Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries with facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts. The complete summaries of all judgments are available in the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments tailored to your legal fields.
5A_263/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning bankruptcy opening over A.________ GmbH
Summary of Facts
The A.________ GmbH, which is engaged in the trade of weapons, ammunition, and leisure articles, was declared bankrupt by decision of the Civil Court Basel-Stadt on 5 February 2026 following a petition by the Canton of Basel-Stadt in debt enforcement no. xxx. The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Basel-Stadt dismissed the appeal filed by A.________ GmbH against this decision on 27 February 2026. A.________ GmbH then filed a civil appeal with the Federal Supreme Court and requested the annulment of the bankruptcy and, subsidiarily, the remittance to the lower court.
Summary of Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court confirms the admissibility of the appeal and clarifies the scope of review. In ordinary appeal proceedings, the law is reviewed de novo. New facts and evidence are only admitted to a limited extent; genuine novelties are inadmissible. The appellant alleged a violation of the right to be heard because a submission dated 19 February 2026 was not considered by the Court of Appeal. The Federal Supreme Court held that this was procedurally correct since the appeal deadline had already expired. The Federal Supreme Court set out the requirements for proving liquidity according to Art. 174 para. 2 of the Swiss Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act (SchKG). Specifically, the debtor must prove that he has sufficient liquid means to meet his due debts. The lower court had found that A.________ GmbH was unable to pay due debts amounting to CHF 14,587.70 because no liquid assets were proven and thus its liquidity could not be credibly demonstrated. The Federal Supreme Court considers this assessment correct. The appeal is ultimately dismissed as neither a violation of the right to be heard nor an arbitrary finding of fact could be proven. The appellant's request for legal aid is also dismissed as the appeal is considered hopeless.
Summary of Dispositive
The appeal is dismissed and the request for legal aid is rejected. The court costs are imposed on the appellant.
5A_779/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning maintenance issues after separation
Summary of Facts
A.________ and B.________, married since 2013, have two children together. After their separation in May 2019, the separate living arrangements and maintenance obligations for the children were set in two decisions by the Civil Court of the District of La Côte. A.________ filed several legal remedies, including against the obligation to pay child support and the issuance of a debtor notice. His request for measures, including the introduction of alternating custody and adjustment of maintenance payments, was dismissed by the cantonal authorities.
Summary of Considerations
The appeal meets the formal requirements. Constitutional complaints can only be raised against first-instance measures. The interventions must be justified in detail; mere expressions of opinion are insufficient. The appellant alleged insufficient investigation of the respondent's income. The principle of equivalence between natural and monetary maintenance was examined, and the Federal Supreme Court found the lower court's reasoning not arbitrary. Regarding the reduction of working hours, A.________ invoked the care of his newborn child. The lower court concluded that he had not sufficiently sought an alternative solution (e.g., childcare). This assessment was confirmed. The application of hypothetical income was examined. Since A.________ could not prove that the reduction of his income was absolutely necessary, the attribution was confirmed, including retroactively. Transport and parking costs were not recognized because no indispensable necessity for a vehicle was evident. The rental costs for a parking space were not considered for similar reasons as in E.6. A.________ argued that the debtor notice impaired his subsistence minimum. However, since no additional items were recognized, this criticism is unfounded. The refusal of legal aid due to lack of prospects of success was contested. The court found that the lower court had inadequately justified this and remitted the matter for renewed examination.
Summary of Dispositive
The appeal is partially upheld. The decision on legal aid is lifted and remitted to the lower court for renewed examination. Court costs are imposed on the appellant, and a reduced party compensation is awarded to him.
6F_3/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revision of a non-admission decision
Summary of Facts
The petitioner was convicted by penal order of the Public Prosecutor's Office Frauenfeld for property damage with significant damage and trespassing. After his objection was declared withdrawn by the District Court Frauenfeld, the Federal Supreme Court did not admit a later appeal. With a new petition, the petitioner requested the revision of this non-admission decision.
Summary of Considerations
- **E.1:** The Federal Supreme Court explains that decisions of this court generally acquire legal force and can only be revised under certain, exhaustively regulated statutory conditions (Art. 121-123 BGG). It refers to the requirements for a revision petition, especially naming a statutory ground for revision.
- **E.2:** In the present case, the petitioner does not demonstrate a statutory ground for revision and essentially repeats objections that were already subject of the previous proceedings. Therefore, the petition is deemed inadmissible.
- **E.3:** The Federal Supreme Court emphasizes that it is not competent for criminal complaints.
- **E.4:** Due to the obvious inadmissibility of the petition, it is not admitted; an order for costs is exceptionally waived.
