Latest Federal Supreme Court Judgments
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and rulings. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts for each. The complete summaries of all judgments are available in the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your legal fields.
4A_310/2025: Lease Agreement: Unauthorized Use after Early Termination and Rent Reduction
Summary of the Facts
The procedure concerns disputes between the tenants (A.________ and B.________) and the landlord (C.________ SA) regarding a commercial lease for business premises. The tenants terminated the lease early as of 31 July 2021 due to repeated water intrusion and claimed a rent reduction as well as damages. The lower court declared the termination effective, reduced the rent for certain periods, and granted the tenants compensation for the dripping water. However, for the subsequent use of the premises until May 2024, the lower court awarded compensation to the landlord.
Summary of the Considerations
The proceedings 4A_310/2025 and 4A_318/2025 were combined. The formal and substantive prerequisites for handling the appeals are met. The Federal Supreme Court examines the application of federal law ex officio. However, the parties must substantiate essential complaints. The tenants’ early termination of the lease was deemed valid. The serious defect due to repeated water damage, which severely impaired the use of the rented objects, justified the immediate termination of the lease. Regarding the so-called “unjustified benefits” from further use of the premises after termination: Whether the tenants continued to benefit from the use of the insufficiently repaired rooms was insufficiently established. The previous instance must supplement this point. The tenants’ claim for the return of the bank guarantee was rejected due to lack of sufficient evidence. The amount of the rent reduction was not challenged as unlawful. The rent reduction to 70%, as requested by the tenants, was not justified.
Summary of the Rulings
The proceedings were combined, and the tenants’ appeal was partially granted. The case was remanded to the lower court for clarification, while the landlord’s appeal was dismissed. Costs were allocated accordingly, and the landlord was ordered to pay party compensation to the tenants.
7B_300/2026: Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Compensation of the Court-Appointed Defender
Summary of the Facts
The court-appointed defender A.________ had lodged an appeal against a decision of the lower court, the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court, concerning the compensation of the court-appointed defender. This appeal was withdrawn by the appellant by submission dated 9 March 2026.
Summary of the Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal. Pursuant to Art. 32 para. 2 BGG (Federal Supreme Court Act), the case is therefore dismissed as moot. No court costs are imposed (Art. 66 para. 1 sentence 2 BGG). Moreover, no compensation for party costs is granted (Art. 68 para. 3 BGG).
Summary of the Rulings
The appeal is withdrawn, the matter is dismissed, and no court costs are incurred.
2C_98/2026: Judgment on the Suspension of a Detention Review Procedure and Release from Custody
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________, a citizen of Burundi, was taken into deportation custody in Switzerland. The competent authorities aimed to enforce a return. The Migration and Civil Law Office of the Canton of Graubünden applied for extension of the deportation custody, which was granted. A.________ appealed to the Cantonal Supreme Court of Graubünden, which suspended the proceedings to await the outcome of a procedure before the Federal Administrative Court.
Summary of the Considerations
1. Admissibility of the Appeal (E. 1): The appeal is directed against an interlocutory decision. The Federal Supreme Court declared the appeal in public law matters admissible because a potential, irreparable disadvantage existed. 2. Acceleration Requirement in Detention Cases (E. 4): Art. 29 para. 1 BV (right to be heard within a reasonable time) and Art. 31 para. 4 BV (prompt detention review) were not observed. The suspension by the Supreme Court violated the special acceleration requirement in detention cases and constituted a disproportionate delay, especially since it was based on an insufficient prognosis. Coordination with the procedure before the Federal Administrative Court was not required in the detention review procedure as the decisive questions could be examined independently. 3. Lawfulness of the Release from Custody (E. 5): The suspension and procedural delay were serious procedural errors. As there was no indication of a significant threat to public security by the appellant, the Federal Supreme Court decided that he must be released from custody immediately.
Summary of the Rulings
The appeal was granted, the decisions of the lower court were annulled, and the appellant was released from custody immediately. No court costs were imposed, and the canton was ordered to compensate legal representation.
