Latest Judgments of the Federal Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Court (BGer) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositions. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts. The full summaries of all judgments are available on the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments tailored to your legal fields.
5A_384/2025: Decision regarding the complaint about an ordered curatorship
Summary of the Facts
A.A.________ opposed the ordered provisional curatorship for representation and management. Initially, she filed a complaint with the competent cantonal court, which was declared inadmissible due to lack of clarity and formal deficiencies. She appealed this decision to the Federal Court, particularly against the order of the curatorship and the permission to sell two apartments.
Summary of the Considerations
- **E.1**: The Federal Court notes that the content of A.A.________'s complaint was unclear, incoherent, and difficult to understand. The cantonal court correctly recognized that challenging a previous decision regarding the curatorship was not the subject of the contested decision. - **E.4.1**: The contested decision regarding the curatorship was correctly classified as inadmissible, as its basis had already been regulated by previous judicial decisions. - **E.4.2**: The Federal Court finds that A.A.________'s complaint does not contain sufficient and clear legal grounds to challenge the decision of the cantonal court. It further states that the complaint merely materially attacks the sale proceeds of the apartments, which was not a central component of the previous instance's decision.
Summary of the Disposition
The complaint was declared inadmissible, A.A.________ must pay court costs, and the decision will be communicated in writing.
9C_132/2022: Obligation to refund for uneconomical treatment in health insurance: Referral to the arbitration court
Summary of the Facts
Dr. med. A.________, a specialist in general internal medicine, was sued by the industry association Santésuisse and various health insurers for allegedly uneconomical treatment. The arbitration court of the Canton of Bern ordered him to refund fees for the year 2017 (CHF 146,894.75) and 2018 (CHF 139,417.20). Dr. med. A.________ and the health insurers each appealed this judgment to the Federal Court.
Summary of the Considerations
(E.1) The proceedings 9C_132/2022 and 9C_134/2022 are combined. (E.2) Claims in mergers or changes of health insurers pass to legal successors; corresponding adjustments were made in the heading. (E.3) The Federal Court only reviews the factual findings of the lower court in case of obvious incorrectness or legal violation; legal norms are applied ex officio. (E.4) Disputed is the application of Art. 59 para. 1 lit. b KVG regarding refunds for uneconomical treatment. (E.5) The assessment of economic efficiency is based on legal requirements for effectiveness, appropriateness, and economy (Art. 32 and Art. 56 KVG). The screening method is applied as the first step of the economic efficiency assessment, followed by an individual case assessment to consider practical specifics. (E.6) The methodology of the lower instance did not meet the updated federal court requirements for economic efficiency assessment, particularly regarding the consideration of practical specifics and tolerance margins. (E.7) Dr. med. A.________ criticizes the composition of the comparison collective and the determination of the tolerance margin in the screening process. His practical specifics (e.g., treatment of pain patients) were inadequately considered by the lower court. (E.8) The health insurers complain about an insufficient refund request and criticize the calculation formulas for the index values. The Federal Court establishes new guidelines for the refund calculation. (E.9) The judgment is overturned; the lower instance must conduct a complete economic efficiency assessment and decide taking into account the updated federal court jurisprudence.
Summary of the Disposition
The proceedings are combined, Dr. med. A.________'s complaint is partially upheld, and the lower instance is instructed to make a new decision.
7B_132/2025: Judgment on the standing of a complainant regarding a criminal complaint
Summary of the Facts
A.________ (complainant) filed criminal complaints against his brothers-in-law B.________ and C.________ for threats, assaults, and breach of the peace. The Zurich public prosecutor's office did not accept the proceedings, as the criminal complaints were not submitted in a timely or proper manner. The complainant's appeals against these decisions were rejected by the Zurich High Court. The complainant challenged the decisions before the Federal Court, requesting their annulment and the initiation of criminal investigations, as well as free legal aid.
