Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts only. The full summaries of all judgments are available on the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your legal fields.
6B_198/2026: Partial Approval concerning Civil Claims
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was convicted by the Geneva Police Court for commercial theft (Art. 139 No. 1 and 3 lit. a Swiss Criminal Code) to a conditional prison sentence of 12 months and ordered to pay CHF 274,981.62 in damages to B.B.________ SA. The appeal to the cantonal appellate court confirmed the judgment. The conviction was based on a series of thefts of electronic items at the workplace over a period of 19 months.
Summary of the Considerations
The allegations of violation of the principles of indictment and procedural rules were dismissed by the court, as no clearly reasoned objections were raised. The accusation of erroneous determination of the facts was rejected with reference to the detailed and non-arbitrary findings of the lower court. It was affirmed that A.________ derived economic benefits from the thefts by selling the stolen items or handing them over to her circle. The requirements for assuming commercial theft under Art. 139 No. 3 lit. a SCC were specified. Due to the systematic and planned approach as well as the duration of the offenses, this qualification was deemed justified. The conviction to a conditional prison sentence of 12 months was not considered disproportionate, as the severity of the guilt and the intentional character of the offense were appropriately taken into account. The acceptance of the civil claims of B.B.________ SA by the lower court was overturned. The Federal Supreme Court criticized insufficient establishment of the facts regarding the extent of the damage and referred the matter back to the cantonal court for reassessment.
Summary of the Dispositive
The appeal was partially upheld by annulling the lower court’s judgment regarding the civil claims and referring it back for reassessment, while the rest of the appeal was dismissed. Furthermore, orders were made regarding court costs and compensation payments.
9C_538/2024: Partial Approval of the Appeal concerning Disability Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) registered with the IV office Luzern in 2012 to receive benefits. A first decision from 2015 denied her entitlement, which became final. In August 2015, she registered again, leading to several medical expert opinions being commissioned. The last (PMEDA report of 15 March 2022) resulted in the IV office again rejecting the claim (decision of 21 February 2023). The Lucerne Cantonal Court confirmed this decision in a judgment of 21 August 2024. A.________ lodged an appeal against this before the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the Considerations
- Para. 1: The Federal Supreme Court reviews the application of federal law ex officio within the scope of Art. 95 ff. BGG, relying on the facts established by the lower court. Legal questions are decisive, while factual findings may only be reviewed to a limited extent. The legal situation before 2022 is relevant, as the disputes concern benefits claimed before that date. - Para. 2: It was examined whether reliance could be placed on the medical expert opinions. Special requirements apply to PMEDA reports, so in case of doubt a new expert examination must be ordered. It was also clarified that changes in the medical condition are necessary to establish a deterioration and thus a pension entitlement. - Para. 3: The lower court considered the SMAB (2016) and PMEDA (2022) reports as suitable evidence. A substantial change in health status could not be established based on the reports. - Para. 4: The appellant’s complaints regarding methodological deficiencies in the SMAB report were dismissed as no concrete errors or deficient evaluation of evidence could be proven. - Paras. 5-6: Critical objections against the PMEDA report, especially the orthopedic part, were partially upheld. The investigations and findings in the partial report were insufficiently documented, so they could not be used. - Para. 7: Due to the aforementioned deficiencies, the matter was referred back to the IV office Luzern for a complete new assessment and new decision.
Summary of the Dispositive
The appeal was partially upheld, the IV office’s decision was annulled, and the matter was referred back for a new decision. Court costs and party compensation were also imposed.
5A_991/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Child and Spousal Maintenance in Protective Marriage Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) and the respondent (B.________) disputed child and spousal maintenance in the context of protective marriage proceedings. The District Court Zurich decided on these points in December 2024. In the appeal procedure, the Zurich Cantonal Court decided in October 2025 in favor of the respondent and increased both child and spousal maintenance. The appellant filed an appeal in civil matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the Considerations
- Para. 1: The Federal Supreme Court first examined the admissibility requirements and found that the appeal against the final decision of the Cantonal Court was filed in due form and time, relating to property law civil matters (Art. 72 para. 1 BGG). As far as parts of the judgment do not burden the appellant or are not admissibly challenged, the appeal is not admitted.