8C_355/2025: Judgment on Recusal Request against an Investigating Judge
Summary of the Facts
A. The appellant A.________, born in 1955, was granted a supplementary benefit to AHV/IV by the Compensation Office of the Canton of Bern amounting to CHF 2,006 per month. An objection against the decision was rejected. B. A recusal request for bias was filed by A.________ against the investigating judge of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern who handled his case. This was dismissed in the judgment of the Administrative Court dated 28 April 2025. C. A.________ lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court. He requested that the involved administrative judges be declared biased and that the main proceedings at the Administrative Court be suspended during the federal proceedings.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5D_9/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant initially requested the Regional Court Bern-Mittelland to remove a YouTube link and to prohibit further publication of a telephone conversation with respondent 1. After respondent 1 removed the recording, the appellant filed new motions including a claim for satisfaction. The Regional Court declared the removal request and cost orders moot. After a new cost note, the Regional Court fixed party compensation in favor of the respondents, against which the appellant appealed to the Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern. This court dismissed the appeal and only reviewed the amount of party compensation. The appellant subsequently lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_228/2026: Extension of Preventive Detention
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was sentenced by the Criminal Court of Lucerne for attempted intentional homicide and multiple violations of the Narcotics Act to a prison term of six and a half years and a twelve-year expulsion from the country. At the same time, the court extended the preventive detention. A.________ appealed to the Cantonal Court of Lucerne, which dismissed the appeal. Thereafter, A.________ applied to the Federal Supreme Court for annulment of the cantonal decision, release from preventive detention, possible substitute measures, and granting of legal aid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1353/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed a criminal complaint on behalf of her son against the medical staff of the Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV) for allegedly faulty treatment. The lower court, the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court, dismissed the appeal against the prosecutor’s decision of non-inquiry insofar as it admitted it. The appellant subsequently lodged a criminal appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_103/2026: Judgment on Appeal against an Administrative Measure under Road Traffic Law
Summary of the Facts
The Road Traffic Office of the Canton of Lucerne permanently revoked A.________'s driving license and foreign driving license, making reissuance conditional on certain requirements. This was based on an incident where A.________ drove a vehicle despite the license revocation. The Cantonal Court of Lucerne confirmed this administrative measure. A.________ then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_106/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
A.________ sued her former employer B.________ SA at the Tribunal des prud’hommes in Geneva after a failed conciliation. She requested to prohibit the defendant’s lawyer, Olivia Guyot Unger, from representing the defendant due to a conflict of interest. This request was dismissed by the Tribunal des prud’hommes on 5 September 2025. The cantonal appeal by the plaintiff was declared inadmissible by the Chambre des prud’hommes of the Cour de justice de Genève on 19 January 2026 due to lack of a serious irreparable disadvantage. A.________ then lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 28 February 2026, concurrently applying for legal aid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_256/2026: Dismissal of a Request for Release from Custody
Summary of the Facts
A.________ is accused, among other things, of attempted intentional homicide. He transported a loaded pistol and allegedly shot a victim in the leg on behalf of a third party. During the criminal investigation, he made false statements. A.________ was held in pre-trial detention, temporarily released under substitute measures, and re-detained due to new allegations. Various requests for release from custody were dismissed, most recently by the Cantonal Supreme Court of Zurich.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1309/2024: Court-Appointed Defense in Criminal Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on an appeal by A.________ who contested the non-appointment of his lawyer, Kim Mauerhofer, as court-appointed defense counsel. The Obwalden Public Prosecutor’s Office had initially pragmatically appointed Mauerhofer as court-appointed defense counsel, but only from March 2023. The Cantonal Supreme Court of Obwalden dismissed this decision and considered A.________ represented by retained counsel. A.________ requested the Federal Supreme Court to appoint Mauerhofer as court-appointed defense counsel retroactively from August 2022.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_806/2025: Decision Regarding Fraudulent Bankruptcy and Fraud in Debt Collection Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
A.A. and B.A., a married couple, operated through several corporate structures to develop a system to conceal A.A.’s income and assets from creditors. A.A. provided false information about his income and assets to the debt collection office over years, simulating financial insolvency. B.A. actively supported these deceptions. Both were convicted in lower courts, inter alia, under Art. 163 of the Criminal Code (fraudulent bankruptcy and fraud in debt collection proceedings). The Cantonal Public Prosecutor did not participate in the appeal, and the Cantonal Court partially reduced sentences considering a breach of the acceleration requirement.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_27/2024: Violation of the Narcotics Act and Sentencing
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was partially convicted by the Regional Court Berner Jura-Seeland of multiple and qualified violations of the Narcotics Act (BetmG), especially acquisition and sale of significant quantities of narcotics (cocaine and heroin). He was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. The Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern confirmed the first-instance judgment, after which A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court. He mainly requested acquittal regarding the asylum meeting for the import of 4,959.8 grams of heroin mixture and mitigation of the prison sentence.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_984/2024: Judgment on Expulsion and its Entry in the Schengen Information System Regarding Narcotics Offenses
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, a Laotian national residing in Switzerland, was convicted of multiple qualified violations of the Narcotics Act and other offenses. The Cantonal Supreme Court of Zurich sentenced him to imprisonment and ordered a seven-year expulsion with entry in the Schengen Information System (SIS). He appealed the expulsion and its duration, alleging, inter alia, violations of Art. 66a para. 2 StGB and Art. 8 ECHR.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_727/2025: Judgment on Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Rape and Sexual Acts with Minors
