Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present you with detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts in each case. The complete summaries of all judgments are available on the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments tailored to your areas of law.
7B_399/2026: Non-admission of the complaint regarding compensation for court-appointed defense
Summary of the Facts
A.________ lodged a complaint against a decision of the Higher Court of the Canton of Bern concerning compensation for court-appointed defense. The complaint was withdrawn on April 27, 2026.
Summary of the Considerations
- E.1: Due to the withdrawal of the complaint pursuant to Art. 32 para. 2 BGG, the proceedings are dismissed as moot. - E.2: Court costs are fixed at CHF 300.--.
Summary of the Dispositive
The proceedings were dismissed due to withdrawal of the complaint and A.________ was ordered to bear the court costs.
1C_189/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning driver's license revocation
Summary of the Facts
In the Canton of Valais, A.________'s driver's license was permanently revoked pursuant to Art. 16c para. 2 lit. e SVG. A.________ filed a complaint with the State Council of Valais but failed to pay the required cost advance on time. His subsequent application for legal aid was also submitted after the deadline. The State Council declared the complaint inadmissible. This decision was finally confirmed by the cantonal administrative court. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, which decided the present case.
Summary of the Considerations
- E.1: A.________'s driver's license was permanently revoked. The deadline granted for payment of the cost advance was not met, and his belated application for legal aid was rejected as it was also submitted too late. - E.2: The Federal Supreme Court finds that the appellant is entitled to file a complaint under Art. 82 et seq. BGG as he is personally affected by the decision. The complaint was filed within the deadline. - E.3: The cantonal court correctly determined that the appellant’s requests were submitted after the deadlines, although he was clearly informed about the deadlines and consequences. The omission does not constitute a formal or legal error on the part of the lower courts. - E.4: A violation of Art. 29a BV (right to access a court) was rejected as the conditions of legality and equality of application of the law were met. - E.5: The complaint was therefore dismissed pursuant to Art. 109 para. 2 lit. a BGG. No court costs were imposed.
Summary of the Dispositive
The complaint is dismissed insofar as it is admissible, and no court costs are charged.
8C_220/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning precautionary measures
Summary of the Facts
The IV office of Schwyz revoked A.________'s disability pension by order and withdrew any suspensive effect of a possible complaint. The administrative court of the Canton of Schwyz dismissed in an interim decision A.________'s requests for reinstatement of the suspensive effect and for precautionary financial measures. A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court against this.
Summary of the Considerations
This concerns exclusively precautionary measures. In such cases, the Federal Supreme Court only examines a possible violation of constitutional rights (Art. 42 para. 2 in conjunction with Art. 98 and Art. 106 para. 2 BGG). Moreover, this is an interim decision under Art. 93 BGG, which is only possible if an irreparable legal disadvantage can be asserted. A.________ did not allege a sufficiently specific violation of such rights nor did she assert a legal disadvantage pursuant to Art. 93 BGG. General references to Art. 12 and 29 BV are insufficient. A provisional withdrawal of financial benefits does not constitute a legal disadvantage, as a subsequent payment would be possible in the event of success on the merits. The appellant is criticized for lack of reasoning; therefore, the Federal Supreme Court does not enter into the complaint in the simplified procedure under Art. 108 para. 1 lit. b BGG. The application for legal aid is dismissed due to the lack of prospects of success pursuant to Art. 64 para. 1 BGG. However, no court costs are charged as an exception (Art. 66 para. 1 sentence 2 BGG).
Summary of the Dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court did not enter into the complaint, dismissed the application for legal aid, and imposed no court costs.
