Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (BGer) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries with facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts in each case. The full summaries of all judgments are available in the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your areas of law.
7B_534/2026: Non-admission of the appeal regarding procedural security
Summary of the facts
The Public Prosecutor's Office II of the Canton of Zurich decided by order of 26.03.2026 not to initiate an investigation into attempted murder. Against this order, A.________ filed an appeal with the Zurich Cantonal Court. The Cantonal Court ordered the appellant by order of 15.04.2026 to provide a procedural security of CHF 2,000, under threat of non-admission of the appeal. The appellant then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the considerations
- E.1: The subject matter of the federal proceedings is exclusively the order of the Cantonal Court dated 15.04.2026; grievances raised outside this scope are inadmissible. - E.2: According to Art. 42 BGG, requests and reasoning must be formulated. The requirements for the grounds of appeal include in particular a specific criticism of the contested decision. The appellant's complaints are insufficiently substantiated. - E.3: The obligation to provide procedural security according to Art. 383 para. 1 CPC is lawful. The appellant does not demonstrate in what way the decision of the lower court is factually or legally incorrect; there is no evidence of an application for legal aid before the lower court. - E.4: Due to the lack of reasoning, the appeal is obviously insufficient and therefore inadmissible. - E.5: The appeal is not admitted in simplified proceedings. The appellant bears the costs of the proceedings. The application for legal aid is dismissed due to lack of prospects of success.
Summary of the dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court did not admit the appeal and dismissed the application for legal aid. The costs of the proceedings were imposed on the appellant.
8C_529/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning disability insurance
Summary of the facts
The appellant, who has claimed a disability pension since the consequences of a brain hemorrhage in 2010, applied in 2022 after an accident (fracture of the left upper arm) for a revision of her pension entitlement. The IV office of the Canton of Aargau ordered a temporary increase from half to a full disability pension and a subsequent reduction. The cantonal insurance court rejected the appeal filed against this decision. The appellant essentially requests before the Federal Supreme Court a remand for additional medical examinations.
Summary of the considerations
The Federal Supreme Court examines the alleged legal violations based on Art. 95 et seq. BGG (Federal Supreme Court Act) and only corrects manifestly incorrect factual findings of the lower court ex officio. The dispute concerns the assessment of the appellant's ability to work, particularly since March 2023. The lower court relied on earlier medical assessments. The Federal Supreme Court finds that the medical evaluations of the RAD doctor were insufficient to adequately consider the neuropsychological findings from 2023/24 onwards. These indicate possible deteriorations not covered by earlier reports (e.g., 2018). Further medical opinions (e.g., Dr. D.________ and PD Dr. G.________) also show that the evidence was incompletely examined. In particular, the principle of investigation was violated, as a multidisciplinary expert assessment was necessary. The case is therefore to be remanded for supplementary medical investigations. The cost coverage for a privately obtained neuropsychological report is rejected, as it was not indispensable for the decision. The remand constitutes a full success of the appellant regarding cost allocation and party compensation.
Summary of the dispositive
The appeal is partially upheld, the judgment of the lower court is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the IV office for additional medical examinations. The court costs are imposed, and the appellant receives compensation.