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was sentenced on 25 October 2023 by the Tribunal régional Jura bernois-Seeland for rape and sexual acts with minors to a prison term of 34 months, in addition to a previous 2016 judgment. Additionally, he was ordered to pay CHF 12,000 compensation for non-pecuniary harm and court costs. On 24 June 2025, the 2nd Criminal Chamber of the Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern dismissed A.________’s appeal and confirmed the judgment.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_150/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, holds a French residence permit valid until 12 March 2027. After the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) decided on 6 May 2025 not to examine his asylum application of 9 December 2024 and obliged him to leave Switzerland based on his French residence status, a ban on entry to Switzerland was imposed on him on 13 January 2026. The cantonal migration service of the Canton of Valais ordered deportation custody for three months on 19 January 2026, confirmed by the single judge of the Valais Cantonal Court on 22 January 2026. An earlier appeal to the Federal Supreme Court was declared inadmissible on 19 February 2026 due to lack of reasoning. Subsequently, A.________ again requested release, which was rejected by the Cantonal Court on 2 March 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_489/2023: Approval of the Partial Zoning and Design Plan "Riggenbachstrasse"
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ AG, majority owner of the Sälipark in Olten, plans rezoning and redesign of the area with new retail and residential spaces. The developed partial zoning and design plan "Riggenbachstrasse" was approved with modifications by the Government Council of the Canton of Solothurn in 2022 after various objection procedures, partly repealing existing design plans. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Solothurn annulled the government council decision, against which A.________ AG and the municipality of Olten appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_584/2025: Dismissal of Appeal Regarding DNA Analysis
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, a Senegalese national with multiple prior convictions, was observed in Geneva on 16 April 2025 handing over a small amount of cocaine. Subsequently, the Geneva Public Prosecutor ordered a DNA profile comparison on 17 April 2025 to clarify possible other offences. The Criminal Chamber of the Geneva Justice confirmed this order on 23 May 2025. The appellant appealed, citing, among other things, violations of various constitutional rights.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_242/2026: Non-Admission Decision Regarding a Protective Custody
Summary of the Facts
The Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) Seeland ordered the protective custody of A.________. Against the decision of the Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern as Child and Adult Protection Court dated 4 February 2026, the appellant lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court. She requested the annulment of the custody and the determination that the conditions for it were not met; she also requested a deadline for supplementing and elaborating her submission.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_988/2025: Challenge of a Bankruptcy Opening by Disempowered Board Members
Summary of the Facts
D.________ SA, FINMA's investigation officer, filed for bankruptcy opening against A.________ AG with the District Court of Schwyz. The District Court opened the bankruptcy on 3 June 2025. The board members B.________ and C.________, who had their signing authority revoked, appealed this decision. The Cantonal Court of Schwyz did not entertain the appeal and confirmed the bankruptcy opening. A.________ AG in liquidation appealed to the Federal Supreme Court in civil matters.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_269/2026: Judgment Regarding Wage Garnishment
Summary of the Facts
The appellant is subject to several debt collection proceedings. His income was garnished in garnishment groups. He challenged several subsistence minimum calculations, with the Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern rejecting his appeals. No costs were imposed, and the request for legal aid was denied.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_883/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, was convicted in lower courts inter alia for embezzlement, commercial fraud, forgery, violations of the Federal Act against Unfair Competition (UWG), and the Trademark Protection Act (MSchG) to a prison sentence of five years. He appealed against the judgment of the Cour d'appel pénale of the Cantonal Court of Vaud, which was rendered following a remand decision of the Federal Supreme Court. He requested, among other things, a reduction of the prison sentence to a maximum of three years with partial granting of conditional imprisonment and suspension of a fine.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_192/2026: Non-Admissibility Requirements in Interlocutory Decisions in Divorce Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed divorce proceedings with the District Court Dielsdorf. In the course of these proceedings, an expert report on parenting ability was ordered. The appellant submitted supplementary questions and requested the removal of a medical report from the files. The District Court dismissed the request and supplementary questions. This dismissal was confirmed by the Cantonal Supreme Court of Zurich. The appellant then lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_73/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) was requested by the Centre social régional de Nyon-Rolle to repay social assistance incorrectly received in the total amount of CHF 19,993.20. The cantonal authorities confirmed this. Against the decision of the cantonal court of 20 January 2026, the appellant lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting legal aid and partial coverage of the repayment costs.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_72/2026: Judgment on Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Attempted Rape
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was sentenced by the District Court Lausanne on 22 January 2025 for attempted rape to a prison term of two years with conditional execution and an eight-year expulsion with entry in the Schengen Information System (SIS). The Court of Appeal of the Canton of Vaud confirmed the judgment on 2 September 2025. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court to have the judgment annulled or revised.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_110/2025: Interpretation of the Lease Agreement
Summary of the Facts
The conflict concerns the interpretation of a lease agreement for an apartment between the plaintiff (A.________) and the deceased landlord (G.________), represented by his heirs. The main dispute is whether the lease was concluded by A.________ personally or by the holding company E.________ Holding SA, of which A.________ was sole director. The heirs of the original landlord demand outstanding rent payments of CHF 38,000 from A.________ personally, while A.________ claims that the holding was the contracting party.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_588/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Due to Late Filing