- **E.5:** It is expressly pointed out that further obviously inadmissible revision petitions in this matter may remain without formal treatment.
Summary of Dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court does not admit the revision petition and imposes no costs. The judgment is communicated to the relevant parties in writing.
5A_18/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning subject-matter jurisdiction in the interpretation of a building lease contract
Summary of Facts
The appellant (Political Municipality U.________) is entitled by virtue of a building lease contract to operate a first aid station on a property owned by the respondent (Secondary School District Municipality U.________). The dispute concerns the legal classification of this contract as either private law or public law. This dispute was assessed differently before the cantonal authorities.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9C_309/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning pension entitlement through disability insurance
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ (born 1964) registered with the disability insurance in 2015 due to a recurrent depressive disorder. The IV office of the Canton of Zurich rejected the pension application in 2017. Upon reapplication in 2018, the health situation remained unchanged, so this pension application was also rejected. Following a remand by the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich, a new assessment including a psychiatric expert report by Dr. med. C.________ was conducted. The IV office concluded that there was still no claimable deterioration. The Zurich Social Insurance Court confirmed this assessment in 2025.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
2C_731/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning exclusion of an Algerian national
Summary of Facts
An Algerian national (A.________), whose asylum application was finally rejected, filed together with a Turkish national (B.________) an application for a residence permit for the purpose of marriage preparation. In parallel, A.________ was criminally charged for repeated offenses and violations of the Narcotics Act. The Migration Office of the Canton of Solothurn ordered a two-year exclusion from the canton, which was confirmed by the Administrative Court of the Canton of Solothurn. An appeal was filed against this.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_284/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning sentencing and expulsion
Summary of Facts
A.________ was convicted by the District Court Zurich (2019) inter alia for multiple sexual acts with children and multiple pornography offenses. After appeals by various parties, the Zurich Court of Appeal (2021 and again in 2024 after remand by the Federal Supreme Court) sentenced A.________ to a total imprisonment of 45 months for rape, multiple sexual acts with children, and pornography and pronounced an expulsion order. With an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, A.________ requested among other things a reduction of the prison sentence and waiver of the expulsion order.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9C_185/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning provisions in tax law
Summary of Facts
The taxpayer A.________, partner of the simple partnership "B.________", is economically domiciled in the Canton of Aargau. The partnership owns a development which in 2013 recorded provisions of 3.5 million francs for future major renovations. The Cantonal Tax Office Aargau assessed the amounts as unfounded. Objections, appeals, and complaints followed, all dismissed, most recently by the Administrative Court of the Canton of Aargau.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
4A_51/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning liability and costs
Summary of Facts
A.________ SA (appellant) filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against a decision of the Civil Chamber of the Court of the Canton of Geneva dated 15 December 2025. The dispute concerned civil liability as well as questions of costs and compensation. After a settlement between the parties, the appellant withdrew her appeal.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_247/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal aid and advance payment
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ was appointed official counsel in an appeal procedure and requested a reassessment of the compensation fixed by the Directorate of Justice and the Interior of the Canton of Zurich before the Federal Supreme Court. He also filed a request for legal aid and for a renewed extension of the deadline for payment of the advance on costs.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_209/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning request for revision
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ filed an appeal against the judgment of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern dated 9 March 2026. The mentioned cantonal judgment declared inadmissible a request for revision of an earlier judgment dated 19 March 2019. The background is a dispute with the Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA) relating to an accident in 2015, for which benefits were discontinued by decision of 19 July 2017.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_1184/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning escorted outings in penal enforcement
Summary of Facts
The appellant, A.________, was sentenced in 2019 to 18 years’ imprisonment for attempted murder and to outpatient therapy under Art. 63 of the Swiss Penal Code. She is currently serving her sentence in the penitentiary institution U.________. By order of 24 February 2025, the Office of Penal Enforcement of the Canton of Zurich rejected her request for escorted outings and terminated the outpatient therapy due to lack of cooperation. An appeal and complaint to the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich were unsuccessful. The appellant filed a submission with the Federal Supreme Court requesting permission for the outings.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
1C_172/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning file inspection and advance on costs
Summary of Facts
The appellant requested electronic inspection of files in completed appeal proceedings of the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Zurich. This was denied by the Court of Appeal, after which she lodged a complaint with the Administrative Court. The Administrative Court requested an advance on costs, which was not paid by the appellant in time, so the complaint was not admitted. Two appeals filed with the Federal Supreme Court concern the order for advance on costs and the non-admission decision.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
2C_698/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning skipping the second kindergarten year