- Para. 2: The Federal Supreme Court recalled that in protective marriage proceedings (Art. 98 BGG) only violations of constitutional rights can be challenged. A review of whether foreign law should have been applied to child maintenance was excluded due to the low degree of review.
- Para. 3: The Cantonal Court applied Swiss law to child maintenance, whereas the appellant had requested English law. The Federal Supreme Court found that this does not affect constitutional rights. The Cantonal Court’s view was also supported by doctrine, so no arbitrariness was found.
- Para. 4: Regarding spousal maintenance, the appellant complained about violation of his right to be heard. In particular, the Cantonal Court’s judgment did not address objections concerning insufficient reasoning and quantification of the respondent’s appeal. The Federal Supreme Court considered this complaint justified, as the Cantonal Court insufficiently examined the objections.
- Para. 5: The appeal was dismissed regarding child maintenance but upheld regarding spousal maintenance. The latter matter was referred back to the Cantonal Court for reassessment.
Summary of the Dispositive
The dispositive annulled parts of the Cantonal Court’s judgment and referred spousal maintenance back to the Cantonal Court for reassessment, while the appeal was partially dismissed. A ruling on court and party costs was also made.
5A_517/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Attachment Notices and Challenge Requests against Federal Judges
Summary of the Facts
The appellant challenged the service of attachment notices by the debt enforcement office Olten-Gösgen in four enforcement proceedings. His appeal was dismissed by the supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy of the canton of Solothurn, whereupon he filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court. He also requested the recusal of Federal Judge Bovey and two other judges.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_422/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Custodianship and Parental Responsibility
Summary of the Facts
The appellant is the mother of the child C.________, born in 2017. After the divorce, parental responsibility was left jointly to the parents and custody was awarded to the mother. Furthermore, an existing custodianship remained in place. The KESB Kreuzlingen rejected the mother’s applications for a new regulation of visitation rights and the allocation of sole parental responsibility or did not enter into them. The mother appealed these decisions, which were dismissed by the Thurgau Cantonal Court. She then filed an appeal in civil matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
4A_156/2025: Approval of the Appeal concerning Active Legitimation
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) disputed with his former lawyer (B.________) whether a contractual relationship existed entitling him to claim the return of party and court cost advances as well as damages due to an alleged breach of lawyer’s duty. The Lenzburg District Court affirmed the appellant’s active legitimation, but the Aargau Cantonal Court denied it and dismissed the claim in full. The appellant then filed an appeal in civil matters.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
7B_1318/2024: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Civil Claims related to Construction Defects
Summary of the Facts
The appeal is directed against a judgment of the criminal appeals chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court dated 16 August 2024, which referred to a previous decision of the Federal Supreme Court dated 21 February 2024. The core issue concerned civil claims related to construction defects in a glass staircase construction, the execution of which did not comply with the rules of construction art. The appeal relates to the liability of A.________ for civil claims after the Federal Supreme Court had annulled the analogous liability of E.________ in an earlier procedure.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9D_26/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Legal Aid
Summary of the Facts
A.________ challenged a judgment of the Administrative Court of the canton of Aargau, in which the court dismissed the request for reconsideration regarding legal aid, did not admit his appeal, and imposed a court fee on him. A.________ filed various applications, including a request for legal aid before the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_140/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Protective Marriage with Alternating Custody and Maintenance Claims
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (born 1989) and the respondent (born 1981) have been married since 2013 and are parents of a son (born 2016). After their application for regulation of separation, the Schaffhausen Cantonal Court decided on alternating custody, separation effects, and maintenance claims. The mother’s appeal against this decision was dismissed by the Schaffhausen Cantonal Court of Appeal, after which she filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_446/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Replacement of the Custodian
Summary of the Facts
The regional child protection and adult protection authority (KESB) Minusio established a representative custodianship for A.________ on 21 November 2022 pursuant to Art. 394 para. 1 ZGB and appointed B.________ as custodian. By decision of 23 April 2026, the authority replaced B.________ with C.________. The appellant A.________ challenged this decision. On 11 May 2026, the president of the appeals chamber of the Ticino Appellate Court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible for lack of sufficient reasoning. On 13 May 2026 (postmark 18 May 2026), A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
