Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts in each case. The full summaries of all judgments are available on the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your legal areas.
5A_995/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning protocol correction in inheritance proceedings
Summary of the facts
The testatrix D.________ died in 2021 leaving two children, A.________ and C.________. The estate included among other things real estate in Switzerland and the USA as well as bank deposits exceeding CHF 2 million. A public settlement was concluded during an instruction hearing regulating the distribution of the estate. Dispute over the correctness of a passage in the minutes of this hearing led to a request for protocol correction by A.________ and B.________, which was rejected. The decision of the Zurich Cantonal Court regarding this correction request was appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the considerations
The appeal concerns an interim decision relating to a protocol correction request. According to Art. 93 para. 1 lit. a BGG, a challenge is only possible if an irreparable disadvantage of a legal nature is threatened. The appellants argued that the settlement was irreversible and the protocol correction was relevant in the ongoing revision proceedings. The Federal Supreme Court held that the appellants could raise the correctness of the protocol also in the revision proceedings themselves or challenge the interim decision with the final decision. Therefore, no irreparable disadvantage existed. The requirements for contestability of the interim decision under Art. 93 para. 1 lit. a BGG were thus not met.
Summary of the dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court did not admit the appeal and imposed court costs of CHF 3,000 on the appellants without awarding party compensation.
5A_219/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning neighbor law disputes
Summary of the facts
A.________ and B.________, co-owners of parcel no. 4220 in X.________, sued their neighbor C.________. She had made changes to her parcel no. 4101, including expanding the garage close to the common boundary. The plaintiffs demanded, among other things, the removal of an overhanging roof and the setback of the garage by 3–4 meters. The deputy judge of Locarno City partially upheld the claim and obliged C.________ to remove the roof. Subsequently, both parties appealed. The Ticino Court of Appeal additionally obliged C.________ to erect a privacy screen but dismissed the plaintiffs’ further claims.
Summary of the considerations
1. Admissibility of the legal remedy (E.1–1.2): The Federal Supreme Court examines the admissibility of the remedy ex officio. In this case, the dispute value of CHF 30,000 was not demonstrably reached pursuant to Art. 74 para. 1 lit. b BGG, as the appellants did not provide sufficient information on the change in value of the affected properties. Therefore, the appeal could not be treated as an appeal in civil matters. 2. Examination as a subsidiary constitutional complaint (E.2): Due to the lack of substantial justification of a violation of constitutional rights (Art. 116 BGG), the remedy was also inadmissible as a subsidiary constitutional complaint.
Summary of the dispositive
The appeal was declared inadmissible. In addition, the court costs were imposed on the appellants without awarding party compensation.
9C_178/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning tax corrections
Summary of the facts
The taxpayer, a sole proprietor in real estate and holder of several participations in the construction industry as well as other assets, was assessed by the cantonal tax administration of Valais for the tax periods 2013 to 2016 with various corrections made. Both the objection and the cantonal appeal level led to partial adjustments and confirmations of the tax corrections. The taxpayer finally lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the considerations
- E.1: The appeal is directed against a final decision and an earlier interim decision. The interim decision must be considered in connection with the present appeal. The admissibility requirements according to BGG are fulfilled. - E.2: The Federal Supreme Court applies federal law ex officio (Art. 106 para. 1 BGG) but examines cantonal law only for violations of federal law. The appellant must specifically allege and justify the violation of constitutional rights. - E.3: Regarding several complaints of the appellant, including those concerning vehicle costs and contributions to the sole proprietorship, the lower court did not admit them due to insufficient reasoning. The Federal Supreme Court confirms this non-admission decision. - E.4: Regarding rental income on a private account, benefits in kind, capital gains from art and vehicle sales as well as the valuation of a loan claim, the Federal Supreme Court finds that the appellant has neither presented sufficient evidence nor convincing legal arguments against the lower court’s conclusions. It confirms the assessments of the lower court.
Summary of the dispositive
The appeal is dismissed and court costs of CHF 4,000 are imposed on the appellant without party compensation.