Summary of Facts
The Federal Supreme Court deals with the appeal of A.A.________, represented by her parents, regarding the rejection of a request to skip the second kindergarten year. The primary school board and the district council Dielsdorf dismissed the request and the appeal. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich also denied the admissibility of skipping by judgment of 30 October 2025. Meanwhile, the family of U.________ moved to W.________, resulting in a change of jurisdiction of the school authority.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_826/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning legal aid and security deposit
Summary of Facts
A.________ (appellant) requested modification of a divorce judgment regarding custody of the son, adjustment of child support, and reimbursement of overpaid maintenance. In the proceedings, he applied for legal aid. At the same time, B.________ (respondent 1) requested a security deposit for her legal costs. The Regional Court Emmental-Oberaargau rejected the appellant's request for legal aid and ordered a security deposit. The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Bern confirmed these decisions.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_412/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning sexual acts with children
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.A.________ was convicted in first instance for multiple sexual acts with children and sexual coercion to a conditional custodial sentence and a fine. These acts concerned incidents in 2007 and 2008 during which he performed sexual acts on his then minor half-sister. The Court of Appeal confirmed the convictions but reduced the probation period and waived the fine. With the appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, A.A.________ requested annulment of the appellate judgment and remittance of the matter to the lower court for a new decision.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9C_302/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning cantonal taxes and federal direct tax
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ filed an appeal against a judgment of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Graubünden concerning cantonal taxes and federal direct tax for the tax periods 2019–2020. The disputes concerned income and assets in Italy, employment income, and the collection of church tax.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
2C_30/2025: Upholding the appeal concerning minimum wage ordinance of the city of Winterthur
Summary of Facts
The city of Winterthur issued a minimum wage ordinance on 6 March 2023, which was adopted in a popular vote but not yet implemented. The ordinance aims to protect employees from working poverty and sets a minimum wage of CHF 23 per hour. The ordinance was annulled by the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich because it was allegedly contrary to cantonal law. The city of Winterthur then filed an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_437/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning challenge request against senior judges
Summary of Facts
The appellant has initiated two appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Bern. By requests dated 21 April 2026, he challenged the participation of senior judges Zbinden, Wuillemin, and Falkner. The Court of Appeal dismissed the challenge requests by decision of 4 May 2026. The appellant filed an appeal against this decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5D_55/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning provisional measures to restore a right of way
Summary of Facts
The appellants (A.________ and B.________) are owners of a property over which a right of way in favor of the property of the respondents (C.________ and D.________) is registered. The respondents noticed a narrowing of the access path and requested provisional measures from the Regional Court to restore the original condition of the path. The Regional Court granted the request. The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Bern dismissed the appeal against this. The appellants filed a subsidiary constitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
1C_242/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning demolition order
Summary of Facts
A.A.________ and B.A.________, owners of a parcel in La Neuveville, erected several installations without a building permit, including outdoor lighting, walls, and an external staircase. After contentious proceedings, the municipality decided to remove these structures unless a corresponding building permit was obtained retroactively. The spouses filed both a request for a building permit and an appeal against the demolition order. The latter was dismissed by both the cantonal authority and the cantonal administrative court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_1096/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning garnishment of income from care of relatives
Summary of Facts
A.________, employed by a Spitex organization caring for her sick husband, opposes a garnishment of her income by the debt enforcement office Winterthur-Stadt. The lower instances, the District Court Winterthur and the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Zurich, dismissed her appeal against the garnishment order. The appellant requested the Federal Supreme Court to declare the garnishment null and void or, alternatively, to lift the garnishment. She argued that the income was exempt from garnishment as support within the meaning of Art. 92 para. 1 no. 8 SchKG or that the garnishment was unlawful.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_165/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning sexual acts with children and sexual harassment
Summary of Facts
The respondent was acquitted by the first instance and the lower court of the allegations of sexual acts with his daughter A.A.________. She allegedly reported touching in the intimate area by the father, which, however, were not sufficiently substantiated from the perspective of the lower court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_1019/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning proper service of a payment order
Summary of Facts
In a debt enforcement procedure based on a claim of CHF 347,770.–, a payment order was notified to A.________. The payment order was handed to A.________’s 16-year-old stepdaughter while he was abroad. A.________ contested the proper service of the payment order and requested its annulment. The cantonal supervisory authority dismissed his appeal due to missed deadline.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_703/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning objection in accident insurance law
Summary of Facts