7B_78/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Interim Decision in Criminal Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
The company C.________ SA was declared bankrupt on 30 April 2018 by the president of the Civil Court of Saane. The specially appointed insolvency administrator filed charges on 25 June 2020 against the co-directors of the company, A.A.________ and B.A.________, for various offenses, including under Art. 222 SchKG, 163, 165, 166, and 323 SCC. The public prosecutor’s office of the canton of Fribourg initiated criminal proceedings on 13 January 2021 against the accused for bankruptcy offenses, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of bookkeeping obligations, and other offenses. In this context, the accused and witnesses were heard. By penal orders of 2 May 2023, the public prosecutor convicted the accused of violations of bookkeeping obligations (Art. 166 SCC) and other offenses to fines and an additional penalty. The special bankruptcy administrator filed appeals against these penal orders on 15 May 2023, especially regarding the implicit dismissal decision on other offenses. On 3 December 2024, the criminal chamber of the Fribourg Cantonal Court upheld the appeals and ordered the public prosecutor to issue formal dismissal orders. A.A.________ and B.A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 28 January 2025, requesting the annulment of the criminal chamber’s judgment, which had referred the matter back to the public prosecutor for a new decision.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9F_14/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Revision Request for Withholding Tax Period 2023
Summary of the Facts
The applicant A.________, who moved to Switzerland in autumn 2023, earned income in the last two months of 2023 which was subject to withholding tax. After submitting the 2023 tax declaration, the Zurich Cantonal Tax Office decided to carry out a subsequent ordinary assessment for A.________. His appeals against this failed until the Federal Supreme Court did not admit his appeal in judgment 9C_211/2026 of 30 April 2026. A.________ now requests revision of this non-admission decision.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
6B_791/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Pornography and Other Criminal Offenses
Summary of the Facts
The criminal proceedings concern a multitude of offenses spanning several years. The appellant, an incarcerated man previously convicted of sexual offenses, was charged inter alia with pornography, threats, coercion, attempted coercion, serious defamation, and other offenses. The lower court largely confirmed the appellant’s convictions.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_547/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Auction of Seized Liquidation Shares
Summary of the Facts
The appellants, a married couple in a community of property, faced the auction of their seized liquidation shares in the marital joint property. After the District Court Pfäffikon ordered the auction, the Zurich Cantonal Court, acting as the highest cantonal supervisory authority, dismissed the appeal on 2 June 2026 for lack of sufficient reasoning. The appellants then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_541/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Child Protection
Summary of the Facts
The appellant requested review of the professional and personal suitability of a custodian as well as further measures related to the existing custodianship for her son. The KESB rejected her application. The Solothurn Administrative Court did not admit the appeal as the required advance on costs was not paid. The appellant then brought the matter to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9F_10/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Revision and Correction of the Tax Claim
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on a revision and correction request by the Geneva tax administration against the Federal Supreme Court judgment of 24 February 2026 (9C_393/2025). That judgment had found that the tax claim of the canton of Geneva against A.________ SA for the 2016 tax year is no longer enforceable due to forfeiture.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9C_547/2025: Partial Approval of the Appeal concerning Valid Earnings and Pension Entitlement
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (born 1996) suffered a traffic accident in 2017 with severe head injuries. She subsequently changed her studies, resumed her original social sciences studies in 2018, and graduated in 2020. After some professional activities, she registered with the Zug IV office in 2022 for benefit claims due to health limitations. Based on determined disability degrees (64% from September 2022 and 68% from 2024), a graduated disability pension was granted. The appellant claimed that the valid earnings calculated by the IV office from statistical values were set too low and requested the award of a higher pension.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_525/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Opening of Bankruptcy over the Liquidation of a Corporation
Summary of the Facts