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ had lodged an appeal with the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Vaud, Social Insurance Division, against a notification from Assura-Basis SA dated 2 February 2024, according to which his mandatory health insurance coverage (LAMal) would remain retroactively effective from 1 April 2015. The cantonal court dismissed the appeal on 8 October 2025 due to late filing. Before the Federal Supreme Court, A.________ requested annulment of his retrospective insurance with Assura from 1 October 2017, recognition of his insurance with a foreign health insurer from that date, and reimbursement of allegedly unjustly paid premiums.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_114/2025: Inadmissibility of the Unilateral Tariff Adjustment
Summary of the Facts
A.________ Sàrl (plaintiff) requested reimbursement of fees, considering the unilateral tariff adjustment by B.________ SA (defendant) as inadmissible. The dispute arose from an account opening contract with the defendant bank, whose general terms and conditions (GTC) contained a unilateral right of amendment. The lower court dismissed the plaintiff’s claim after finding that the GTC and deposit regulations applied.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_115/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Against Expulsion
Summary of the Facts
A.A., a Tunisian national living in Switzerland since September 2022, was sentenced by the first-instance court in the Canton of Vaud for qualified coercion by robbery, qualified assault, insults, and qualified threats to a partially conditional prison sentence of 24 months, a fine, and a penalty. Additionally, his expulsion from Switzerland for five years was ordered. He appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting principally the annulment of the expulsion.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1368/2025: Decision on Party Status of a Victim Party in Criminal Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
A.________ made allegations against B.________ of sexual coercion but initially declared she did not want to file a criminal complaint. Later, through her lawyer, she stated she wished to claim the status of private plaintiff in criminal and civil proceedings. The cantonal court of Vaud decided on appeal by B.________ that A.________ did not have this status. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_484/2024: Mootness of the Appeal Due to Bankruptcy Opening
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had to decide on an appeal by A.________ SA in liquidation against a decision of the II Civil Appeals Chamber of the Cantonal Court of Fribourg. The case concerned provisional legal opening ordered by the President of the Civil Court of the Greyerz District on 21 March 2024. During the Federal Supreme Court proceedings, the appellant was declared bankrupt on 12 December 2024, leading to suspension of the proceedings.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_349/2025: Local Planning Revision on Roof Design in Protected Areas and Monuments
Summary of the Facts
The municipality of Köniz planned to liberalize its local building regulations, especially regarding roof design, as part of a local planning revision. However, the cantonal monument preservation authority requested stricter rules for roof structures and cuts in protected areas and monuments. After various adjustments, the cantonal office for municipalities and spatial planning approved a revision with an ex officio inserted stricter provision. The municipality finally contested this amendment before the Administrative Court, which partially modified the approved addition. The municipality brought the matter to the Federal Supreme Court to enforce the original municipal building regulations.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_230/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against the order of 5 February 2026 of the president of the appeals instance of the Criminal Court of the Canton of Ticino. The matter concerned a dismissal decision.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1319/2024: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
In criminal proceedings, the appellant was declared incapable of guilt for various offenses (attempted simple bodily injury, simple bodily injury, etc.). A stationary therapeutic measure (Art. 59 StGB) was ordered. He claimed civil damages for suffered harm (including non-pecuniary damage and economic losses), which were partially rejected by the lower court. The Federal Supreme Court examined the admissibility of the appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_649/2024: Inadmissibility of the Request for Revision
Summary of the Facts
A.A.________ was convicted by the Tribunal correctionnel of the Est vaudois district, and this conviction was confirmed by the Cour d'appel pénale of the Canton of Vaud. In a separate proceeding, he requested revision of the judgment of 11 May 2020 based on newly discovered facts and evidence. The Cour d'appel declared the revision requests inadmissible, after which A.A.________ challenged the decision before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_388/2025: Judgment on Abusive Termination and Claim under a Bonus Plan
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ was employed by respondent B.________ AG from 2017 to 2021, lastly as COO. In 2018, a bonus plan as additional compensation was concluded between the parties. After termination by the employer in June 2021, A.________ claimed payment under the bonus plan (especially the "Exit Multiple") and damages for an allegedly abusive dismissal. The lower courts dismissed these claims.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1064/2023: Qualified Violation of the Narcotics Act, Sentencing, Arbitrary Decision, and Right to be Heard
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was charged with qualified violations of the Narcotics Act (BetmG). Between 2018 and 2019, he allegedly sold significant quantities of cocaine to various persons and stored cocaine for resale. He was convicted in both lower courts. The Regional Court Bern-Mittelland sentenced A.________ to a partially conditional prison sentence of 35 months. The Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern confirmed the convictions and increased the sentence to an unconditional prison term of 3 years and 4 months.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_409/2025: Attribution of Loan Repayments within Social Assistance
Summary of the Facts
The respondent (A.________) applied for social assistance benefits granted by the Social Services of St. Gallen, with various income offsets, including a monthly loan repayment of CHF 50. After objection and subsequent appeal, the original assessment was partially corrected. The Administrative Court of the Canton of St. Gallen ruled that the monthly loan repayment should be considered as assets, not income, and accordingly increased the support amount. The appellant (Political Municipality of St. Gallen) appealed this decision.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_13/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
A.________ claimed damages of CHF 1,500 from B.________ AG. Both the Pretore of the Lugano District (judgment of 9 October 2025) and the Camera civile dei reclami of the Tribunal d'appello of the Canton of Ticino (decision of 8 January 2026) dismissed the claim. A.________ then filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7F_2/2026: Judgment on the Requests for Revision
Summary of the Facts
The petitioner filed revision requests against the Federal Supreme Court judgments 7B_374/2025, 7B_832/2025, and 7B_1121/2025. The requests were submitted on the grounds that the judgments were insufficiently reasoned or based on incorrect findings of fact, and she requested annulment of these judgments.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_567/2025: Decision on Intercantonal Double Taxation and Unlimited Tax Domicile
