Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts. The full summaries of all judgments are available in the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments tailored to your legal areas.
6B_639/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning coercion in connection with climate demonstration
Summary of the facts
A.________ was convicted by the lower courts for his participation in an unauthorized climate demonstration in Zurich on October 4, 2021, during which he and other demonstrators blocked road traffic on a major traffic artery. He was sentenced to a conditional fine of 10 daily rates. The demonstration was organized by the group "Extinction Rebellion" to raise awareness of the climate crisis. Despite multiple police requests to end the blockade, A.________ remained on site.
Summary of the considerations
The appellant argued that the factual findings of the lower court were contradictory and that his freedom of action was justified by freedom of expression and assembly. Moreover, proof of a significant obstruction of traffic was lacking. The lower court found that the demonstration impaired traffic on an important traffic artery in Zurich, causing considerable delays for affected road users. The factual findings were deemed not arbitrary. The Federal Supreme Court confirms the fulfillment of the offense of coercion (Art. 181 Swiss Criminal Code). The traffic blockade constitutes "another restriction of freedom of action" that was sufficiently intense and exceeded the usual level of influence. The appellant acted intentionally. The restriction of the appellant’s freedom of expression and assembly was legally provided for, legitimate (e.g., to maintain road safety), and proportionate. A peaceful alternative, such as an authorized demonstration, would have been possible. The imposed penalty is low (conditional fine of 10 daily rates) and does not impose a disproportionate burden on the appellant. The scope of fundamental rights is not violated thereby. The appellant's request for compensation for the incurred detention was rejected.
Summary of the dispositive
The appeal against the lower court was dismissed and the court costs were imposed on the appellant.
4A_385/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning advance payment of costs
Summary of the facts
The appellants A.________ and D.________ filed an appeal against a judgment of the Geneva first-instance court on July 14, 2025. On July 3, 2026, the civil chamber of the Geneva judicial authority set a final deadline of July 10, 2026, for the appellants to pay the advance on costs. The court order was served on July 13, 2026. On July 14, 2026, the appellants filed two separate complaints before the Federal Supreme Court (cases 4A_381/2026 and 4A_385/2026) and requested reinstatement of the deadline according to Art. 148 CPC. On July 22, 2026, the civil chamber granted a new payment deadline, rendering the complaints moot.
Summary of the considerations
E.1: By decision of July 22, 2026, the civil chamber granted the appellants a new deadline for the payment of the advance on costs. For this reason, the complaint procedure 4A_385/2026 became moot. According to Art. 32 para. 2 BGG, the instructing judge decides as a single judge on the removal of such cases from the docket. E.2: Due to the special circumstances of the case, court costs are waived (Art. 66 para. 1 in fine BGG). No party compensation is awarded.
Summary of the dispositive
The procedure is declared moot and removed from the docket. No court costs or party compensations are charged.
7B_759/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning summons to serve a custodial sentence
Summary of the facts
The appellant was summoned by the Department of Justice and Reintegration of the Canton of Zurich to serve substitute custodial sentences totaling 278 days. After a request for clarification, the competent justice directorate decided to consider the procedure completed as the appellant did not submit a timely declaration on whether he intended to appeal. The Zurich Administrative Court annulled this decision and referred the matter back to the Justice Directorate for substantive consideration.
Summary of the considerations
The Federal Supreme Court clarifies that only the judgment of the Administrative Court dated May 15, 2026, is the subject of the proceedings. To the extent that the appellant raises other issues, they are not addressed. According to Art. 42 BGG, an appeal must contain a request and sufficient reasoning. The appellant does not show how the challenged decision of the Administrative Court is erroneous, neither factually nor legally. Due to the obvious lack of reasoning, the appeal is not admitted in the simplified procedure pursuant to Art. 108 BGG.
Summary of the dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court has decided not to admit the appeal and dismissed the request for legal aid. The court costs are imposed on the appellant.