Summary of the Considerations
E.1: The proceedings 7B_132/2025 and 7B_133/2025 are combined due to the close factual connection (Art. 71 BGG in conjunction with Art. 24 para. 2 lit. b BZP). E.2: The complaint does not meet the justification requirements according to Art. 42 para. 2 BGG. The complainant presents appellate criticism that does not adequately address the considerations of the High Court. The private prosecution is only authorized to appeal in criminal matters if the assessment of their civil claims is affected (Art. 81 para. 1 lit. b No. 5 BGG) or in cases of violations related to the right to file a criminal complaint (Art. 81 para. 1 lit. b No. 6 BGG). The complainant does not fulfill any of the requirements. E.3: The lower court evaluated the alleged intent to file a criminal complaint from the complainant's statement and an unsecured email as insufficient. It found that the submitted criminal complaints were late and not properly formatted. These considerations of the High Court were not substantively refuted in the federal court proceedings. E.4: Due to a lack of prospects of success, the requests for free legal aid are dismissed. The court costs are imposed on the complainant taking into account his financial circumstances.
Summary of the Disposition
The complaints are not processed, and the requests for free legal aid are dismissed.
1F_10/2025: Decision on the request for revision regarding a forest boundary plan
Summary of the Facts
The applicant A.________ requested the revision of the Federal Court judgment from February 10, 2025 (1C_228/2024) regarding a cantonal forest boundary plan. The original judgment dismissed the applicant's complaint against the decision of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Aargau, to the extent that it was entertained. In the revision request, A.________ invoked the reason of Art. 121 lit. d BGG and requested a legal-compliant reassessment of her case.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_450/2025: Complaint against the decision of inadmissibility regarding custody and visitation rights
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ and the respondent B.________ are the parents of their daughter C.________. The District Court of Rorschach entrusted the mother with sole custody, gradually defined the father's visitation rights in phases, and established a guardianship according to Art. 308 para. 2 ZGB. The Cantonal Court of St. Gallen did not entertain the appeal filed by the father, as he had not paid the cost advance. The complainant then turned to the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_194/2025: Non-acceptance of a public law complaint
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was imposed costs of CHF 2,821.15 by the construction administration of the municipality of Oberbüren for the removal and disposal of diesel-contaminated materials, as well as for the restoration of the soil and garden slabs. The contamination was discovered during an inspection. A.________ contested the obligation to pay the costs, but his legal remedies were rejected by the municipal council, the building and environmental department of the Canton of St. Gallen, and eventually by the Administrative Court of the Canton of St. Gallen.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_61/2025: Decision on precautionary measures regarding child support and care
Summary of the Facts
A.________ and B.________ are unmarried parents and live separately. Their joint children C.________ and D.________ (born in 2019 and 2020) are under their joint parental care. After the separation, a dispute arose over custody, visitation rights, and care shares, as well as child support. The District Court of March provisionally regulated these points on November 24, 2023 (alternating custody and maintenance payments from the father to the mother). Both parties appealed this decision. The Cantonal Court of Schwyz decided on December 17, 2024, and set the father's maintenance contributions in six phases. A.________ filed a civil complaint with the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
6B_504/2024: Judgment regarding gross traffic rule violation
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was accused of exceeding the permissible speed limit of 50 km/h by 26 km/h within the city limits on May 6, 2020, which constitutes a gross violation of traffic rules according to Art. 90 para. 2 SVG. The District Court of Wil sentenced him on August 17, 2021, to a conditional fine and a fine. This judgment was confirmed in a slightly modified form by the Cantonal Court of St. Gallen on February 28, 2024. A.________ requested the Federal Court to overturn the conviction and acquit him.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5F_34/2025: Revision of a federal court judgment regarding condominium ownership
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ AG, a condominium owner of commercial/service premises, requested their conversion into residential spaces. After its application was rejected by other condominium owners, it submitted various requests, including precautionary measures and a request for withdrawal. Both the cantonal authorities and the Federal Court did not entertain the requests due to insufficient justification. The A.________ AG now demands a revision of the judgment 5A_319/2025 and a referral for reassessment by an unbiased body.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_388/2025: Decision on the admissibility of an appeal due to lack of capacity to act based on a general representation authority