Summary of the Facts
A.A.________ and B.A.________ have been married since 2010 and have a common daughter. Between 2017 and 2018, their tax domicile was assessed differently due to changes of residence and professional and family ties in the cantons of Ticino and Graubünden. The competent tax authorities of the Canton of Ticino imposed taxes for the tax periods 2017 and 2018, which A.A.________ contested. Decisions were made at the cantonal level, leading to an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court. Disputes concerned the question of unlimited tax domicile and intercantonal double taxation.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_92/2026: Access to Documents of B.________ SA
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ requested in 2020, based on the cantonal law on information and transparency (LIT), access to certain documents of B.________ SA, especially information on cultural events, energy contracts, and renewable energy sources. B.________ SA partially refused access citing trade secrets. The cantonal Commission for Data Protection and Transparency granted partial access, which was overturned by the Administrative Court of the Canton of Ticino. A.________ then lodged appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_160/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Due to Insufficient Reasoning
Summary of the Facts
The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich awarded the appellant A.________ an invalidity pension of 37.5% of a full pension from 1 April 2022 by judgment of 17 December 2025. The appellant filed an appeal against this decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_204/2026: Non-Admissibility of the Appeal Against the Termination of Accident Insurance Benefits
Summary of the Facts
The appellant contested the decision of AXA Versicherungen AG to terminate accident insurance benefits as of 1 October 2022. After an accident in 2022, no further incapacity to work was medically confirmed, and treatments were limited to physiotherapy and analgesics. The Insurance Court of the Canton of Aargau confirmed the termination of benefits by the respondent.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_518/2025: Judgment on Reapplication to Disability Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, born in 1982, after multiple denials of her pension claims, lastly applied on 18 October 2023 for reapplication to the Disability Insurance of Lucerne. She cited depression and anxiety disorder as health impairments. After a preliminary decision and medical evaluation, the IV office of Lucerne rejected the reapplication due to lack of credibly demonstrated changes in health status. The Cantonal Court of Lucerne confirmed this decision.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_232/2026: Non-Admissibility of an Appeal Concerning Precautionary Measures on Expert Reports
Summary of the Facts
The appellant requested precautionary measures regarding two expert reports which, in his view, were unusable and scientifically non-assessable. The Regional Court Bern-Mittelland and the Cantonal Supreme Court of Bern rejected his request. The appellant then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting annulment of the cantonal decision and remand of the matter to the Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_552/2025: Dismissal of Building Permit for Construction Measures
Summary of the Facts
B.________, owner of a parcel in Prilly (Canton of Vaud), applied for a building permit for renovation, remodeling, and extension of an existing building and the construction of a new residential building with underground parking. The plan involved the felling of 28 trees on the property, which was challenged by A.________, a tenant of a neighboring parcel. The municipality of Prilly granted the building permit, and the Cantonal Court of Vaud confirmed this decision. A.________ appealed the decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_210/2025: Dismissal of the Appeal and Granting of Legal Aid
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.A.________ was acquitted by the District Court of Eastern Vaud on 25 March 2024 of charges of sexual acts with minors and acts on persons incapable of judgment or resistance. On appeal, the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court amended the judgment completely on 23 September 2024, convicted A.A.________, and imposed a conditional prison sentence of 18 months with a probation period of 5 years, as well as damages of CHF 6,000 to the victim. A.A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_101/2026: Non-Admissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The lower court, the Social Insurance Chamber of the Cantonal Court of Geneva, ordered on 23 December 2025 a multidisciplinary medical examination in a dispute between the Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA), military insurance division, and A.________. SUVA appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting annulment of the ordered expertise and recognition of the unrestricted evidential value of an administrative expert report by Unisanté. Alternatively, it requested supplementation of the questions to the experts.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_177/2025: Tax Rate on Sale of Co-Ownership of Real Estate
Summary of the Facts
The dispute concerned whether the gain of CHF 332,744 realized by the taxpayer (A.________) in 2020 from the sale of her half of co-ownership of a property ("Property 2") was subject to a 0% or 10% tax rate under a so-called "remploy". The tax administration of the Canton of Geneva denied the remploy and set the tax at 40% assuming a shorter holding period. The taxpayer argued that the holding period of the previously sold property ("Property 1") must be cumulated with that of Property 2, resulting in a 0% tax rate.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_712/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
Attorney A.________ was sanctioned by the Disciplinary Commission of Lawyers of the Canton of Ticino on 8 August 2025 with a disciplinary fine of CHF 1,500 according to Art. 12 BGFA. He appealed, but the Administrative Court of the Canton of Ticino declared the appeal inadmissible on 12 November 2025 because the appeal was filed late.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_679/2025: Usability of Residual Work Capacity within Disability Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, born 1970, applied to the IV office of the Canton of Aargau in 2015 and again in 2018 for disability insurance benefits due to health impairments. After extensive medical assessments, the IV office granted him a half disability pension (1 December 2018 to 31 December 2023) and from 1 January 2024 a disability pension of 64%. The Insurance Court of the Canton of Aargau partially annulled this decision and amended it confirming a pension entitlement of 60%. The appellant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting assignment of a full disability pension.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1005/2025: Judgment on Unsealing and Search of Electronic Data Carriers
Summary of the Facts
The appeal is directed against the order of the Coercive Measures Court of the Canton of Lucerne dated 28 August 2025, which ordered unsealing and searching of electronic data carriers and physical documents seized during a house search. The appellant claims the data carriers contain information subject to attorney-client privilege.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_232/2025: Judgment on Interpretation of a Managing Director Contract Concerning Pension Claims