The respondent A.________, represented by an attorney, filed an objection against a SUVA decision. The SUVA considered the objection insufficiently justified. After SUVA granted the respondent a deadline until 8 May 2025, she submitted her supplemented objection only on 26 May 2025, whereupon SUVA did not admit it. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern obliged SUVA to admit the objection. SUVA appealed for annulment of the cantonal decision and confirmation of the non-admission.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_456/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning sentencing, revocation of conditional sentence, expulsion, and SIS listing
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.A. was convicted by the District Court Aarau on 27 October 2022 for multiple frauds, various traffic offenses, multiple violations of the Narcotics Act, and assaults. He was sentenced to 4.5 years imprisonment and expelled from the country for 6 years. On appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Aargau reduced the prison sentence to 2.5 years but maintained the expulsion and the listing in the Schengen Information System (SIS). The appellant challenges sentencing, revocation of a conditional prior sentence, expulsion, and SIS listing before the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_867/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning child maintenance contributions
Summary of Facts
A.________ committed in the 2013 divorce judgment to pay child maintenance contributions. Subsequently, he was granted retroactively IV child pensions. He requested the lifting of his maintenance obligation. After the District Court and the Court of Appeal dismissed the lawsuit and appeal, and partly closed the proceedings, A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_782/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning auction conditions in foreclosure proceedings
Summary of Facts
The Debt Enforcement Office Maloja conducted a real estate foreclosure procedure involving several condominium units and associated parking spaces. A.________ AG appealed against the auction conditions, particularly regarding the separate valuation of the combined properties and the inclusion of parking spaces in the auction. The lower court (Court of Appeal of the Canton of Graubünden, Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Chamber) partially upheld the appeal concerning auction modalities and rejected the other requests.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_360/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning enforcement of garnishment
Summary of Facts
The appellant was subjected to debt enforcement for tax claims. After service of the payment order and announcement of garnishment, he refused the proper execution of the garnishment. The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Bern did not admit the appellant's appeal for lack of sufficient reasoning. With his appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, the appellant argued that the legal remedy instruction was deficient but failed to provide sufficient reasoning.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
2C_28/2025: Upholding the appeal concerning admissibility of a municipal minimum wage ordinance
Summary of Facts
On 1 March 2023, the city council of Zurich adopted a minimum wage ordinance as a counter-proposal to the popular initiative "A Wage to Live On". After its adoption in the popular vote on 18 June 2023, an appeal by association A.________ against this ordinance was dismissed by the district council Zurich. However, the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich declared the ordinance inadmissible on 17 September 2024 and annulled it due to alleged incompatibility with cantonal law. The city of Zurich filed an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_304/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning social assistance proceedings
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ challenged a decision of the Social Commission of the city of Adliswil, which was the subject of proceedings before the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich. This court confirmed the dismissal of the proceedings by the district council Horgen following a reconsideration of the original decision by the Social Commission.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_397/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning payment order and restoration of the opposition deadline
Summary of Facts
The appellant filed a complaint with the Supervisory Authority for Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy of the Canton of Solothurn against a payment order and requested restoration of the opposition deadline. The Supervisory Authority did not admit the submission due to lateness.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_119/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning provisional registration of a construction lien
Summary of Facts
The appellant requested the provisional registration of a construction lien over CHF 71,872.17 plus interest on a property of the respondent. The Commercial Court of the Canton of Zurich as lower court rejected the request on the grounds that a balance agreement concluded between the appellant and his client had already been fulfilled.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_619/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning compensation for official defense
Summary of Facts
Attorney A.________ was appointed as official defender of B.________. For his work, he issued a bill of costs amounting to CHF 38,417.30 but was compensated only CHF 22,186.20 in first instance. After an unsuccessful appeal proceeding before the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Aargau, he filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court against the upheld judgment.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
8C_27/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning daily allowances and disability pension
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________, born in 1975 and last employed as a maître d’, suffered an accident with severe injuries on 23 August 2021. SWICA Assurances SA initially granted daily allowances but reduced them due to the accident's circumstances and finally discontinued benefits as of 30 November 2023. Furthermore, no disability pension was granted but an integrity compensation of 52%. After appeal proceedings before the Social Insurance Court of the Cantonal Court of Valais (decision of 27 November 2025), the insured filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting in particular the resumption of daily allowances and the granting of a disability pension based on a disability degree of at least 58%.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_422/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning activity compensation after acquittal