7B_312/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning inadmissible appeal
Summary of the Facts
On March 2, 2026, A.________ filed a criminal complaint against a decision of the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court dated February 6, 2026. This chamber had previously declared A.________'s appeal against a judgment of the district court of the Est vaudois arrondissement dated November 27, 2025 inadmissible because the appeal had been filed late.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
1C_205/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning dismantling works and legal aid
Summary of the Facts
The appellant requested the cessation of dismantling works on a parcel in Sarnen and the granting of legal aid. The administrative court of the Canton of Obwalden did not admit her submissions, reasoning that the legal matters were settled and no proceedings existed for which legal aid could be granted.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
5A_24/2026: Non-admission of the complaint regarding income garnishment
Summary of the Facts
The Obwalden debt enforcement office conducted a subsistence minimum calculation in July 2025 and issued an income garnishment order. After changed income circumstances were noted in September 2025, the debt enforcement office revised the garnishment and ordered a repayment to the debtor. The creditor in the proceedings, A.________ AG, filed a complaint which was dismissed by the Obwalden Higher Court. The appellant then filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8C_736/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning suspension of entitlement due to self-inflicted unemployment
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was suspended from entitlement by the unemployment insurance fund of the Canton of Zurich for 36 days due to self-inflicted unemployment (order dated November 17, 2023). His objection was dismissed by decision dated July 12, 2024. The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich stayed the subsequent complaint proceedings. Later, the fund refused payment of daily allowances for the suspension period by order dated August 21, 2025. An objection was raised against this, which was rejected on September 23, 2025. The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich dismissed the complaint on November 10, 2025, insofar as it was admissible.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
5A_25/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning revision of income garnishment
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on a civil complaint by A.________ AG against the revision order of the Obwalden debt enforcement office dated November 6, 2025, and the corresponding decision of the Obwalden Higher Court dated December 22, 2025. The subject was the adjustment of the debtor B.________’s garnishable income quota due to changed income circumstances. The appellant requested, inter alia, the annulment of the revision order and the conduct of further investigations.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_335/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning entry ban due to criminal connections
Summary of the Facts
A.________, an Italian citizen, was repeatedly convicted in Italy, including for his ties to the criminal organization 'Ndrangheta. Based on this information, Swiss authorities revoked his residence status and fedpol imposed a 20-year entry ban on him. The Federal Administrative Court reduced this entry ban to 20 years. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court requesting the lifting or reduction of the ban to five years.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_124/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning residence permit after divorce
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a Bosnian-Herzegovinian national, married French national B.________ in 2019. In 2021, as part of family reunification, the authorities of the Canton of Vaud granted A.________ a residence permit UE/EFTA. The marriage separated in 2022 and was dissolved in 2024, with B.________ having left Switzerland in 2022. Subsequently, the Canton of Vaud revoked A.________'s residence permit and ordered his expulsion. A.________ filed a complaint which was dismissed by the cantonal administrative court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
1C_159/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning public personnel law
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court against a judgment of the Federal Administrative Court (Division I, single judge). The latter, dated March 13, 2026, had declared the complaint against a letter from the Swiss Federal Railways SBB dated October 20, 2025, and a challenge request inadmissible, as the letter did not constitute an administrative act. The Federal Supreme Court examined whether the complaint met the requirements of reasoning and whether it could enter into the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_161/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning inadmissible claim for damages
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a claim for damages amounting to CHF 1,161,374.30 with the State Council of the Canton of Ticino on November 20, 2023, based on cantonal liability law. This claim was rejected on June 19, 2024. The appellant unsuccessfully appealed to the Ticino Administrative Court, which declared the complaint inadmissible on March 5, 2026. The reason was that the appellant had not followed the cantonal liability procedure. On March 14, 2026, he filed a complaint in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court, but it did not meet formal requirements.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8C_256/2025: Partial approval of the complaint concerning pension award and causality
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, suffered a motorcycle accident on July 13, 2018, resulting in significant bodily injuries. The Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA) granted him a disability pension starting April 1, 2023, based on a disability degree of 32% and a compensation for loss of integrity of 20%. SUVA did not recognize a natural or adequate causality between the accident and the subsequent psychological disorders. The cantonal decision dismissed the insured’s complaint.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
5A_23/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning revision of income garnishment
Summary of the Facts
The Obwalden debt enforcement office adjusted in September 2025 an income garnishment due to changed income circumstances of a debtor (B.________). The new garnishment order included a repayment of CHF 1,587.35 to the debtor. The creditor, A.________ AG, filed a complaint, which was dismissed by the Obwalden Higher Court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
7B_434/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning withdrawal of a complaint against a decision of the coercive measures court
Summary of the Facts
The appellant challenged a decision of the Coercive Measures Court Basel-Landschaft concerning an unsealing. After the complaint was withdrawn, the federal proceedings were dismissed.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
9D_6/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning tax assessment and tax waiver
Summary of the Facts
The taxpayer A.________, residing in U.________/SO, was definitively assessed for the cantonal and municipal taxes of the Canton of Solothurn as well as the direct federal tax for the 2023 tax period. His requests for tax waiver were rejected by both the municipality of residence and the Canton of Solothurn’s finance department. The Cantonal Tax Court Solothurn dismissed the appeals against the assessments on January 26, 2026, but noted that there was no appealable decision regarding the municipal tax. The taxpayer’s complaints against these two judgments before the Federal Supreme Court were submitted late.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
9C_166/2025: Approval of the complaint concerning IV benefits
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a new revision of his IV benefits on March 13, 2024, based on reports of deterioration in his health condition. The IV office rejected the examination of the revision on June 10, 2024. The Vaud Cantonal Court confirmed this decision on February 6, 2025. The appellant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, which overturned the previous decisions and remanded the case to the IV office for further examination.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8C_691/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning entitlement to unemployment compensation
Summary of the Facts
The 1999-born A.________ completed a Master’s degree in biology in June 2024 and applied for unemployment compensation in October 2024. The unemployment insurance fund rejected the claim because the minimum contribution period was not met and no exemption applied. However, the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich overturned this decision and found that A.________ was exempt from fulfilling the contribution period due to his full-time studies (Art. 14 para. 1 lit. a AVIG).