Summary of the Facts
A.________ AG (appellant) and B.________ AG (respondent) dispute the obligation to secure the value of a pension of a former managing director, originally guaranteed by the predecessor in law of the respondent. The managing director contract between a subsidiary of A.________ AG and the former managing director contained a crediting of previous pension claims, with the valorization being disputed. The first instance (Commercial Court Zurich) dismissed the appellant's claim.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_19/2026: Usability of Illegally Obtained Evidence
Summary of the Facts
The decision concerns two appeals by A.________ and B.________ against the use of a video as evidence, which was recorded by third parties without their consent. The video was used in an investigation by the cantonal public prosecutor’s office of Vaud, which investigated the appellants for alleged animal mistreatment. The lower courts had so far confirmed the admissibility of the evidence, although the appellants argued it was obtained illegally.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_696/2025: Dismissal of the Appeal Against the Judgment Due to Fraud and Social Welfare Offenses
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, a Swiss national, was convicted in first instance by a criminal court in the district of Lausanne for multiple fraud offenses, attempted fraud, unlawful receipt of social welfare benefits, and forgery to a 12-month prison sentence, conditionally suspended for three years, and a fine. She unsuccessfully appealed to the Cantonal Court of Vaud, which slightly reduced the prison sentence but retained 12 months in the ruling. She had also forwarded videos with violent content via WhatsApp. Essentially, the lower court accused the appellant of concealing income over a long period, unlawfully asserting financial claims, and producing or passing on forged documents.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_72/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
An applicant requested legal aid for a planned liability claim against a hospital, alleging significant damages due to alleged treatment errors. The lower court dismissed the request, as the claim had no prospect of success. The applicant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_133/2026: Decision on Provisional Legal Opening
Summary of the Facts
A.________ AG (appellant) contested a circular decision of the Cantonal Supreme Court of Thurgau of 23 December 2025, which dismissed its appeal against a legal opening decision of the District Court Arbon of 21 November 2025 insofar as it admitted it. The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 16 March 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5D_44/2025: Judgment on Subsidiary Constitutional Complaint Regarding Property Freedom Claim
Summary of the Facts
The appellants are co-owners of a property crossed by a public path, which neighbors, the respondents, access partly via a private garden gate. The appellants filed a property freedom claim before lower courts to restrict the respondents' use of the path and to compel restoration of damaged braces. The lower courts dismissed the claim and the appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_259/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, lodged an appeal against a non-inquiry decision of the Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office of Central Valais. The Cantonal Court of Valais dismissed the appeal as inadmissible on 27 January 2026 and denied extension of the deadline for security deposit and legal aid. The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 7 February 2026, requesting legal aid again.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_747/2025: Judgment on Appeal by the Zurich Chief Public Prosecutor Regarding Negligent Homicide at a Construction Site
Summary of the Facts
On 5 December 2019, a fatal accident occurred at a construction site in V.________ when four freestanding concrete wall elements toppled, burying a person underneath. The Zurich-Limmat Public Prosecutor’s Office accused the respondent A.________ of causing the accident by negligent safety measures. The District Court Dietikon convicted A.________ of negligent homicide; however, the Cantonal Supreme Court of Zurich acquitted him.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_178/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Against the Administrative Court
Summary of the Facts
An appellant filed an appeal against a non-admission decision of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zug, which dismissed the appeal against the government council decision due to lack of sufficient reasoning. The proceedings relate to the termination of economic social assistance by the municipal council of Steinhausen and the unaddressed issue of reimbursement claims for family allowances.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_144/2026: Non-Inquiry and Non-Admissibility
Summary of the Facts
The appellant challenged the non-inquiry decision of the Public Prosecutor’s Office II of the Canton of Zurich dated 30 June 2025. The Cantonal Supreme Court of Zurich, III Criminal Chamber, dismissed the appeal against this decision on 29 December 2025. The appellant then lodged a criminal appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 4 February 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_66/2026: Decision on an Appeal Regarding the Complete Effects of a Complete Exclusion of Effect in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
A real estate company (A.________ SA) was confronted with complaint proceedings by creditors due to its financial situation and ongoing debt enforcement, concerning the management of its property. The lower court rejected the company’s appeal against an order of the Debt Collection Office Geneva, which transferred property management to another company. A simultaneous request for suspensive effect of the appeal was also rejected.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_240/2026: Judgment on the Inadmissibility and Granting of Appeal and Revision Request
Summary of the Facts
A.________, father of a child born in 2022, got into numerous legal conflicts after separation from his ex-partner B.________, involving allegations of threats and harassment. After an incident in May 2025, where he allegedly snatched and destroyed her phone, an investigation for threats and violence against authorities was initiated. At various times, investigative custody and later substitute measures were ordered, including contact bans and psychiatric orders. A.________ filed complaints against the orders of the Neuchâtel Tribunal for Coercive Measures (TMC) and their confirmation by the cantonal appellate authority.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_60/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a request to change the curator appointed for his two children (Art. 308 paras. 1 and 2 ZGB), which was rejected by the Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) of Montagnes and Val-de-Ruz on 10 September 2025. The lower court, the cantonal court of Neuchâtel (Cour des mesures de protection de l'enfant et de l'adulte), dismissed the appeal against this decision on 4 December 2025. The appellant finally appealed in civil matters to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_147/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed an appeal on 25 February 2026 against a decision of the Chambre des assurances sociales of the Cour de justice of the Canton of Geneva dated 23 January 2026. In the contested decision of 12 September 2025, the Office of Disability Insurance of the Canton of Geneva decided not to consider a new application for benefits by A.________ because no significant deterioration of his health condition since the last relevant decision on 11 April 2022 was credibly demonstrated.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_163/2026: Judgment Regarding Disciplinary Proceedings in Lawyer’s Law and Advance Payment Obligation
