did not pay the advance even within this extension.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_156/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding facilitated naturalization
Summary of the facts
A.________, a Vietnamese national, submitted an application for facilitated naturalization in 2018 after marrying a Swiss citizen in Vietnam in 2012. During the application review, doubts were raised about the stability of the marital community, especially since A.________ had a child with another man, D.________, during the marriage. The State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) and the Federal Administrative Court (TAF) denied the application citing failure to meet legal requirements. The Federal Supreme Court addresses in this decision whether this denial was lawful.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
5A_796/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding collection of rental payments
Summary of the facts
On 20 February 2026, the Zofingen Regional Debt Enforcement Office seized a property belonging to the appellant. By letter dated 26 February 2026, the debt enforcement office requested the tenant to pay future rents directly to the office. The appellant filed an appeal against the collection of rents, which both the Zofingen District Court and the Aargau Higher Court dismissed due to formal defects.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
6B_290/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding standing and reasoning obligations in appeal proceedings
Summary of the facts
The judgment concerns the fire of a rental house allegedly caused by improper handling of ashes. The respondent B.________ was convicted by the Höfe District Court but acquitted in two instances by the Schwyz Cantonal Court. The Federal Supreme Court overturned the first acquittal due to lack of an oral hearing and remitted the case. After a renewed oral hearing, the Cantonal Court acquitted the respondent again. The appellant, as private plaintiff and owner of the rental house, requested annulment of this acquittal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_33/2025: Non-admission of the appeal regarding motocross track and building permit
Summary of the facts
The procedure concerns a motocross track in the municipality of Yverdon-les-Bains, which is partly located in the agricultural zone and partly in the forest zone. Although the track was originally put into operation provisionally in 1982, it still lacks a valid and legally compliant building permit. After repeated investigations by cantonal and municipal authorities, the operation was ordered to cease and the site to be restored. The affected landowners filed appeals against this order.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
9C_151/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding approval of the tariff structure agreement for outpatient medical services
Summary of the facts
The A.________ AG filed an appeal against a Federal Council decision of 5 November 2025 approving the amended tariff structure agreement for outpatient medical services. The Federal Administrative Court did not admit the appeal. A.________ AG filed an appeal against the non-admission decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
1C_453/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding driving license suspension
Summary of the facts
A.________ caused a traffic accident on 12 November 2024 in Lausanne in which a pedestrian was injured on a pedestrian crossing. As a result, the Service des automobiles et de la navigation of the Canton of Vaud revoked his driving license for three months by decision of 12 October 2025. After unsuccessful cantonal appeals, he brought the matter before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.
4F_23/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding revision and legal aid
Summary of the facts
The decision is based on a submission by the appellant A.________ requesting revision of the Federal Supreme Court judgment 4A_194/2026 of 1 June 2026. This judgment concerned an earlier appeal decision declared obviously inadmissible regarding definitive legal opening. Additionally, A.________ requested the immediate replacement of the presiding judge and applied for legal aid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found on the portal.