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8C_349/2025: Approval of the complaint concerning disability pension
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a helper mason born in 1969, suffered a work accident on September 17, 2019, resulting in polytrauma with multiple fractures. After completing medical and economic assessments, the accident insurance (CNA) set a disability pension of 13% and a loss of integrity compensation of 35%. The lower court, the Cour de justice of the Canton of Geneva, increased the disability degree to 18%. CNA challenged this by filing a complaint.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
6B_442/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning attempted sexual acts with children
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was convicted by the Regional Court of Plessur on November 10, 2023, inter alia for sexual acts with children, multiple sexual harassment, and other offenses. The Graubünden Higher Court specified the convictions on March 19, 2025, and additionally ordered a five-year expulsion from the country. A.________ appealed the judgment, especially contesting the conviction for attempted sexual acts with children, the sentencing, and the expulsion.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
6B_27/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning fraud and forgery
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, was convicted by the Court of Appeal of Basel-Stadt for having made false statements regarding turnover in connection with a Covid-19 loan application. She had applied for a Covid-19 loan of CHF 290,000, stating a turnover of 2.9 million CHF which was not factual. The actual turnover entitled her to a loan of only CHF 88,560.97. The Court of Appeal sentenced her for fraud and forgery to a conditional prison sentence of 9 months, a conditional fine (45 daily rates of CHF 30), and ordered her to repay the unjustly obtained amount of CHF 196,839.94 to the injured party B.________.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
9F_9/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning a revision request in a tax matter
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed a revision request to annul the Federal Supreme Court judgment 9C_165/2026 of March 10, 2026, which had dismissed a complaint. The dispute concerned tax recognition of costs from 2018 (notably flight and attorney costs) which the Tax Administration of the Canton of Thurgau either did not or only partially accepted as deductions. The Federal Supreme Court examined whether there were sufficient grounds for revision.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
1C_328/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning approval of changes to the intermunicipal zoning plan
Summary of the Facts
This concerns approval of the changes of development phase 1 of the intermunicipal zoning plan for the new urban quarter of Cornaredo (PR-NQC) of the municipalities of Canobbio, Lugano, and Porza. The original planning instrument was updated due to legal changes, notably abolishing the previously existing optional neighborhood plan instrument. A.________ and B.________ AG filed complaints with the Federal Supreme Court against the final cantonal decision, which among other things did not provide for a mandatory neighborhood plan obligation for the southern part of zone B2b.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_41/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning cross-border commuter permit
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, an Italian citizen, applied in 2024 for a cross-border commuter permit UE/EFTA for a dependent activity in Switzerland. The competent authorities of the Canton of Ticino rejected the application because public interests were affected due to his criminal convictions in Italy and Switzerland. The rejection order was confirmed by the State Council and the Administrative Court of Ticino.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
9C_503/2024: Non-admission of the complaint concerning input tax deduction of a holding company
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, a holding company registered for VAT since 2015, disputed with the Federal Tax Administration (FTA) the input tax deduction for the tax periods 2018-2020. The FTA denied the deduction because no entrepreneurial activity within the meaning of the VAT Act (MWSTG) existed. The dispute concerned whether a 9% shareholding in an AG and loans to another AG qualified as participations under Art. 29 MWSTG. The Federal Administrative Court confirmed the FTA’s position.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_169/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning exam duration and catalogue data
Summary of the Facts
A professor at ETH Zurich (appellant) requested a uniform fixing of the exam duration and catalogue data for his course. After initial refusal by the study dean’s office and the ETH appeals commission, the exam duration and entries in the lecture directory were adjusted during the appeal proceedings. Nevertheless, the appellant requested a determination of the unlawfulness of the initial refusal.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_677/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning cost advance
Summary of the Facts
A Paris-based lawyer, A.________, filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court against a decision of the Cour de justice of the Canton of Geneva. The appellant requested annulment of the preliminary decision which had declared his original complaint inadmissible due to failure to pay a cost advance. A.________ argued that no suitable payment options were provided, particularly for payments from France.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