2C_289/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning reopening of the proceedings
Summary of the facts
A.________ requested the extension of his expired residence permit. This was refused by the migration office of the canton of St. Gallen on 14 August 2024. After unsuccessful legal remedies, A.________ filed an application for reopening the proceedings with the administrative court of the canton of St. Gallen on 15 April 2026. The administrative court did not admit the application.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2D_9/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning public procurement
Summary of the facts
The proceedings concern a dispute over public procurement in the canton of Neuchâtel, specifically the tender for the renewal of ticket machines. After the contract was awarded to C.________ AG, the unsuccessful A.________ GmbH appealed to the Federal Supreme Court requesting, among other things, the reinstatement of the suspensive effect of the cantonal legal remedy. The client, B.________ SA, argued that technical and planning obstacles made urgent implementation of the project necessary.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_106/2025: Upholding of the appeal concerning seizure orders by the tax office
Summary of the facts
The Cantonal Tax Office of Solothurn ordered seizures amounting to CHF 613,787.50 and additional amounts against A.A.________ and B.A.________ due to allegedly endangered tax claims and fines for the tax periods 2012–2015. These were already covered by a criminal confiscation by the Federal Tax Administration (FTA) in the amount of CHF 4,337,222. The tax court of Solothurn dismissed the appeal filed against it.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_748/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning zoning plan Tennisclub Old Boys
Summary of the facts
The Grand Council of the canton Basel-Stadt declared on 11 December 2024 the zoning plan no. 14,413 for the "Tennisclub Old Boys area, Schützenmatte West" binding. An extension of the tennis facility with an outdoor tennis court and a tennis hall is planned. A.A. and other objectors opposed this decision to the Court of Appeal Basel-Stadt, which dismissed the appeal. Subsequently, A.A. and B.A. filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 12 December 2025.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_288/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning denial/delay of justice
Summary of the facts
A.________ turned to the administrative court of the canton Zurich due to alleged denial or delay of justice by the migration office of the canton Zurich. The administrative court did not admit the appeal for lack of functional jurisdiction. A.________ then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting the annulment of the order and remand for substantive treatment. He also requested legal aid and legal representation free of charge.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_91/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning acknowledgment of debt in settlement
Summary of the facts
A.________ SA had committed in an "agreement" dated 10 May 2024 to pay B.________ AG CHF 79,676.05 in monthly installments. After a payment default, B.________ AG initiated debt enforcement and obtained provisional legal authorization, which was confirmed by both the first-instance court and the appellate court. A.________ SA appealed this decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_83/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning administrative fine in tax proceedings
Summary of the facts
A.________, a taxpayer registered in the Zurich bar register, received preliminary files for inspection from the tax appeals court of the canton Zurich in connection with tax proceedings. Despite several extended deadlines, he did not return them in time, whereupon the tax appeals court imposed an administrative fine of CHF 500. The administrative court of the canton Zurich dismissed his appeal. Before the Federal Supreme Court, A.________ requested the annulment of the administrative fine.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_694/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning suspension of compensation
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________, a trained cook, was unemployed and registered with unemployment insurance. He was obliged to demonstrate at least 14 job search activities per month. In December 2024, he omitted the required job searches because he had assumed, based on a supposedly verbally agreed employment contract, to be able to start work again from January 2025. However, the employment start was postponed to April 2025. The competent cantonal authority (OCE) ordered a five-day suspension of compensation, which was confirmed by the cantonal instance.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_519/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal aid in bankruptcy proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellants, a company (A.________) and its managing partners (B.________ and C.________), filed an appeal against a cantonal decision rejecting their requests for legal aid in bankruptcy proceedings.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_771/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning data modification in the SYMIC system
Summary of the facts
A.________, a Beninese national, gave 25 December 2009 as his date of birth in his asylum application in Switzerland. The State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) initially changed this date in the SYMIC system to 1 January 2006, then to 1 January 2007, with the note that the date was disputed. After two negative SEM decisions, the Federal Administrative Court (FAC) partially overturned these and demanded further clarification including a medico-legal expert opinion. The finding of this expertise indicated a minimum age of 17.57 years and a maximum age of 24 years but excluded birth on 25 December 2009. The FAC then considered the SEM data change lawful.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_453/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning execution of an attachment
Summary of the facts