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ requested activity compensation under Art. 429 para. 1 lit. a of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code after acquittal by the Criminal Court Basel-Stadt, which was not admitted by the Criminal Court. His appeal against this decision was dealt with by the Court of Appeal Basel-Stadt, which closed the exchange of submissions without further decision. A.________ filed an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court citing an alleged denial of justice.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_249/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning adjustment of personal contact arrangements
Summary of Facts
The appellant (A.________) and the respondent (B.________) are the parents of a son born in 2019. The question of the father's right to personal relations was regulated by earlier court decisions. The appellant contested the adjustment of the modalities of personal contact before the Cantonal Court Fribourg, but her appeal was declared inadmissible. She then filed a further appeal with the Federal Supreme Court to challenge the cantonal decision and the refusal of legal aid.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_358/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning bankruptcy inventory
Summary of Facts
The Seeland bankruptcy office sent the bankruptcy inventory to A.________ GmbH in liquidation for review and signature. After no reaction from the appellant, a renewed order was issued, against which the appellant filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Bern. The Court of Appeal did not admit the appeal for lack of sufficient reasoning. The appellant then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7B_1006/2023: Non-admission of the appeal concerning non-admission of a criminal complaint for usury
Summary of Facts
The proceedings concern the appeal of the two appellants A._______ and B._______ against the non-admission of a criminal complaint for usury by the Ministry of the Republic and Canton of Geneva and against a related decision of the Chambre pénale de recours of the Cour de justice in Geneva. The appellants, beneficiaries of a Liechtenstein foundation, had filed a criminal complaint against their former lawyer for allegedly excessive fee claims. The lower court partially dismissed the appeal against the non-admission and partially confirmed its rejection.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_846/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning a claims lawsuit of a condominium owners’ association
Summary of Facts
The appellant (A.________) owns an apartment and a parking space in the condominium owners’ association B.________. The dispute concerns outstanding claims from communal costs and rent for a cellar room. After filing the lawsuit with the first instance, the District Court Lucerne partially upheld the claim. The appellant's appeal was dismissed by the Cantonal Court Lucerne. The appellant then filed a civil appeal and a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
7F_25/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revision petition in criminal proceedings
Summary of Facts
The petitioner A.________ requested reconsideration or annulment of the Federal Supreme Court judgment 7B_461/2025 of 25 June 2025, which did not admit his appeal against the order of pre-trial detention. The revision petition was filed on 18 April 2026.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9F_28/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revision petition in a disability insurance matter
Summary of Facts
The petitioner (A.________) filed a revision petition against a Federal Supreme Court judgment of 18 November 2025, with which the Court did not admit her original appeal against a decision of the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich. The non-admission decision was based on the fact that the formal requirements for an appeal were not met.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_452/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning release of files
Summary of Facts
The appellant requested the complete release of his files from the Debt Enforcement Office of the Landquart region. The office made the files available for inspection but linked the service to an advance on costs. The appellant filed a complaint with the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Graubünden, which dismissed it. The appellant then filed a civil appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_1094/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning avis aux débiteurs and securities to secure maintenance contributions
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ was ordered by British courts to pay monthly maintenance contributions to the mother of his child B.________, including contributions for education and tuition fees. Upon the child reaching majority, securities and avis aux débiteurs were requested and partially ordered by the Tribunal de première instance of the Canton of Geneva. A.________ appealed this decision. The lower court, the Civil Court of the Canton of Geneva, partially upheld the original orders and reduced the amount of securities.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
5A_955/2025: Non-admission of the appeal concerning revaluation of a property
Summary of Facts
B.________ AG initiated a foreclosure for real estate enforcement against the appellant A.________. The Debt Enforcement Office Uznach valued A.________’s property at CHF 3,820,000.–. The valuation was reported to the appellant for collection on 13 May 2025. On 19 June 2025, A.________ filed a request for revaluation, which the District Court See-Gaster classified as late and dismissed on 30 July 2025. The Cantonal Court St. Gallen confirmed this decision on 8 October 2025. A.________ then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
6B_622/2024: Non-admission of the appeal concerning multiple defilement and sentencing
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ was convicted by the District Court Aarau inter alia for multiple defilement, multiple sexual acts with a child, and other offenses under the Swiss Penal Code and sentenced to an unconditional prison term of four years, an unconditional fine, expulsion for seven years, and other ancillary penalties and measures. The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Aargau partly acquitted him and specified the offenses but essentially confirmed the penalty, the expulsion, and the cost ruling.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.
9C_303/2026: Non-admission of the appeal concerning discretionary tax assessment
Summary of Facts
A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against a judgment of the Cantonal Court of Graubünden dated 31 March 2026. The dispute concerned the legality of the non-admission decision of the tax authority of Graubünden on an objection filed by A.________ against a discretionary tax assessment for the tax periods 2021/2022. The objection was filed because A.________ had not submitted a tax return during the relevant periods.
Full summary of the judgment is available in the portal.