5D_12/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning determination of debt
Summary of the Facts
The appellant wanted to have it determined before the Zurich District Court pursuant to Art. 85a SchKG that no debt existed. The claim was dismissed. The Zurich Higher Court did not enter into a complaint filed against this decision nor on a challenge request. The appellant filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint before the Federal Supreme Court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
6B_708/2024: Non-admission of the complaint concerning rape and sexual acts with children
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court dealt with a complaint by A.________ against a judgment of the Higher Court of the Canton of Bern, which had convicted him inter alia for rape, sexual acts with children, incest, and multiple sexual coercion to a prison sentence of 10 years and a conditional fine of 30 daily rates. A.________ requested acquittal or subsidiarily the remittance of the matter to the lower court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
7B_488/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning reinstatement of the deadline for filing an objection against a penal order
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed a complaint against the decision of the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court dated March 16, 2026, which dismissed her request for reinstatement of the deadline to file an objection against a penal order.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8C_580/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning inadmissible opposition
Summary of the Facts
The Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (CNA) issued a billing decision on November 10, 2022, to A.________ Sàrl concerning insurance premiums for employees that the company had borrowed from other firms. The dispute centers on whether the opposition against this decision was duly raised, as a specific written authorization from the representative was not submitted within the deadline. CNA declared the opposition inadmissible. The cantonal instance initially overturned this decision, which the Federal Supreme Court partially corrected on January 31, 2025, by remanding the question of correct notification of the authorization request to the lower court. Ultimately, on September 4, 2025, the Cantonal Court confirmed CNA’s decision, leading to the present complaint.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_230/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning asylum application
Summary of the Facts
The Algerian national A.________ filed an asylum application in Switzerland on February 21, 2023. After the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) determined Italy’s responsibility, his application was initially rejected. Subsequently, there were several criminal convictions and a reopening of the asylum proceedings, which ultimately resulted in a negative decision. On April 10, 2026, the Canton of Valais’s Population and Migration Service ordered administrative detention for three months. This was confirmed by the single judge of the Valais Cantonal Court on April 14, 2026.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
6B_1007/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning civil claims after acquittal
Summary of the Facts
The respondent B.________ was acquitted by the Basel-Landschaft Criminal Court Presidium on August 27, 2024, of several charges (endangering life, assault, threat, insult, gross traffic rule violation). The civil claims of the appellant A.________ were dismissed. The Basel-Landschaft Cantonal Court partially overturned this decision and sentenced B.________ to a conditional fine for gross traffic rule violation but confirmed acquittals in other matters. By complaint, A.________ requests B.________ be found guilty also in the acquitted charges and ordered to pay satisfaction and damages.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
4A_127/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning insurance benefits
Summary of the Facts
B.________ had concluded an insurance contract with A.________ SA that provided accident coverage for passengers. After an accident involving his vehicle in which his wife died, B.________ claimed the insurance benefits. The insurer denied payment on the grounds that the wife was not a passenger at the time of the accident. Several instances decided on the dispute before it reached the Federal Supreme Court.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
7B_410/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning inadmissibility of appeal
Summary of the Facts
On March 28, 2026, A.________ filed a complaint against the decision of February 27, 2026, by the President of the Appeals Chamber of the Ticino Cantonal Court, which declared her appeal against a dismissal order by the Ticino Public Prosecutor’s Office dated January 29, 2026, inadmissible. The appellant requested a review of the complete file and damages of CHF 10,000. The Federal Criminal Court referred the complaint to the Federal Supreme Court for jurisdiction.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_235/2024: Non-admission of the complaint concerning subsequent family reunification
Summary of the Facts