6B_650/2024: Non-admission of the appeal regarding cost decision and compensation in Covid-19 violations
Summary of the facts
A.________ was fined CHF 700 by the single judge of the Schwyz district court for violations of the Covid-19 ordinance and official orders and was charged half of the procedural costs. On appeal, the Schwyz cantonal court acquitted A.________ on all counts but imposed half of the procedural costs on him. The Federal Supreme Court partially upheld an appeal against this judgment and remanded the matter regarding the cost decision to the cantonal court. In its new decision of 27 June 2024, the cantonal court upheld the half-cost allocation. A.________ appealed this decision again to the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the considerations
E.1: The cantonal files were consulted. The appellant's request for file consultation is thus fulfilled. E.2: Regarding dispositive point 1 of the cantonal court’s judgment (acquittal), the Federal Supreme Court notes that the lower court did not make a new decision upon reassessment. The appellant's request to annul dispositive point 1 is unfounded and is therefore inadmissible. E.3: E.3.1-3.3: The appellant alleges that the imposed half participation in procedural costs violates the presumption of innocence. However, the lower court gave legally compliant reasons: the appellant had demonstrably caused the initiation of proceedings unlawfully and culpably by knowingly violating official orders concerning the certificate obligation. The cost imposition complies with the applicable provisions of Art. 426 para. 2 CPC and case law on the presumption of innocence (Art. 32 para. 1 BV, Art. 6 no. 2 ECHR). E.3.4: The causality between the appellant’s conduct and the initiation of criminal proceedings is adequate. E.3.5: Regarding lawyer compensation, the lower court rightly argued that an increase is not warranted since under the same conditions as the cost imposition, a reduction of compensation may also occur.
Summary of the dispositive
The dispositive result led to the dismissal of the appeal and the imposition of court costs amounting to CHF 3,000 on the appellant.
2C_634/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning the non-initiation of supervisory notifications
Summary of the facts
A.A. and B.A. opposed the release of files from a supervisory procedure concerning a notary by the Notarial Commission of the Canton of Obwalden. Their submissions were classified as "supervisory notifications" and, due to lack of party standing, were "not taken up". An appeal against this to the Administrative Court of the Canton of Obwalden was unsuccessful because appeals against supervisory complaints are inadmissible under cantonal law.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_204/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning naturalization procedure
Summary of the facts
An Italian citizen (A.________) with a C residence permit applied for regular naturalization in 2020. Due to a conviction for a fine and a penalty following a serious speeding violation, the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) refused the federal naturalization permit in May 2022, citing, among other reasons, a violation of public order. The Federal Administrative Court (TAF) upheld the applicant's appeal in 2026, annulled the SEM's decision, and remanded the case for reconsideration.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_594/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning postponement of execution of national expulsion
Summary of the facts
A.________, a Portuguese national, was sentenced in 2021 for several crimes including qualified simple bodily injury and endangering private secrecy, to a prison sentence of 24 months and a mandatory national expulsion for eight years. The judgment was finally confirmed by the Federal Supreme Court in 2023. Following the birth of his child in September 2023 and with regard to a planned marriage, A.________ applied for postponement of the execution of the expulsion. This request was rejected by the cantonal authorities and courts. The Federal Supreme Court reviewed these decisions on appeal.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_523/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning official sealing of business premises
Summary of the facts
Appellant 2 (a limited liability company in liquidation) was dissolved by the Commercial Court of the Canton of St. Gallen, and the liquidation was conducted under bankruptcy regulations. The bankruptcy administration sealed the business premises on 11 February 2026, against which appellant 2 filed an appeal. The Cantonal Court of St. Gallen rejected the appeal by circulation decision of 24 March 2026. Appellants 1 and 2 filed a civil appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1308/2024: Federal Supreme Court Judgment 7B_1308/2024
Summary of the facts
The court text is not available. Therefore, an analysis of facts, considerations, and dispositive is not possible.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_454/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning super provisional measures
Summary of the facts
The appellant (A.________ AG in liquidation) requested the supervisory authority Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Basel-Landschaft for a super provisional order instructing the bankruptcy office to take statute-interrupting measures regarding claims. The supervisory authority rejected this application (order of 11 May 2026). Thereupon, an appeal was filed with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_385/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning advance on costs and service fiction
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ filed a public law appeal against the judgment of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern, which did not admit her appeal because she did not pay the required advance on costs despite a grace period. The lower court relied on service fiction after A.________ did not collect the relevant court orders.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7F_23/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal aid