8C_647/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning accident insurance and causal link
Summary of the facts
The appellant, a project and construction manager born in 1967, suffered several accident-related injuries and resulting complaints, including injuries to the right knee and emerging pain issues. Despite retraining as a vocational school teacher through the disability insurance and several years of treatment, Suva denied later benefit claims (disability pension and additional compensation for impairment). With an objection decision dated May 3, 2023, Suva upheld this, which was confirmed by the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
4A_381/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning mootness
Summary of the facts
A.________ and D.________ filed an appeal on July 14, 2025, against a judgment of the Tribunal de première instance genevois dated June 13, 2025. The Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of the Canton of Geneva ordered them by decision of July 3, 2026, to pay the required advance on costs by July 10, 2026, at the latest, otherwise the appeal would be declared inadmissible. Despite an extension of the deadline by the Cantonal Court, the advance was not paid in time.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_891/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-prosecution order
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ filed several criminal complaints against state and private entities, alleging procedural and substantive violations, especially relating to the deprivation of custody rights over his daughter. The Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Aargau did not take up the criminal case and did not grant legal aid. The Aargau Higher Court also did not admit the appeal against this and rejected the legal aid request, imposing the costs on the appellant.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_940/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning request for release from custody
Summary of the facts
B.A.________ is accused of having fired shots on April 26, 2025, together with his nephew at a vehicle of the D.________ family, injuring one person. The incident highlights a longstanding feud between the families. B.A.________ has been held in pre-trial detention since his arrest on the evening of the act, repeatedly extended due to flight risk. A request for release from custody was rejected by the Measures Court of the Canton of Aargau, and the Appeal Chamber of the Aargau Higher Court confirmed this.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_776/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning criminal complaint
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ filed a criminal complaint against unknown perpetrators at the Solothurn Public Prosecutor's Office. On April 20, 2026, the Prosecutor ordered the non-prosecution of the complaint. A.________ appealed to the Solothurn Higher Court, which on May 15, 2026, did not admit the appeal. In the title of his submission to the Federal Supreme Court, A.________ raised allegations concerning murder, organized fraud, and child abuse.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_6/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning compulsory insurance of A.________ GmbH at Suva
Summary of the facts
A.________ GmbH, based in U.________, provides building owner representation and construction-related services. Suva subjected the company to compulsory accident insurance from January 1, 2023. An objection decision of Suva and a complaint to the Federal Administrative Court were dismissed. A.________ GmbH disputed the insurance coverage, arguing it was not a technical operation within the meaning of Art. 66 para. 1 lit. m UVG, and requested a reassessment.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
1C_235/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning building permit for area development
Summary of the facts
The Meilen building authority approved in 2021 the construction of four multi-family houses as an area development project. The cantonal authorities, including the building appeals court and the administrative court, confirmed the permit, adding ancillary provisions. The appellants, neighbors of the project, oppose these decisions due to alleged violations of building and planning law, especially regarding access and building conformity.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_269/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning benefits for health insurance premium coverage
Summary of the facts
The cantonal compensation office AVS/AI/IPG in the Canton of Ticino decided to grant benefits for health insurance premium coverage to the spouse and minor child of A.________ from March 1, 2024, applying a hypothetical income to the spouse. The Ticino Insurance Court annulled this decision and remanded the matter to clarify relevant facts, particularly the professional and health status of the spouse, and to issue a new supplementary benefits decision from January 1, 2023. The compensation office filed a complaint to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_632/2023: Non-admission of the appeal concerning coercion at unauthorized demonstration
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ participated on October 4, 2021, in an unauthorized sit-in blockade organized by "Extinction Rebellion" at Uraniastrasse in Zurich. The demonstration temporarily blocked a heavily trafficked road for motorized traffic. After participants did not leave despite multiple police requests, the police dissolved the action at 1:25 p.m. The Zurich District Court convicted A.________ of coercion under Art. 181 Swiss Criminal Code and imposed a conditional fine of seven daily rates of CHF 30 (two daily rates counted as served by detention). The Zurich Higher Court confirmed this judgment. A.________ requested acquittal before the Federal Supreme Court, invoking freedom of expression and assembly.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_762/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning recusal procedure
Summary of the facts
The appellant, who had previously repeatedly asserted the recusal of a district judge, demanded the annulment and repetition of all official acts of the relevant judge. The District Court and the Cantonal Court of St. Gallen concluded that the appellant's request had already been followed by opening a new recusal procedure. The Federal Supreme Court deals with the subsequent appeal against the decision of the Cantonal Court of St. Gallen.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_115/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning security for legal costs
Summary of the facts