A.________ filed an appeal on 18 May 2026 against the decision of the Chambre de surveillance des Offices des poursuites et faillites of the Cour de justice of the canton Geneva dated 7 May 2026, concerning the execution of an attachment. A.________ requested the granting of suspensive effect. On 3 June 2026, A.________ declared the withdrawal of the appeal, which was received by the Federal Supreme Court on 4 June 2026. The respondent B.________ filed his statement on the suspensive effect on 4 June 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_189/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning disability pension
Summary of the facts
The appellant (born 1964) applied for benefits from the disability insurance at the IV office of the canton Thurgau on 19 January 2023 due to several health impairments. After obtaining medical reports and conducting a multidisciplinary assessment, the IV office denied both entitlement to a disability pension and vocational measures by decision dated 24 June 2025. The administrative court of the canton Thurgau dismissed the related appeal on 21 January 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9D_24/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning waiver of costs and legal aid
Summary of the facts
A.________ requested, after dismissal of her previous appeal, that the court costs imposed on her by the lower court be waived. After the administrative court of the canton Zurich rejected the application, she filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court, alleging violations of Art. 29 para. 3 BV and Art. 6 ECHR among others.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_206/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-admission order
Summary of the facts
A.________ filed an appeal with the cantonal court of Graubünden against the non-admission order of the public prosecutor of the canton Graubünden dated 26 February 2026. This court did not admit the appeal due to insufficient reasoning by order dated 24 March 2026. A.________ then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
12T_4/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning delay of justice at the Federal Administrative Court
Summary of the facts
The family A.________, consisting of parents and three children from Azerbaijan, filed an asylum application in Switzerland in 2017, which was rejected in 2021, with a provisional admission ordered due to danger to the father. A subsequent complaint against the decision of the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) before the Federal Administrative Court remained undecided for years. The family had already filed a supervisory complaint for delay of justice in 2024, which was unsuccessful. On 25 November 2025, they again filed a supervisory complaint with the Federal Supreme Court’s administrative commission. The family criticizes the long procedural duration at the Federal Administrative Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_354/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning submission of evidence in opposition proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court on 27 April 2026 against a decision of the Zurich Cantonal Court, which dismissed her appeal concerning the request by the Winterthur-Stadt debt enforcement office to submit evidence in opposition proceedings. The enforcement office had requested the appellant to submit her evidence by the deadline of 22 September 2025 to prove ownership rights. The Federal Supreme Court decided not to admit the case.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_611/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning write-off order in an inheritance division and reduction procedure
Summary of the facts
A dispute over the division of the estate of the deceased D.________ in 2021 led to a court settlement in which the parties agreed to partially divide the estate assets. The settlement was signed by the defense attorneys as the defendants were absent during the hearing. The proceedings were thus closed by a write-off order of the district court. The two defendants (A.________ and B.________) did not accept the settlement and the write-off order and initiated several proceedings, including an appeal and complaint procedure before the Zurich Cantonal Court. This court did not admit the remedy.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_456/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning inadmissible legal remedies
Summary of the facts
The appeal is directed against a decision of the III Civil Chamber of the Ticino Court of Appeal dated 9 April 2026. In this context, the appellant A.________ faces the question whether a decision ordering him to seek legal representation within 20 days was lawful. The lower court declared the remedy inadmissible as no serious disadvantage according to Art. 319 lit. b CPC existed.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_89/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning refund of VOC steering charges
Summary of the facts
A.________ AG applied for a refund of VOC steering charges for the tax period 2023/2024. While the Federal Customs and Border Security Office (BAZG) granted a refund of CHF 220,269, the appellant later submitted a corrected VOC statement and additionally requested a refund of CHF 83,727.60. The Federal Administrative Court dismissed the appeal as the additional refund claimed was forfeited due to the expiration of the limitation period under Art. 19 para. 1 VOCV. A.________ AG appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_727/2024: Partial upholding of the appeal concerning disability pension
Summary of the facts
A.________ (born 1969) originally applied for disability insurance benefits in 2013, which the IV office Solothurn denied. After conducted expert reports, the IV office again rejected entitlement to vocational measures and a disability pension on 7 November 2017. In July 2020, A.________ filed a new application, which was again rejected by the IV office’s decision of 11 May 2023. The insurance court of the canton Solothurn partially upheld A.________’s appeal, granted her a temporary disability pension and remanded the case back to the IV office for examination of entitlement to vocational measures. The IV office appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9D_8/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning tax remission application