Summary of the facts
A.________ requested revision of the Federal Supreme Court judgment 7B_14/2026, in which the Federal Supreme Court did not admit her appeal regarding legal aid.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_222/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning a late legal remedy
Summary of the facts
The appellant, A.________, filed a late legal remedy against a penal order addressed to him. Both the police court of the Canton of Geneva and the appeal chamber of the Geneva cantonal court declared the corresponding legal remedies inadmissible, most recently by decision of 7 October 2025.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_730/2025: Decision concerning refusal of authorization for prosecution
Summary of the facts
A master's student at OST - Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences - filed a criminal complaint against several employees of the university. The allegations included defamation, slander, coercion, abuse of office, and simple bodily injury. The background was a conflict in one of his study program modules. The indictment chamber of the Canton of St. Gallen refused authorization to open criminal proceedings. The appellant requested before the Federal Supreme Court the annulment of this decision and the granting of authorization.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_593/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning recusal application against the Public Prosecutor's Office
Summary of the facts
A.________ filed a criminal complaint against B.________ and others and submitted a recusal request against the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Solothurn, with the request to transfer the case to an out-of-canton public prosecutor or a special public prosecutor. The Solothurn Cantonal Court rejected this request insofar as it admitted it.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_158/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning competence for enforcement according to Art. 90 VStrR
Summary of the facts
The proceedings concerned an appeal by the Department A.________ against a judgment of the Federal Criminal Court, Appeal Chamber, of 14.12.2025 (CA.2024.1). The question was the competence for enforcement according to Art. 90 para. 1 of the Federal Act on Administrative Criminal Law (VStrR).
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_909/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning traffic accident and following distance
Summary of the facts
A.________ was accused in connection with a traffic accident on the A1 motorway of failing to maintain a sufficient following distance. The Emmental-Oberaargau Public Prosecutor's Office issued a penal order against him, and the Bern Cantonal Court upheld his conviction for a simple traffic rule violation with a fine of CHF 500. A.________ filed a criminal appeal requesting acquittal or remand for reassessment.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1214/2025: Dismissal of the appeal concerning compensation claim and procedural costs
Summary of the facts
Background: A.________ was stopped by the Federal Customs Administration on 12.12.2023 at the border with a vehicle containing hidden cash amounting to CHF 15,300 and EUR 13,995. The banknotes showed a high contamination with cocaine. A.________ exercised his right to remain silent and denied any guilt. Procedural course: On 28.02.2024, the public prosecutor announced the termination of proceedings and set a deadline for claims for damages and restitution. The proceedings were terminated on 15.04.2024, costs were borne by the state, confiscated funds were retained, and A.________ was denied compensation for pre-trial detention suffered. A.________ filed an appeal to obtain compensation of CHF 7,200 for 36 days of detention. The appeal was rejected by the lower court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_595/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning negligent bodily injury by avalanche triggering
Summary of the facts
A.________ and B.________, experienced freeriders, were convicted of negligent simple bodily injury after triggering an avalanche on 15 January 2019 in the "D.________" couloir through their activities. This avalanche injured a ski instructor who was also in this couloir with two students. Despite the avalanche bulletin issued the same day with danger level 4 and visible tracks in the snow, they exposed themselves to the danger of entering the couloir without ensuring no other persons were in the line.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_143/2026: Upholding the appeal concerning unsealing of seized data carriers
Summary of the facts
A criminal proceeding for commercial fraud was conducted against the appellant. Among the investigations, two mobile phones were seized and sealed at the appellant's request. The public prosecutor requested unsealing, which the Dielsdorf District Court, coercive measures court, approved. The appellant challenged this decision invoking attorney-client and doctor-patient privilege as well as the protection of records.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_46/2026: Upholding the appeal in the area of data protection
Summary of the facts
An Afghan national (A.________) filed an asylum application in Switzerland on 22.06.2025, claiming to be a minor (date of birth: 24.04.2009). After a medical age assessment, the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) set the date of birth to 01.01.2007. This decision was entered into the central migration information system (SYMIC). A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Administrative Court (TAF), which declared it inadmissible on 11.12.2025 due to insufficient reasoning.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_384/2025: Dismissal of the appeal concerning DNA profile creation
Summary of the facts