Summary of the Facts
Attorney A.________ was fined by the Lawyers’ Supervisory Commission of the Canton of Appenzell Ausserrhoden for violation of professional rules. He appealed to the Cantonal Supreme Court but did not pay the required advance payment despite an extension. The Supreme Court therefore did not take the appeal. A.________ then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting annulment of the decision and remand of the matter to the lower court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_123/2026: Non-Admissibility Decision Regarding an Appeal Against Bankruptcy Opening
Summary of the Facts
The District Court Hinwil opened bankruptcy over the appellant (A.________ GmbH in liquidation) on 5 January 2025. The appellant filed an appeal against this decision with the Cantonal Supreme Court of Zurich on 6 January 2026, which was dismissed on 26 January 2026. Subsequently, the appellant lodged an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 5 February 2026. As the appellant failed to pay the advance despite a grace period, the Federal Supreme Court did not entertain the appeal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_166/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Against Interim Orders on an Advance Payment
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) challenges an interim order of the Federal Administrative Court dated 9 February 2026 requiring him to pay an advance of CHF 1,000 under threat of dismissal for non-payment. The appellant claims he cannot pay the advance as a recipient of supplementary benefits and requests legal aid accordingly.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1297/2024: Partial Grant of Appeal Due to Abuse of Office and Violation of Official Secrecy
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a police officer in the Canton of Vaud, was initially acquitted by the District Court Lausanne on 6 April 2023 of allegations of abuse of office and violation of official secrecy. On appeal by the Vaud Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Appeals Chamber of the Cantonal Court convicted A.________ on 5 October 2023 and fined him. A.________ is accused of unlawfully disclosing information from a police database within a private conflict to a third party.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_172/2026: Recusal Request in Criminal Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
A.________, appellant, was the subject of a criminal investigation by the Rheinfelden-Laufenburg Public Prosecutor’s Office for various offenses including gang-related theft, extortion, and arson. After a recusal request was denied in 2024, the appellant filed a new recusal request on 13 November 2025 against the lead prosecutor Lea Jetzer at the Rheinfelden District Court. This was dismissed by the cantonal appeals chamber of the Cantonal Supreme Court of Aargau. The appellant appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_28/2025: Decision on Unsealing a Mobile Phone
Summary of the Facts
A.________ is held in the Pöschwies penitentiary and is a non-accused person in a criminal investigation for bribery (Art. 322quater StGB) against unknown perpetrators. His mobile phone was seized in May 2024, sealed with a valid sealing order, and later subject to an unsealing request by the Public Prosecutor’s Office II of the Canton of Zurich. The Coercive Measures Court did not grant the unsealing request but allowed the phone to be searched. A.________ filed an appeal requesting the return of his mobile phone.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7G_1/2026: Judgment on Correction of a Previous Federal Supreme Court Decision
Summary of the Facts
The petitioner requested correction of an earlier Federal Supreme Court judgment (7B_1356/2025 of 26 January 2026) because it incorrectly listed the District Court Dietikon instead of the actually competent District Court Dielsdorf.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_131/2026: Non-Admissibility
Summary of the Facts
B.________ AG filed a criminal complaint against A.________ for embezzlement, unlawful appropriation, and misappropriation. The Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Canton of Schwyz discontinued proceedings against A.________. Upon appeal by B.________ AG, the Cantonal Court of Schwyz annulled the discontinuation decision and remanded the case to the Public Prosecutor’s Office for further investigation. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, requesting, among other things, discontinuation of the criminal proceedings or confirmation of the discontinuation order.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_219/2026: Non-Admissibility of an Appeal Related to Criminal Proceedings
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court against a judgment of the Cantonal Court of Lucerne, which was not yet available at the time of appeal filing. The appellant also requested legal aid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_492/2024: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
A.________, former director of a cooperative, faced accusations by B.________ and C.________, also members of the cooperative. These allegations were based on statements by E.________ and F.________, employees of the cooperative. Later statements by F.________ raised doubts about the original account, alleging the statements were influenced by B.________ and C.________. Subsequently, A.________ sued B.________ and C.________ for incitement to false testimony, defamation, and breach of fiduciary duty. The criminal proceedings were partly discontinued.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_230/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
A.________ Sàrl was declared bankrupt by the first-instance court in Geneva on 29 January 2026. Its appeal proceedings before the Civil Chamber of the Court of Appeal of the Canton of Geneva were dismissed on 18 February 2026, after which it filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on 12 March 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_222/2026: Non-Admissibility of an Appeal Against a Garnishment Notice
Summary of the Facts
The appellant lodged an appeal against a garnishment notice dated 19 January 2026. The supervisory authority for debt collection and bankruptcy of the Canton of Solothurn did not entertain the appeal by judgment of 19 February 2026. The appellant then filed an appeal in civil matters with the Federal Supreme Court on 11 March 2026. Further submissions and attachments were made on 17 and 26 March 2026.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_111/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) filed two criminal complaints against a former patient for alleged defamation offenses. The Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Canton of Geneva then issued two non-inquiry orders confirmed by the Appeals Chamber of the Cantonal Court of Geneva on 22 December 2025. A.________ appealed in criminal matters to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_268/2026: Preventive Detention