A.A.________, originally a Lebanese national, was naturalized in 2022. In the same year, he reapplied for family reunification for his wife and three children after a similar request was rejected in 2021. The family had meanwhile entered Switzerland. Cantonal authorities rejected the new application citing absence of essential new facts.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
6B_805/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning desecration and sexual acts with children
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ was convicted by the Hinwil District Court of desecration and sexual acts with children and sentenced to imprisonment. The Zurich Higher Court confirmed the first-instance judgment and increased the prison sentence. A.________ appealed the higher court judgment by criminal complaint, requesting acquittal or milder punishment and especially contesting the factual findings, violation of the right to be heard, and arbitrary evaluation of evidence.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8C_664/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning insured earnings in unemployment insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, formerly an employee of his wife’s sole proprietorship, registered with unemployment insurance after the business closure. The unemployment fund initially fixed the insured earnings at CHF 2,767.-. This determination was confirmed after objection. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Thurgau dismissed the complaint, after which the appellant requested the Federal Supreme Court to fix the insured earnings at CHF 4,500.-.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
7B_448/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning detention extension
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, was arrested on suspicion of various property and document offenses (including commercial fraud, money laundering). He is accused of operating a Ponzi scheme for several years and having defrauded over CHF 25 million. After several extensions of pre-trial detention, the Tribunal des mesures de contrainte of the Canton of Geneva ordered continuation of detention until June 13, 2026, on February 10, 2026. A.________ appealed this decision, which was dismissed by the Geneva Criminal Appeals Chamber on March 5, 2026. A.________ requested the Federal Supreme Court to annul the lower court’s judgment and order his immediate release with substitute measures, as well as legal aid.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
8F_3/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning legal aid and cost advance
Summary of the Facts
The applicant A.________ filed a revision request against a Federal Supreme Court judgment dated May 2, 2024. He simultaneously requested legal aid. Legal aid was denied by order dated March 16, 2026, and a cost advance was demanded. The cost advance was not paid despite an extension.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
2C_354/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning settlement permit
Summary of the Facts
Two Italian nationals (A.A.________ and B.A.________) received B permits (EU/EFTA) for dependent employment in Switzerland in 2013. They applied in 2018 for settlement permits (C permits, EU/EFTA), which were rejected by the Ticino Department. The lower court found that the appellants had not proven regular and effective residence in Switzerland since October 2015, but mainly lived in Italy.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
1C_327/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning the approval of the intermunicipal master plan “New Urban Quarter Cornaredo”
Summary of the Facts
The appellants (A.________ and B.________ AG) opposed the approval confirmed by the Ticino Administrative Court of the variants Phase 1 of the intermunicipal master plan “New Urban Quarter Cornaredo” (PR-NQC). These variants concerned adjustment of the traffic plan and minor modification of road routing including widening of certain road sections. The appellants complained in particular of violations of property guarantee, the right to be heard, and the lack of proportionality of the measures.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
4A_213/2025: Non-admission of the complaint concerning contract interpretation and purchase price reduction
Summary of the Facts
Between 2010 and 2013, A.________ sold all his shares in D.________ SA to E.________ SA, whose sole shareholder was B.________. Later, A.________ partially bought back these shares before selling them again in 2018 under a contract to C.________ (trustee for B.________). The sale included detailed conditions regarding payments, interests, and additional compensations (“Earn-Out”). Parallelly, A.________ entered into an employment contract with D.________ SA, which was linked to certain clauses such as non-compete agreements. Disputes arose when A.________ terminated the employment contract, which according to the contractual clauses allegedly resulted in reductions of the purchase price.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.
7B_407/2026: Non-admission of the complaint concerning non-admission orders
Summary of the Facts
A.________ and B.________ filed four criminal complaints alleging various offenses against multiple persons. The Ministry for the Nord Vaudois Arrondissement issued corresponding non-admission orders on May 15, 2025. The appeals against these orders were dismissed by the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court on December 31, 2025. A.________ and B.________ then filed criminal complaints with the Federal Supreme Court on March 30, 2026.
You can find the full summary of the judgment in the portal.