The Zug Cantonal Court opened bankruptcy over A.________ AG in liquidation. The company appealed this decision to the Zug Cantonal Court of Appeal, which did not admit it for formal reasons by presidential order of 30 April 2026. A.________ AG then filed an appeal in civil matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9C_333/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Cantonal Tax Assessment
Summary of the Facts
The Zurich Cantonal Tax Office assessed the state and municipal taxes as well as the direct federal tax for the year 2023 of spouses A.A.________ and B.A.________ in the exercise of due discretion, due to insufficient documents. Submissions by the appellants were considered inadmissible or insufficiently reasoned by the tax office, the tax appeals court, and the administrative court of the canton of Zurich. The appellants then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting substantive consideration of their appeals.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
6B_343/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Evaluation of Evidence and Deportation
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide an appeal by A.________ against a judgment of the Cour d'appel pénale of the Vaud Cantonal Tribunal dated 5 February 2026. It confirmed a judgment of the Tribunal correctionnel of the Arrondissement de l'Est vaudois, which had convicted A.________ inter alia for simple and aggravated battery, sexual coercion, threat, and property damage to 24 months imprisonment (partly conditional), a fine and a 15-year deportation order. The appeal challenged the evaluation of evidence, violation of the right to be heard, and the order of deportation.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5F_25/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Revision Request and Restoration of Deadline
Summary of the Facts
The applicant filed a revision request with the Federal Supreme Court to overturn judgment 5A_402/2026, in which the appeal was not admitted for lack of sufficient reasoning and court costs were imposed. She requested the opportunity to amend her appeal and restoration of the deadline. She also applied for legal aid.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_323/2026: Dismissal of the Appeal concerning Bankruptcy Opening and Solvency
Summary of the Facts
A.________ AG in liquidation was prosecuted in bankruptcy proceedings due to outstanding public-law claims totaling CHF 2,539.50. Bankruptcy was opened by the Höfe District Court after the company did not provide proof of payment and failed to appear at the hearing. In the cantonal appeals procedure, the company requested annulment of the bankruptcy opening. The Cantonal Court denied the credibility of solvency and confirmed the bankruptcy opening. A.________ AG appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
7B_477/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Criminal Matters
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against a decision of the criminal chamber of the Valais Cantonal Court dated 30 March 2026. This lower court had dismissed his cantonal appeal against two orders of the Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office of Lower Valais (inaction and denial of legal aid) as inadmissible.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9C_697/2024: Approval of the Appeal concerning Turnover Tax on Single Investor Funds
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ AG invested in a Liechtenstein single investor fund, which is considered a foreign collective capital investment. The Federal Tax Administration (FTA) demanded a turnover tax, which A.________ AG contested, arguing that the fund is exempt from the tax under Art. 17a para. 1 lit. c StG. After unsuccessful proceedings at lower instances, the appellant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_557/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Representative Custodianship and Outpatient Measures
Summary of the Facts
The Glâne district justice authority established a representative custodianship for the appellant A.________ on 14.11.2025, restricting her legal capacity regarding court proceedings related to a condominium owners’ association (PPE) and neighborhood, and ordered outpatient measures. The Fribourg Cantonal Court dismissed the complaints against this on 13.05.2026.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_543/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Valuation of a Property in the Context of Forced Sale
Summary of the Facts
In the context of a mortgage enforcement, the Basel-Stadt debt enforcement office requested, upon application by Bank B.________ AG, an appraisal of the market value of a property belonging to the appellant A.________. Two expert reports yielded different results: CHF 710,000 and CHF 847,000. The debt enforcement office set the average value (CHF 778,500) as the relevant appraisal value. The lower courts (Civil Court Basel-Stadt and Court of Appeal Basel-Stadt) confirmed this valuation and rejected the appellant’s request for a higher expert report, against which he appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
1C_209/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Legal Aid and Recusal Requests
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) filed three appeals with the Federal Supreme Court. The occasion was the dismissal of his legal aid application by the Basel-Stadt Appellate Court (order of 30 March 2026), rejection of his first recusal request (judgment of 20 April 2026), and non-admission of his second recusal request with simultaneous dismissal of the appeal due to non-payment of the advance on costs (order of 27 April 2026).