A.________ was arrested by the police in Geneva on 19 February 2025 in connection with suspicion of drug trafficking. In a penal order issued by the public prosecutor, he was found guilty of violating Article 19 para. 1 of the Narcotics Act (BetmG), against which he filed an objection. The prosecutor also ordered the creation of a DNA profile. This was confirmed by the Chamber pénale de recours, after which A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_657/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning intentional endangerment by violation of construction regulations
Summary of the facts
On 9 January 2020, a roofer broke through a fiber cement panel at a construction site of a scaffolded hall and fell about 7.8 meters. A.________, managing director of C.________ GmbH, and B.________, foreman at the site, had inadequately implemented safety measures. The Schwyz Cantonal Court found both guilty of intentional endangerment by violation of construction regulations but held that there was no offense of negligent bodily injury. The appellants challenge this qualification before the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5D_23/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal aid and supplementary cost claim
Summary of the facts
The appellant was requested to pay court-imposed costs (CHF 400) from a settlement concerning maintenance matters. She repeatedly requested waiver or deferral of these amounts but ultimately did not respond to court requests. The civil court therefore obliged her to pay. She applied for legal aid against the cost assessment, which the Basel-Stadt Court of Appeal rejected as hopeless. The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against this rejection and the supplementary claim.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_428/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-initiation order in criminal matters
Summary of the facts
The appellant appealed to the Uri Cantonal Court against the non-initiation order of the Uri Public Prosecutor's Office dated 29 July 2025. By order of 23 March 2026, the Cantonal Court dismissed her appeal. The appellant then filed an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_596/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-initiation and legal aid
Summary of the facts
The Lucerne Cantonal Court did not admit the appellant's appeal against a non-initiation order of the Public Prosecutor's Office Division 3 Sursee and dismissed his application for legal aid. The appellant then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_328/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning embezzlement
Summary of the facts
The appellant (A.________) was convicted multiple times for offenses such as trespassing, property damage, violations of weapons law, and embezzlement. The lower courts imposed various sanctions including fines, penalties, and rules regarding confiscated items. In connection with embezzlement, A.________ played lottery tickets on 27 and 28 February 2023 without payment, causing his employer damage of CHF 684.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_976/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning sexual coercion and rape
Summary of the facts
A.B. was convicted by the criminal court of the Canton of Jura on 15 January 2025 for sexual coercion, rape, and other sexual offenses. On appeal, the higher court partially reduced these convictions, acquitted B. on certain charges, and imposed a lesser sentence. A., one of the alleged victims, appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, arguing among other things that the findings of the lower court were arbitrary and that her civil claims were wrongly dismissed.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_893/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning violation of the acceleration requirement
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ was convicted by the Zurich District Court (2021) for several offenses including theft, receiving stolen goods, forgery, narcotics and weapons violations, to a prison sentence of 44 months and a national expulsion. The Zurich Cantonal Court sentenced him in an appeal procedure in 2022 to five years imprisonment and extended the expulsion to ten years. After remand by the Federal Supreme Court due to violation of the right to be heard, the Cantonal Court confirmed its earlier judgment in 2025 and denied a violation of the acceleration requirement. With a renewed appeal, A.________ alleges that the Cantonal Court again violated the acceleration requirement and his right to be heard.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_524/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning conditional release from penal custody
Summary of the facts
The appellant was sentenced in 2022 for various crimes including rape and bodily injury to a prison sentence of four years and three months and a national expulsion of ten years. Since March 2023, he is in penal custody. An application for conditional release was rejected by the Security and Justice Department of the Canton of St. Gallen. The indictment chamber of the Canton of St. Gallen also dismissed the appeal against this rejection and an application for legal aid and legal assistance. The appellant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_283/2025: Dismissal of the compensation claim for family-provided assistance services
Summary of the facts
A.A.________, a severely multiply disabled minor born in March 2020, received an allowance for helplessness from 17 June 2020 and later an assistance contribution from August 2022. The parents demanded compensation for unused assistance hours from 2022 and 2023 that they themselves had provided, since an assistant was only employed in March 2023. The IV office of the Canton of Aargau rejected this, and the Insurance Court of the Canton of Aargau confirmed this. A.A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1145/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning recusal request in criminal proceedings
Summary of the facts
The criminal proceedings against A.________, a judge at the Obwalden Cantonal Court, for insult and slander led to the filing of a recusal request against the responsible public prosecutor Simone Germann. A.________ asserted apparent bias in the appeal proceedings. The Federal Supreme Court examined the appeal.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_603/2025: Partial upholding of the appeal concerning legality of body search and police custody