Summary of the facts
The tax office of the districts Lausanne and West-Lausanne refused A.________’s application for tax remission for cantonal and municipal taxes as well as direct federal tax for the 2020 tax period by decision dated 5 April 2023. The cantonal tax administration of Vaud rejected a subsequent objection against this decision on 28 January 2025. The appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed by the administrative court of Vaud on 18 March 2026. A.________ then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting tax remission and legal aid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_356/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning service of a payment order
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed an appeal against the notification of a payment order by the Winterthur-Stadt debt enforcement office and its revocation. The cantonal instances, the Winterthur district court and the Zurich cantonal court, did not admit the respective appeals. The cantonal court struck the proceedings since the appeal was deemed not filed. The appellant then turned to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_233/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning withdrawal of vehicle registration
Summary of the facts
A.________ had his vehicle registration and license plates withdrawn by decision of the Department of Road Traffic and Shipping of the canton Valais. An appeal filed against this measure with the cantonal council was declared inadmissible due to failure to pay the required advance on costs. This decision was confirmed by the president of the public law division of the cantonal court of Valais. A.________ appeals the cantonal court decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_353/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning deadline setting for opposition lawsuit
Summary of the facts
The appellant contested the deadline set by the Winterthur-Stadt debt enforcement office for filing a lawsuit to assert her ownership rights on the pledged property. The lower court, the Zurich Cantonal Court (judgment dated 7 April 2026), partially upheld the appeal and ordered the enforcement office to reset the deadline. Against this judgment, the appellant lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court. In parallel proceedings, it became known that bankruptcy proceedings had been opened against the debtor B.________ AG, rendering the enforcement on the mortgage lien moot. The Federal Supreme Court therefore denied the appellant’s legitimate interest in the appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_993/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning nullity of a court settlement in inheritance division
Summary of the facts
The testatrix D.________ died in 2021 leaving two children, A.________ and C.________, as well as various real estate properties and significant bank deposits. A court settlement dated 13 May 2025, which regulated the distribution of assets among other things, led to disputes between the heirs. A.________ and B.________, the son’s partner, subsequently requested annulment of the settlement and the related write-off order. These claims were handled in various proceedings before the Winterthur district court and the Zurich Cantonal Court. The present appeal concerns the decision of the appellate commission of the Zurich Cantonal Court, which did not admit the supervisory complaints regarding the nullity of the settlement and disciplinary measures against the district judge.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_93/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning building permit for new construction in Lausanne
Summary of the facts
The appellants (including Patrimoine Suisse and other individuals) oppose the granting of a building permit by the city of Lausanne, which was approved after rejection of their objection in the canton of Vaud. The project involves demolition of a historic villa rated *4* in the Vaud architectural inventory and construction of a multipurpose building. The respondents allege, among other things, planning errors and insufficient consideration of cultural heritage.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1379/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning breach of official secrecy
Summary of the facts
B.________, former head of the legal service of the Health Department of St. Gallen, was accused of having violated official secrecy in two cases by unlawfully passing on files of a disciplinary procedure against A.________ and providing information to a journalist by phone. The appellant A.________, also criminal and civil plaintiff, demanded conviction of B.________ as well as satisfaction, interest payments and compensation. The lower courts acquitted B.________ and dismissed the civil lawsuit, but the cantonal court found a violation of the acceleration requirement.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_40/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal authorization and recusal request
Summary of the facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on two appeals filed by Alfred Wüst and B.________ AG against decisions of the Thurgau Cantonal Court dated 5 February 2026 (BR.2025.107/BR.2025.105). The appeals concern proceedings for definitive legal authorization for fees of the cantonal court amounting to CHF 250 each and the dismissal of recusal requests against the Arbon district court and the Thurgau cantonal court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_179/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning administrative detention and expulsion of a Turkish national
Summary of the facts
A Turkish national (born 1997), whose asylum application was rejected by the State Secretariat for Migration on 20 August 2025 and whose expulsion from Switzerland was legally ordered, was taken into administrative detention on 12 March 2026. The appellant refused to leave Switzerland and tried to challenge his expulsion by several letters to the Federal Supreme Court. He referred to dangers in Turkey, his psychological state, and the risk of serving a prison sentence in his home country.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_439/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning procedural costs and non-submission of a filing