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_558/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Attachment Order
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed an appeal against the attachment order and the calculation of the subsistence minimum by the debt enforcement office Olten-Gösgen. The supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy of the canton of Solothurn dismissed the appeal insofar as it admitted it. A.________ then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9C_213/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Contributory Expense Shares
Summary of the Facts
The cantonal compensation office conducted a wage revision at the sole proprietorship G.________. It found that part of the lump-sum expenses of the five employees is subject to employer contribution obligations under AHV/IV/EO for the period from 01.01.2020 to 31.12.2024. This resulted in a wage back payment of CHF 88,017, from which social security contributions amounting to CHF 15,023.75 are owed. The cantonal insurance court confirmed the administrative act on appeal.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_1008/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Advance Payment of Costs and Legal Aid in Divorce Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
A.________ (appellant) and B.________ (respondent 1) are married and parents of two minor children. In divorce proceedings, A.________ repeatedly requested that his wife be ordered to pay an advance on court costs and legal aid. All requests, including a renewed request after prior dismissal, were rejected. The Aargau Cantonal Court did not admit the renewed requests and refused A.________ legal aid in the appeal proceedings. The appellant appealed this decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
1C_55/2026: Withdrawal of the Appeal concerning Building Law Replacement Construction
Summary of the Facts
The construction department of the Zurich city council granted A.________ a building permit in 2023 for a replacement construction. After an appeal procedure initiated by the respondent, the Zurich Cantonal Administrative Court annulled the building permit in 2025. A.________ then filed an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court. During the proceedings, A.________ withdrew the appeal, which led to the dismissal of the case.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
2C_212/2025: Decision concerning International Sanctions and Removal from Ukraine Regulation
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a Russian businessman and majority shareholder (79.76%) as well as chairman of the board of the steel and metal company B.________, requested removal of his name from Annex 8 of the Ukraine Regulation (O-Ukraine) of the Federal Council. This regulation is based on international sanctions against Russia relating to the military intervention in Ukraine. The application was rejected at all lower instances. A.________ was included in Annex 8 due to his classification as a “leading businessman” in a sector (metallurgy) generating significant revenues for the Russian government. A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting among other things the annulment of all sanctions against him and a public hearing.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_1105/2025: Determination of the Residence of the Minor Daughter in Alternating Custody
Summary of the Facts
The unmarried parents of a daughter born in 2021 separated in 2024. The father remained in the canton of Thurgau, while the mother moved to the canton of Schaffhausen. After various court proceedings to regulate child matters, the child’s residence was initially set with the father. The mother requested in appeal that the residence of the daughter be set with her, which the Thurgau Cantonal Court of Appeal ultimately approved. The father then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_911/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Custody Regulation
Summary of the Facts
The case concerns the right to personal relationships between a father and his children within the framework of a custody regulation. The mother requested, based on an expert assessment, restriction of the father’s visitation rights, especially by excluding overnight stays. The lower courts ruled differently on the father’s rights, with the Federal Supreme Court ultimately confirming a temporary restriction of visitation rights.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_395/2025: Child Maintenance: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Hypothetically Attributed Income
Summary of the Facts
A.________ and B.________, parents of a child born in 2018 and divorced since 2024, disputed the maintenance contribution that A.________ should provide to the child (CHF 950 monthly according to first instance judgment). The lower court confirmed the father’s obligation, taking into account a hypothetical income attributed to him (para. 4.1).