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ had filed a legal remedy with the Federal Court to challenge a decision of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Vaud. This court had declared his appeal against a decision by the peace judge inadmissible. The reason was a measure of general representation authority (Art. 398 ZGB), which deprives the complainant of capacity to act as long as it is not supported or ratified by his curator.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5D_25/2025: Decision on the admissibility of a legal remedy based on capacity to act
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ was subject to a measure of general guardianship since December 14, 2022, and was thus excluded from exercising civil capacity according to Art. 398 para. 3 ZGB. He submitted a complaint on May 12, 2025, against a decision of the Cantonal Court of Vaud from April 3, 2024. His guardian refused to approve the legal remedy on June 3, 2025, after which the Federal Court found the complaint obviously inadmissible.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1F_12/2025: Judgment regarding a request for revision of a contact ban
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Court addresses a request for revision from A.________ against its own judgment from November 1, 2024 (1C_596/2024), in which the court did not entertain the complaint from A.________. A.________ invokes new facts and evidence, which do not constitute grounds for revision according to Art. 121 ff. BGG, as they do not concern the question of admissibility but rather a material review.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_199/2025: Decision on the deletion of personal data in connection with individual initiatives
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Court deals with a complaint from A.________, who requested the deletion of his personal data from the Cantonal Council of Zurich. The complainant had submitted various individual initiatives since 2012, which were not sufficiently supported. His request for deletion was rejected by the management of the Cantonal Council as well as by the Administrative Court of Zurich. The Federal Court examines the legality of the previous decisions.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_456/2024: Decision regarding the dismantling of a bridge and standing to appeal
Summary of the Facts
The heirs' community B.C.________, owner of a property in Küssnacht am Rigi, was required to submit a subsequent building application for an existing bridge. After the application was withdrawn and a dismantling project was submitted, the District Council of Küssnacht ordered the dismantling based on cantonal regulations. A.________, a tenant of the property, contested the decision and filed several complaints, unsuccessfully attempting to gain access to the prior records and assert her rights. The case ultimately reached the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_198/2025: Judgment on supplementary benefits to AHV/IV
Summary of the Facts
A.________ applied for supplementary benefits to AHV/IV, which were refused by the compensation office of Glarus, as her assets exceeded the legal threshold of CHF 100,000 according to Art. 9a para. 1 lit. a ELG. Her objection and the complaint to the Administrative Court of the Canton of Glarus were unsuccessful. She therefore turned to the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_448/2025: Decision on the subsidiary constitutional complaint regarding the oral judgment reasoning
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________, father of two children, filed a subsidiary constitutional complaint against a decision of the Appeals Court of Basel-Stadt. This had rejected the complainant's request for a complete written version of an orally announced judgment reasoning. The complainant argued that the lack of a written version violated his right to be heard and his ability to appeal.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_167/2025: Decision on the calculation of the appeal deadline in insurance law
Summary of the Facts
A.________, insured with Groupe Mutuel Assurances GMA SA, requested the coverage of costs for a medical intervention carried out in Finland. This was rejected by the insurance on September 4, 2024, and after an appeal on December 23, 2024. The subsequent appeal filed with the cantonal court was declared inadmissible on February 14, 2025, due to missed deadlines. A.________ then filed a complaint with the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
6B_225/2025: Delivery fiction and compliance with deadlines in appeal proceedings according to the StPO
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ was sentenced by the Cantonal Court of Schaffhausen in absentia to a fine of CHF 210 for multiple traffic rule violations. His request for reconsideration was rejected. He filed a complaint against this decision, which the High Court of the Canton of Schaffhausen declared late and therefore did not entertain. Before the Federal Court, the complainant criticizes the application of the delivery fiction and the assessment of lateness by the lower court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_338/2025: Dispute over the challenge of paternity acknowledgment in connection with international jurisdiction
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ challenged the acknowledgment of paternity of his children C.________ and D.________. D.________ was established as his son by an Italian court ruling, while C.________ was acknowledged by him in Switzerland. The Cantonal Court declared the challenge of paternity regarding D.________ inadmissible, as the Italian ruling did not represent a voluntary acknowledgment.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_286/2025: Decision on the refusal of free legal aid