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ addressed the Dorneck-Thierstein debt enforcement office by email with a filing dated 30 April 2026, which forwarded it to the supervisory authority for debt enforcement and bankruptcy of the canton Solothurn. The supervisory authority deemed the filing not submitted pursuant to Art. 132 para. 1 CPC, called it manifestly frivolous, and imposed procedural costs on the appellant. The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against this decision but did not provide sufficient reasoning.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_377/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning DNA analysis
Summary of the facts
The appellant challenged the judgment of the Freiburg Cantonal Court, which dismissed his appeal against the order of the public prosecutor’s office for analysis of his DNA sample. The DNA analysis is related to suspicion of criminal offenses, especially regarding alleged involvement in a theft and preparatory acts for robbery.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_351/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning deadline setting for opposition lawsuit
Summary of the facts
The appellant asserted ownership rights to a pledged property. The Winterthur-Stadt debt enforcement office set a deadline pursuant to Art. 107 SchKG for filing a lawsuit against bank C.________ AG, which disputed the claim. The appellant filed multiple appeals against this with various instances, most recently with the Zurich Cantonal Court, which reset the deadline again. With the opening of bankruptcy proceedings against B.________ AG as debtor, the enforcement on the mortgage lien became moot, whereby the Federal Supreme Court denied the appellant’s legitimate interest in the appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_214/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning employment contract
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ filed a claim with the Sense district labor court against the respondent B.________ AG. The labor court dismissed the claim on 18 September 2025. The appellant appealed to the Freiburg Cantonal Court, II Civil Appellate Chamber, which did not admit the appeal on 16 March 2026. The appellant then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court and submitted a supplementary reasoning on 30 May 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_469/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning registration in the architects’ register
Summary of the facts
A Spanish national (A.________) holding a diploma as "Ingeniero Industrial" obtained in Spain, partially recognized as equivalent in Switzerland by SEFRI, applied in the canton of Neuchâtel for registration in the register of architects and landscape architects. This registration was refused because he neither possesses a corresponding diploma nor a recognized equivalent qualification. The administrative court confirmed the cantonal refusal. A.________ appealed this decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_283/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-admission and discontinuation of criminal proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant challenged five decisions of the Bern Cantonal Court (Criminal Appeals Chamber) dismissing his appeals against non-admission or discontinuation of criminal proceedings as well as recusal decisions.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_76/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning tenant eviction
Summary of the facts
The appellant was ordered by the Hochdorf district court on 1 December 2025 to vacate, clean a storage room, and return the keys to the respondent. The Lucerne Cantonal Court dismissed an appeal against this decision on 7 April 2026 and confirmed the district court’s judgment. The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 5 May 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_273/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning entitlement to daily sickness benefits
Summary of the facts
The appellant filed an appeal against the judgment of the Bern Administrative Court dated 9 April 2026. The dispute concerned denial of entitlement to daily sickness benefits by the Bern unemployment insurance office from 10 September 2025 onwards.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_461/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning contestation of garnishment
Summary of the facts
The appellant was subject to two garnishment groups at the Emmental-Oberaargau debt enforcement office. In the first group, the garnishment deed and calculation of the subsistence minimum were made on 8 December 2025, while in the second group several garnishment announcements were issued in January and February 2026. The appellant filed an appeal with the Bern Cantonal Court. This court did not admit the appeal on 27 April 2026 or partially struck it as moot. On 21 May 2026, the appellant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_355/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning opposition proceedings
Summary of the facts
A dispute over a property led after sale and subsequent rescission of the purchase contract to opposition questions regarding ownership and land register annotation. In the framework of mortgage enforcement proceedings, the appellant asserted sole ownership of the property. The enforcement office ordered opposition proceedings as the appellant was only provisionally registered as owner. However, it did not admit her further claims.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1077/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revocation of community service
Summary of the facts