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
7B_665/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Preliminary Detention and Restoration of Appeal Deadline
Summary of the Facts
On 13 February 2026, the criminal chamber of the Geneva Cantonal Court declared an appeal by A.________ concerning his preliminary detention and alleged infringement of his fundamental rights inadmissible. On 17 May 2026, supplemented on 20 May 2026, A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting among other things restoration of the appeal deadline and granting of legal aid.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9C_652/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Tax Residency of a Company and Intercantonal Tax Sovereignty
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ GmbH was founded in 2014 and changed its registered office several times, most recently in 2025 to W.________/ZH. For the tax periods 2016 to 2021, the canton of Zurich claimed tax sovereignty because the place of actual management was located in this canton according to the tax assessment authority. The company argued that its corporate decisions were primarily made abroad and not in the canton of Zurich. After rejection of the objection and final decisions of the tax authorities in the canton of Zug as well as dismissal of appeals by the tax appeals court and administrative court of the canton of Zurich, the company appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
7B_1105/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Unsealing of a Mobile Phone
Summary of the Facts
A.________ is suspected in criminal investigation of qualified violation of the narcotics law and other offenses. His mobile phone was seized during a house search on 27 August 2025, after which A.________ requested sealing. He justified this with confidential attorney correspondence. The public prosecutor’s office filed an application for precautionary data mirroring, which was approved by the coercive measures court. The mirroring was carried out under the condition that the secured data would also be sealed. On 15 October 2025, the coercive measures court partially granted the request to unseal, excluding correspondence with the lawyer.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
9C_300/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Disability Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed an appeal against a judgment of the Lucerne Cantonal Court, which had refused a benefit from disability insurance. The lower court concluded that no relevant change in factual circumstances was ascertainable during the relevant period and that the waiting period under Art. 28 para. 1 lit. b IVG was not met.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
7B_560/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Criminal Proceedings and Evaluation of Evidence
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed a criminal complaint on 28 July 2021 for theft, simple bodily injury, and battery against B.________. The competent prosecutor of the canton of Ticino discontinued the proceedings by decree on 8 January 2024. A.________ filed a late appeal, which was declared inadmissible. Later, A.________ requested both reopening of the proceedings and filed another appeal against the original dismissal decree, which the lower court (Corte dei reclami penali) dealt with and dismissed or declared inadmissible. A.________ then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting a full review of the evidence, especially the audio recordings.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_544/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Revision of Income Attachment
Summary of the Facts
The Obwalden debt enforcement office carried out a revision of the income attachment concerning the appellant on 15 December 2025 and set a subsistence minimum of CHF 4,047.35 and an attachable quota of CHF 69.70. An appeal against this was dismissed by the cantonal supervisory authority of the Obwalden Cantonal Court on 28 May 2026. The appellant then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_556/2026: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Delay Complaint in Connection with Attachment
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ AG filed a delay complaint because an attachment scheduled for 11.11.2025 only took place on 11.03.2026. After execution of the attachment, the lower court declared the proceedings moot. Another complaint, which included disciplinary allegations against debt enforcement officers, was dismissed.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
5A_549/2026: Dismissal of the Appeal concerning the Content of Debt Enforcement Register Extracts
Summary of the Facts
A.________ requested correction of his debt enforcement register extract from the Basel-Landschaft debt enforcement office in order to include the reason for the termination of two bankruptcies of his sole proprietorship B.________. The debt enforcement office referred to Directive No. 4 of the supervisory service for debt enforcement and bankruptcy, according to which only the opening and closing of a bankruptcy procedure, but not the reason for its termination, must be listed in the extract. The Basel-Landschaft supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy dismissed an appeal against this decision.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.
8C_701/2025: Non-Admission of the Appeal concerning Disability Pension
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, born in 1963 (trained photo lab technician), claimed a disability pension in January 2019 based on a moderate depressive episode and a panic disorder. After investigations, the Zurich IV office rejected her application. The appellant appealed to the Zurich Social Insurance Court, which dismissed her appeal. She then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available on the portal.