The appellant wife (A.________) requested in a civil dispute (annulment of divorce judgment) from her ex-husband (B.________) the provision of security for legal costs (Art. 99 CPC). The ex-husband, imprisoned in a Russian penal camp, opposed this. The request of the appellant wife was rejected in the first instance and by the Court of Justice of the Canton of Geneva.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_825/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning dismissal order by the public prosecutor's office
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed a criminal appeal against the decision of the Zurich Higher Court, which partially lifted a dismissal order regarding the accusation of theft and referred the case back to the public prosecutor's office for a new decision. The appeal was otherwise dismissed. The Higher Court also denied the appellant legal aid.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_658/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning coercion at unauthorized demonstration
Summary of the facts
A.________ participated on October 5, 2021, in an unauthorized demonstration by the group "Extinction Rebellion" on the Rudolf-Brun-Bridge in Zurich. Participants blocked individual traffic. Despite police warnings to clear the street, A.________ remained on the roadway until his arrest at 1:10 p.m. The Zurich Higher Court convicted A.________ of coercion and sentenced him to a conditional fine.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
4A_312/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning missed appeal deadline
Summary of the facts
A.________ was ordered by the Meilen District Court on March 25, 2026, to hand over a vehicle with associated documents and keys to C.________, otherwise enforcement would be ordered. A.________ appealed to the Zurich Higher Court and simultaneously requested reinstatement of the appeal deadline. The Higher Court rejected the request and did not admit the late appeal. Subsequently, A.________ and B.________ GmbH filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_342/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning coercion at unauthorized demonstration
Summary of the facts
A.________ participated on October 4, 2021, in an unauthorized demonstration in Zurich, during which a road blockade was carried out on Uraniastrasse. This action caused significant traffic disruptions. The Bern-Mittelland Regional Court acquitted A.________ of coercion but convicted him of traffic law violations and disobedience to official orders. On appeal by the public prosecutor, the Bern Higher Court convicted A.________ of coercion among other charges. He appeals this conviction to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
1C_514/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning provisional withdrawal of driver's license
Summary of the facts
A.________, who had previously been subject to driver's license withdrawals for moderate and minor offenses, drove a vehicle in an impaired condition on August 1, 2022. The Aargau Road Traffic Office ordered on November 4, 2022, a provisional withdrawal and a traffic medical examination. Subsequently, a definitive indefinite withdrawal was ordered on July 21, 2023, which was confirmed by the Department of Economic Affairs and the Interior (DVI) and the Aargau Administrative Court. A later traffic medical report contested A.________'s fitness to drive.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_746/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning right to confrontation and rejected convictions
Summary of the facts
A.________ was sentenced by the Kreuzlingen District Court on October 6, 2022, inter alia for receiving stolen goods, money laundering, and serious traffic violations to a conditional prison sentence of ten months. On appeal, the Thurgau Higher Court reduced the sentence to a conditional fine of 180 daily rates at CHF 120 each and convicted A.________ of receiving stolen goods, money laundering, and serious traffic violations. A.________ requested the Federal Supreme Court to annul the Higher Court's prior decisions.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9C_469/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning disability pension
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________, born in 1961, registered with the IV office Bern in 2021 for benefits due to a health event (aortic rupture with brain hemorrhages). After medical and occupational investigations, her application for a disability pension was rejected by decision of May 2, 2024. The Bern Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against this decision on June 26, 2025. The appellant then filed an appeal in public law matters to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_951/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning recusal and inadmissible submissions
Summary of the facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on an appeal by A.________ against a decision of the Aargau Higher Court. On July 13, 2026, the Higher Court did not admit an appeal by the appellant, nor a recusal request against the presiding judge. The appellant then filed an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7F_26/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revision of the judgment
Summary of the facts
The petitioner, A.________, requested revision of the non-final Federal Supreme Court judgment of March 30, 2026 (7B_225/2026, 7B_226/2026, 7B_227/2026, 7B_239/2026), which had not admitted his appeals against several decisions of the St. Gallen indictment chamber.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
4A_184/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning service of a legal enforcement title
Summary of the facts
The appellant, A.________ AG, was held liable by the Social Insurance Institution of the Canton of St. Gallen for outstanding wage contributions from 2019-2022. After an objection against the related recovery order and its rejection, the appellant argued that the objection decision was not properly served. Based on this decision, the social insurance institution obtained definitive legal enforcement, after which the appellant filed an appeal.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_773/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning penalty order for fare evasion
Summary of the facts
A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court against the decision of the St. Gallen indictment chamber of June 3, 2026, which did not admit his complaint concerning a penalty order for fare evasion. The penalty order became final due to his unexcused absence from the main hearing.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_758/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning penalty order
Summary of the facts