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ was sentenced by the cantonal criminal court for various offenses to a prison sentence of 5 years and 6 months and a seven-year expulsion. He has been in pre-trial or preventive detention since 26 June 2023. After rejection of several appeals and other legal remedies, he again requested release on 4 February 2026, which was denied by the president of the cantonal appeals and complaints instance on 16 February 2026. He appealed to the Federal Supreme Court requesting annulment of the decision and his release.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_405/2025: Violation of Personality Rights Through Press Reporting
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, in a lawsuit against Ringier AG, challenged two press reports in "Sonntagsblick" and the online portal "Blick" dated 23 January 2022 as unlawful violations of personality rights. These articles concerned his involvement in a sensational economic criminal trial (B.________ trial). He requested a declaration of violation of his personality, deletion of personal data from the articles, and damages of CHF 5,000. The District Court Zofingen and the Cantonal Supreme Court of Aargau dismissed the lawsuit.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7F_58/2025: Inadmissibility of the Request for Revision
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed a request for revision on 11 December 2025, supplemented on 18 December 2025, against the Federal Supreme Court judgment of 13 October 2025 (7B_577/2025). This judgment dismissed an appeal by the appellant and a company against a decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Cantonal Court of Valais dated 2 June 2025.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_235/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant challenged a decision of the President of the Civil Court of the Greyerz District dated 12 August 2025 granting definitive legal opening for a claim of CHF 500 by the Confederation. The II Civil Appeals Chamber of the Cantonal Court of Fribourg declared the appellant's cantonal appeal obviously inadmissible on 20 October 2025. The appellant then filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2D_5/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
This proceeding concerns a dispute in public procurement. The municipal council of X.________ awarded a construction project concerning the demolition and reconstruction of three bridges to the consortium G.________. Two unsuccessful consortia (D.________ and A.________) applied to the Administrative Court of the Canton of Ticino to annul the award decision. The Administrative Court partially granted D.________'s request and excluded A.________ from the proceedings, remanding the matter to the awarding authority for a new decision. The consortium A.________ then filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_245/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ had objected against the provisional legal opening regarding a claim of CHF 323.75 plus incidental costs, which was issued by the Justice of the Peace of the Lausanne District. The Court of Debt Collection and Bankruptcy of the Cantonal Court of Vaud dismissed the debtor's cantonal appeal against the decision. The appellant then filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_22/2026: Denial of Legal Aid
Summary of the Facts
In this case, the appellant A.________ requested legal aid in connection with a lawsuit against two companies regarding compensation claims totaling 750 euros (flight cancellation), 514 euros (accommodation and meals), and 600 CHF (non-pecuniary damages). The lower courts in Geneva dismissed the requests on the grounds that the requested measures were disproportionate to the amount in dispute, some claims had insufficient chances of success, and a reasonable plaintiff in this situation would not incur attorney costs. The appellant filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint with the Federal Supreme Court, which declared it inadmissible.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_138/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Regarding Corporate Liability under Art. 52 AHVG
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed an appeal against the judgment of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zug, which affirmed liability for damages under Art. 52 AHVG. This is based on unpaid social insurance contributions of a GmbH where the appellant acted as managing director. He requested annulment of the judgment and denial of the liability.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_557/2025: Dismissal of the Appeal Against the Decision of the Disability Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (born 1977) worked until 2019 and applied twice for pensions at the Disability Insurance (IV) due to psychological and somatic complaints. After psychological and multidisciplinary assessments and further medical examinations, the IV rejected the pension application because her work capacity for adapted employment was assessed as full. The cantonal court confirmed this decision, leading the appellant to appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_105/2026: Non-Disclosure of a Debt Enforcement to Third Parties
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________ GmbH) requested the Debt Enforcement Office Schaffhausen not to disclose the debt enforcement proceedings against her to third parties. This request was denied by the Debt Enforcement Office. The Cantonal Supreme Court of Schaffhausen confirmed dismissal of the appeal against the Debt Enforcement Office’s order. The Federal Supreme Court reviewed whether the lower court violated federal law.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8F_19/2025: Judgment Regarding a Request for Revision Concerning Unemployment Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The petitioner, A.________, requested revision of a Federal Supreme Court judgment (8C_479/2025) due to alleged legal errors and newly emerged facts. The original judgment concerned a non-admission decision regarding unemployment insurance (procedural requirement). The petitioner also requested reinstatement of the appeal deadline.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_25/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of the Facts
The appellant was convicted by the Cantonal Supreme Court of Schaffhausen for an offense against the Explosives Act and prohibited face covering to a conditional fine and a penalty. He appealed to the Federal Supreme Court without an explicit request, presumably seeking acquittal.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_764/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Due to Speeding Violations
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was convicted of repeated speeding violations, including an especially severe excess of 75 km/h in urban areas. The lower court increased the penalty originally imposed by the Police Court of the Canton of Geneva and found him guilty of violating fundamental traffic rules under Art. 90 paras. 3 and 4 lit. b SVG. A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_128/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed a submission with the Administrative Court of the Canton of Graubünden on 16 December 2025, requesting revision of a judgment of 28 September 2021. The Administrative Court did not entertain this revision request because no sufficient engagement with the non-admission grounds was demonstrated.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.