Summary of the facts
The appellant, A.________, was provisionally detained on the sidelines of an unauthorized demonstration in Lucerne on 30 May 2020. During transport, she bit a policewoman on the forearm. A body search with undressing was conducted, and she was in police custody until 31 May 2020. The appellant requested a finding that the body search and detention were unlawful and compensation in the form of damages. The lower court rejected her requests.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_654/2025: Judgment on liability claim and active legitimacy in bankruptcy proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________, former sole shareholder and board member of C.________ AG, was sued by the respondent B.________ for liability and damages. The respondent asserted claims from a commission agreement and assigned claims of the bankruptcy estate of C.________ AG. The dispute concerned in particular the active legitimacy of the respondent and the alleged breach of duty by the appellant in connection with financial transactions, especially the non-creation of provisions and purchase price reduction.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_125/2026: Judgment concerning sexual acts with children
Summary of the facts
A.________ was convicted by the Tribunal de police for acts involving the daughter of his partner and received a sentence of 12 months imprisonment with probation and a fine. Subsequently, his appeal against this judgment was rejected by the cantonal appellate court. The incidents he is accused of occurred over several years, during which A.________ regularly slept in the bed of the minor B.________ under the pretext of health complaints and sexually harassed her. These circumstances led to a complaint and further charges, which the Federal Supreme Court now has to decide on.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_735/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning threats, assaults, and sentencing
Summary of the facts
A.________ was convicted by the Horgen District Court for multiple threats, sexual harassment, assaults, and insults and sentenced to a conditional fine, a penalty, and damages payments. The appeal filed by the public prosecutor resulted in an increased sentence by the Zurich Cantonal Court, which imposed a prison sentence and a fine. A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_932/2025: Partial upholding of the appeal concerning violation of the acceleration requirement
Summary of the facts
A.A. was convicted by the criminal court of the Canton of Jura on 23 April 2024 for repeated sexual acts with children and rape between 2021 and 2022. The judgment included a prison sentence of four years, compensation to the civil party B. of CHF 15,000, and a lifelong ban on contact with minors. An appeal confirmed the judgment in essential points. The convicted person then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_609/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning insurance benefits after accident event
Summary of the facts
The case concerns A.________, who allegedly suffered an injury to the left knee in an accident on 17 January 2024. Zurich Insurance Company considered the status quo reached after eight weeks and refused to cover costs for further treatment beyond 13 March 2024. On appeal by the insured, the lower court confirmed the insurer's position and refused to order additional medical examination.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_285/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-initiation order
Summary of the facts
A.________ filed an appeal against a non-initiation order by the Lausanne District Attorney dated 26 June 2025. This appeal was declared inadmissible by the criminal chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court on 22 January 2026. Subsequently, A.________ submitted a written "revision request" (§ 410 CPC) regarding the lower court's judgment on 24 February 2026. This submission was forwarded to the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_100/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning determination of date of birth
Summary of the facts
An Afghan national, A.________, applied for asylum in Switzerland and gave different personal and birth data. The State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) determined, based on a medical expert opinion and other evidence, his date of birth as 1 January 2006. It denied his refugee status, rejected his asylum application, ordered his removal, but granted him provisional admission. The Federal Administrative Court (TAF) declared an appeal against the determination of the date of birth inadmissible due to lack of motivation.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_474/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning child visitation rights
Summary of the facts
A.________, born on 22 December 2021, lives with her unmarried mother C.________. Due to conflicts between the parents, the child protection authority (KESB) established educational custody and severely restricted the father's visitation rights. After escalations during supervised visits and various legal disputes, the Basel-Landschaft East Civil District Court decided to grant the father gradually expanding supervised visitation rights. The Basel-Landschaft Cantonal Court dismissed on 9 December 2025 the appeal of A.________, represented by her mother, against the decision of the Civil District Court. A.________ then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting the annulment of the contact rights.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_747/2025: Decision concerning defamation and slander
Summary of the facts
- A.________ was accused of having deliberately and repeatedly falsely accused the respondent B.________ of rape on Twitter on 4 May 2020, thus fulfilling the offenses of defamation and slander.