The Nidwalden Public Prosecutor's Office issued on June 11, 2025, a penalty order against the appellant for assault and imposed a fine of CHF 300. The private plaintiff's civil claim was referred to civil proceedings. After the appellant's objection, the Public Prosecutor's Office transferred the penalty order to the Nidwalden Cantonal Court, which discontinued the proceedings on February 5, 2026, as the appellant withdrew the objection, and declared the penalty order final. The private plaintiff's appeal to the Nidwalden Higher Court was dismissed. The appellant then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
1C_465/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning termination of employment of a police officer
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________, a police officer in the Nyon region, was dismissed effective May 31, 2023, because his employer (Police Nyon Région) considered his behavior to have caused a sustainable breach of trust. He challenged the dismissal before the Administrative and Public Law Court of the Canton of Vaud (CDAP), which ultimately declared itself incompetent as the employment contract was regarded as a valid administrative contract. A.________ then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_550/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning advance payment of costs
Summary of the facts
A.________ appealed against the decision of the Aargau Higher Court, Criminal Chamber, which confirmed non-admission of his objection to a penalty order. The Federal Supreme Court decided on this appeal.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
4A_267/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal aid
Summary of the facts
The appellant, A.________, challenged the denial of legal aid by the lower court, which justified this by the lack of prospects of success of his appeal. The Federal Supreme Court examined the admissibility and reasoning of the appeal as well as a request for legal aid for the Federal Supreme Court proceedings.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9C_274/2025: Upholding of the appeal concerning retroactive compensation for helplessness
Summary of the facts
A child born in 2014 applied in 2018 through its parents for medical measures from the Disability Insurance (IV) due to a diagnosed autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In 2024, an additional IV compensation for helplessness was requested. The IV office of the Canton of Geneva granted compensation for moderate helplessness retroactively for one year from the application date, which the parents challenged. The lower court granted retroactive compensation from May 2019. The IV office appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_675/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning coercion at climate rally
Summary of the facts
A.________ participated on October 4, 2021, in a peaceful but unauthorized climate rally on the roadways of Uraniastrasse in Zurich. The action caused a traffic blockade. A.________ was convicted by the Zurich District Court of coercion (Art. 181 Swiss Criminal Code) and sentenced to a conditional fine of 15 daily rates of CHF 90 each. This judgment was confirmed by the Zurich Higher Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_765/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning criminal assessment of climate protests
Summary of the facts
A.________ was convicted for multiple coercions (Art. 181 Swiss Criminal Code) and disruption of a public service (Art. 239 para. 1 Swiss Criminal Code). The charges related to participation in unauthorized climate demonstrations on June 20, 2020 (Quaibrücke) and October 4, 2021 (Uraniastrasse) in Zurich, which blocked traffic. The Zurich District Court imposed a conditional fine, and the Zurich Higher Court increased the daily rate amount.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
1C_260/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning rezoning of properties
Summary of the facts
The municipality of Schwarzenberg has approximately 5.1 hectares of oversized building zones, which are to be reduced according to a cantonal rezoning strategy. A.________ AG owns two properties (nos. 1301 and 1372) in the Eigenthal district, which were rezoned by the Lucerne Cantonal Council due to their peripheral location. The voters of Schwarzenberg opposed this rezoning in a ballot. A.________ AG appealed the rezoning at the cantonal level but lost before the Lucerne Cantonal Court. It then filed a public law appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_936/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning withdrawal of appeal
Summary of the facts
A.A. was sentenced by the Uster District Court on July 5, 2024, for multiple neglects of maintenance obligations to a conditional fine and a fine. A.A. and the private plaintiff B.A. filed appeals. The private plaintiff withdrew her appeal while A.A. pursued the procedure. An appeal hearing was scheduled for October 15, 2025. Two days before the hearing, A.A.'s lawyer requested a written procedure, which was denied. A.A. and his lawyer did not appear at the hearing. The Higher Court considered the absence as withdrawal of the appeal and discontinued the procedure as resolved.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7F_20/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revision of judgments
Summary of the facts
A.________ requested revision of two Federal Supreme Court judgments (7B_505/2025 of August 18, 2025, and 7F_40/2025 of March 13, 2026). The background is various complaints related to a case of document seizure ordered by the Federal Tax Administration (AFC) and examined by the Criminal Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court. Both earlier complaints were declared inadmissible.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_1106/2023: Non-admission of the appeal concerning recusal request and multiple coercion
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ was convicted of multiple coercions (Art. 181 Swiss Criminal Code) and disruption of operations serving the public (Art. 239 para. 1 Swiss Criminal Code). This occurred in connection with his participation in two climate demonstrations by the group "Extinction Rebellion" in Zurich, which blocked main traffic arteries. The Zurich Higher Court confirmed the conviction and increased the sentence compared to the first-instance conviction (contested fine: 30 daily rates of CHF 30 each). A.________ appealed the judgment and the decision rejecting a recusal request against a senior judge.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_201/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning attempted grievous bodily harm and expulsion order
Summary of the facts