A.________ was sentenced by the Vaud Cantonal Court on 11 May 2020 for embezzlement, breach of trust, and neglect of maintenance obligations to 30 months imprisonment, 6 months unconditional. He was given the opportunity to serve the sentence by community service. This enforcement regime was revoked by the Office for Sanctions and Accompanying Measures (OSAMA) of the canton Valais on 11 June 2024. A.________ appealed this decision but ultimately without success as the Valais Cantonal Court did not admit his appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_323/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning asylum application
Summary of the facts
The State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) rejected the asylum applications of the Ukrainian nationals A.________ and B.________, denied their refugee status, and ordered their expulsion. The Federal Administrative Court rejected an application for legal aid for the lower court proceedings and required the appellants to pay an advance on costs. A.________ and B.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court requesting suspension of expulsion and legal aid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_352/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning evidence in opposition proceedings
Summary of the facts
The appellant appealed against an order of the Winterthur-Stadt debt enforcement office to submit evidence in opposition proceedings. After two appeal procedures (Winterthur district court and Zurich Cantonal Court), she turned to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_537/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning dismissal from public service
Summary of the facts
A.________, a former civil servant, was dismissed from public service due to an incident in emergency service. He was accused of having performed an intubation without competence, experience, or delegation, which was not correctly executed and possibly influenced the death of a child. He challenged his dismissal, among other things due to alleged violation of the right to be heard and lack of reintegration examination. The lower court declared the dismissal fundamentally lawful but found a violation of procedural law and commented on possible reintegration or compensation.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_433/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning insurance coverage
Summary of the facts
B.________ GmbH was insured with A.________ SE in 2017 and 2018 against investment, operational and product liability risks. A claim for insurance coverage in a class action in Australia was made due to installation of defective "aluminium composite panels" (ACP). The insurer refused coverage referring to a prior risk clause. The Zurich Commercial Court granted the plaintiff a partial amount of the claimed sum, after which the defendant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
12T_3/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning supervisory complaint over the Federal Administrative Court
Summary of the facts
A.A.________ and her children filed a supervisory complaint on 7 November 2025, alleging that their appeal filed on 22 October 2021 with the Federal Administrative Court had not yet been decided at the time of the filing. They demanded that the Federal Administrative Court remedy structural defects and decide faster. The procedure examines the administrative supervision of the Federal Supreme Court over the Federal Administrative Court pursuant to Art. 1 para. 2 BGG.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_484/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning reclaiming of child pensions
Summary of the facts
The appellant A.________ (born 1970) received a disability pension from the Zurich IV office from July 2013, including child pensions for his three children. After separating from his wife in August 2017, the child pensions were paid directly to her. By rulings dated 22 January 2020, the IV office retroactively changed this arrangement for the period from July 2013 and assigned the back payment of child pensions to A.________. Subsequently, the IV office demanded repayment of amounts previously paid to the mother; the Zurich Social Insurance Court decided that she did not have to refund them. The IV office then requested repayment from the appellant himself at the end of 2021, which he challenged with an appeal at the cantonal social insurance court. This court dismissed the appeal. The appellant then filed a public law appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_732/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning entitlement to benefits from disability insurance
Summary of the facts
The appellant, a trained mason, filed an application for disability insurance benefits in June 2021 due to pain in the left hand. The IV office of the canton Valais rejected the application in September 2023 as no disabling health impairment existed. The cantonal instance (Tribunal cantonal du Valais) confirmed this decision in November 2025. The appellant requested, among other things, an updated medical assessment before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_171/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning withdrawal of the appeal
Summary of the facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on an appeal by A.A.________ against a decision of the Zurich Social Insurance Court dated 29 January 2026. The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant on 18 May 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1373/2024: Judgment against A.________ for sexual acts with children and pornography
Summary of the facts
On 20 April 2017, A.________ contacted the allegedly 13-year-old 'Sara' in the chatroom 'Chatmania', behind whose pseudonym members of the Bern cantonal police were hiding. In the following months, A.________ chatted under an alias with 'Sara' and repeatedly urged her to perform sexual acts on herself. He also described various sexual acts he wanted to perform with her. By judgment dated 28 July 2021, the Regional Court Bern-Mittelland convicted A.________ of sexual acts with children, multiple attempted, and pornography, multiple committed, and sentenced him to a conditional fine of 150 daily rates. A.________ then appealed, which was confirmed by the appellate court with a fine of 150 daily rates each CHF 260. Against this judgment, A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting partial annulment of the appellate court’s judgment.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.