- The penal order of the Basel-Stadt public prosecutor (2021) led to conviction for defamation by the Basel-Stadt criminal court (2023) and confirmation of this conviction by the Basel-Stadt Court of Appeal (2025).
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_31/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning conditions and sanctions in animal disease legislation
Summary of the facts
A.________ AG, operator of a biogas plant, faced allegations of violations of animal disease legislation. Since 2015, it had veterinary permits for processing animal by-products (TNP) of categories 2 and 3. Several inspections revealed deficiencies, including inadequate separation and documentation of risk categories, as well as acceptance of TNP from suppliers not previously authorized. These deficiencies led to conditions, warnings, and an animal disease law reprimand. Two cantonal final decisions were reviewed by the Federal Supreme Court: a first decision on the allegations of legal violations and a second on the extension of the operating permit under new conditions.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_417/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning dispute in disability insurance
Summary of the facts
Two appellants, represented by their father and a lawyer, withdrew on 18 June 2026 their previously filed appeal against a judgment of the Insurance Court of the Canton of Solothurn dated 12 May 2026. The matter concerned a dispute in the field of disability insurance.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_626/2025: Third learner's permit with performance restriction - partial upholding
Summary of the facts
The appellant, A.________, applied to the Road Traffic Office of the Canton of Lucerne (StVA/LU) for the issuance of a third learner's permit in category A with performance restriction, after he had not obtained a positive exam result during the validity of his two previous learner's permits. The StVA/LU refused the application imposing a two-year suspension. The Lucerne Cantonal Court confirmed this decision. An appeal in public law matters was filed against it.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_763/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning missing document availability
Summary of the facts
No further information is available on the judgment with case number 7B_763/2025 of 10.07.2026, as the corresponding document is not electronically accessible.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_632/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning the Obwalden Lawyers' Commission
Summary of the facts
The Lawyers' Commission of the Canton of Obwalden reviewed a request for disclosure by the Cantonal Court concerning files from a supervisory procedure against a lawyer and partially upheld it. The submissions of A.A. and B.A., who opposed the disclosure request, were not taken up. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Obwalden did not admit the appeal against this. The appellants then filed an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_1034/2025: Decision on provisional registration of a restriction on disposal
Summary of the facts
A.________, appellant, exercised in 2025 a purchase right granted in 1991 on a property originally owned by his father and later transferred to B.________ and C.________, the respondents. After deletion of the land register notice in 2000, A.________ applied to the Regional Court Landquart in 2025 for provisional registration of a restriction on disposal. His application was rejected at first and second instance. A.________ then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_386/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning advance on costs and service fiction
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ opposed a non-admission ruling of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern, which had dismissed his appeal for failure to pay the required advance on costs. Previously, the Administrative Court had informed the appellant of the deadline by registered service; these services were legally valid by virtue of service fiction. A.________ requested the remand of the matter to the lower court or the setting of a new deadline.
The full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.