A.________ was convicted by the Thal-Gäu District Court President for attempted grievous bodily harm to a conditional prison sentence of 10 months, with no expulsion ordered. On appeal by the private plaintiff and the public prosecutor, the Solothurn Higher Court increased the prison sentence to 14 months conditional, extended the probation period to four years, ordered a five-year expulsion, and registered it in the SIS. A.________ filed a criminal appeal seeking confirmation of the first-instance judgment’s finality or at least annulment of the expulsion and its registration.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_335/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning attempted murder and sentencing
Summary of the facts
A.________ was charged by the Zug Public Prosecutor’s Office for an attack on B.________ on September 1, 2023, during which he allegedly struck with a hammer and repeatedly attacked the victim’s left upper body with a knife. According to the lower court, the motive was the will to kill the husband of the woman with whom A.________ had a relationship to start a relationship with her himself. The Zug Criminal Court convicted A.________ of attempted murder to 14 years imprisonment; the Zug Higher Court increased the sentence to 15 years. A.________ denied the intent to kill and appealed the judgment to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_269/2026: Federal Supreme Court judgment on expulsion due to sexual offenses
Summary of the facts
The Zurich Higher Court convicted A.________ on January 8, 2026, of sexual coercion, sexual acts with a child, multiple attempted sexual acts with children, and sexual harassment to a prison sentence of 38 months and a fine of CHF 1,000. It also ordered a lifelong occupational ban and a residential therapeutic measure for the treatment of psychological disorders, while postponing the execution of the prison sentence. The prior outpatient measure was lifted, and a five-year expulsion with registration in the Schengen Information System was ordered. A.________ appealed this decision and requested that the expulsion not be pronounced.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_683/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-prosecution
Summary of the facts
The appellant challenged a decision of the Bern Higher Court which dismissed an appeal against the non-prosecution order of the Regional Public Prosecutor's Office Jura-Seeland. The appellant also applied for legal aid.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_538/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning procedural incapacity
Summary of the facts
The case centers on an inheritance dispute between A.________ (appellant) and B.________ (respondent). The lower court treated a submission by A.________ labeled as a "recourse" as an appeal and dismissed it as inadmissible due to insufficient reasoning and missed deadline. The appellant argues before the Federal Supreme Court that the lower court should have determined her procedural incapacity under Art. 69 para. 1 CPC and appointed her a lawyer.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
4D_113/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning payment order over CHF 2,700
Summary of the facts
A.________ appealed against a payment order by B.________ SA for CHF 2,700. The Giudice di pace of the Mendrisio district provisionally rejected A.________'s objection on October 21, 2025. The Enforcement and Bankruptcy Chamber of the Ticino Court of Appeal dismissed A.________'s complaint against this decision on May 21, 2026, as far as it was admitted. A.________ filed with the Federal Supreme Court on May 28, 2026, but withdrew the appeal on July 9, 2026.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_580/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-prosecution order
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed a submission against the decision of the indictment chamber of the St. Gallen Cantonal Court of May 7, 2026, which confirmed the public prosecutor's non-prosecution order and did not admit the appellant's appeal. The submission was initially mistakenly filed with the Federal Criminal Court before being forwarded to the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_863/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning sentencing and violation of the right to be heard
Summary of the facts
A.________ was sentenced in a multi-stage procedure for murder and other offenses to 19 years imprisonment. The Federal Supreme Court partially upheld a first appeal, remanded the case to the lower court, and requested new considerations on sentencing. After renewed assessment by the Higher Court, A.________ filed a new appeal, especially challenging the binding effect of the remand decision, sentencing, and an alleged violation of the acceleration requirement.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_898/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning extension of pre-trial detention
Summary of the facts
A.A.________ and B.A.________ are suspected of co-perpetrated multiple attempted intentional killings or attempted murders and other offenses. The incident includes shootings on persons involved in a family conflict. A.A.________ has been in custody since the incident on April 26, 2025. The appellant requested release from detention or, alternatively, ordering substitute measures. The Aargau Higher Court rejected the appeal against the extension of pre-trial detention.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_121/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning disability pension
Summary of the facts
A.________ has received a full disability pension since 2003. Following police reports in 2016 and 2022, the Zurich IV office initiated a pension revision procedure. A multidisciplinary report (Medas, 2023) resulted in retroactive revocation of the pension from October 2016 and the order to recover unduly received benefits. The lower court (Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich) confirmed this order.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
2C_300/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning extension of deportation detention
Summary of the facts
The Ukrainian citizen A. (born 1982) entered Switzerland in 2022 and received temporary protection. On January 27, 2026, he was convicted for organized money laundering, fraud, and other offenses; a partially conditional prison sentence of 36 months and a seven-year expulsion order were pronounced against him. Due to the expulsion order, A. was taken into deportation detention on January 27, 2026. The detention was later extended until July 26, 2026. A. unsuccessfully challenged this extension before the Bern Administrative Court and then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The complete summary of the judgment is available in the portal.