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed a lawsuit on June 17, 2024, to challenge paternity regarding C.________ and D.________ and simultaneously requested free legal aid. The responsible Pretore of the District of Lugano rejected both, citing the lack of prospects of success of the lawsuit (Art. 117 lit. b ZPO). The Cantonal Court confirmed the lower court's decision and also refused to grant free legal aid. A.________ brought the matter before the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5D_35/2024: Decisions of the Federal Court on enforcement and fines in inheritance matters
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ filed eight constitutional complaints against cantonal decisions that confirmed daily fines for failing to take actions related to an inheritance. The cantonal authorities imposed the fines according to Art. 343 para. 1 lit. c ZPO. The legal issues and the contested application of the law were primarily addressed in previous judgments of the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
9C_583/2024: Legally valid withdrawal from a Pillar 3a life insurance
Summary of the Facts
A.________ suffered a car accident in 2006 and claimed health issues that led him to seek benefits from his tied pension insurance (Pillar 3a). The insurance coverage was questioned by Generali Personenversicherungen AG, which, after surveillance and a medical report, expressed suspicion that A.________ had intentionally misrepresented his health status. The insurance retroactively withdrew from the contract in 2015 as of the date of loss. A.________ unsuccessfully sued before the Administrative Court of Nidwalden, demanding, among other things, the payment of a disability pension.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5D_21/2024: Decision on the enforcement of measures in an inheritance
Summary of the Facts
The complainant was ordered by the justice of the peace of the district of Lausanne to pay fines for each day of non-compliance with an order according to Art. 343 para. 1 lit. c of the Civil Procedure Code (ZPO). The orders concerned measures to secure inheritance assets and to regulate the estate administration. Appeals by the complainant against these decisions were rejected by the cantonal civil court and later by the Federal Court. The legal issues primarily concerned the enforceability of the orders and the role of the administrator of the estate.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
6B_994/2024: Judgment regarding violation of official secrecy through the dissemination of police information
Summary of the Facts
The complainant, a police officer of the city police, was secondarily convicted by the High Court of the Canton of Zurich for multiple violations of official secrecy to a conditional fine. The background is the dissemination of police internal information to employees of the city administration who were not part of the limited circle of police knowledge holders. The complainant requested the Federal Court to overturn the judgment and acquit him.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_675/2023: Judgment on the building permit for a multi-family house in the water protection area A
Summary of the Facts
The B.________ GmbH, owner of an undeveloped plot of land in Bad Ragaz, received a building permit from the municipality for the construction of a multi-family house with an underground garage and air-water heat pump. Neighbor A.________ and other affected persons filed an objection, as the building project is planned in the particularly endangered water protection area A. The objection was rejected by the municipal council, the construction and environmental department of the Canton of St. Gallen, and ultimately by the Administrative Court of the Canton of St. Gallen. A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Court, demanding the annulment of the building permit due to the absence of a water protection permit from the canton.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_385/2025: Decision on the admissibility of a complaint regarding the construction worker lien
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ GmbH requested the registration of a construction worker lien on a property for a lien amount of CHF 660,064.95. The Commercial Court of the Canton of Aargau confirmed the provisional registration only for a reduced amount of CHF 160,880.-- and set a deadline for a definitive registration. The complainant filed a late complaint with the Federal Court, which was therefore not processed.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_657/2024: Decision on the building application and the rejection of a change in the use of a property
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ SA is the owner of a plot in Renens on which a building stands, the purpose of which was established in a partial use plan ('PPA P 32') from 1989. Without permission, it set up apartments and rented them out. Later, it applied for the retroactive approval of these apartments as well as for further changes. The municipality refused to process the new building applications, as a binding decision on restoring the original condition was in force.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_404/2025: Visitation rights and free legal aid in the context of a marriage protection procedure
Summary of the Facts
A marriage protection procedure concerns the arrangement of visitation rights for the daughter born in 2023 of the respondent and the complainant. In previous decisions, the visitation rights were gradually expanded, and custody of the child was awarded to the mother. The complainant requested a gradually expanded visitation right, unsupervised visits, overnight stays, and alternating custody, as well as free legal aid. The High Court of the Canton of Graubünden had already adjusted the visitation rights, but rejected further requests. The Federal Court reviewed the cantonal final decisions on the visitation arrangements and free legal aid.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_593/2024: Restitution of legally received supplementary benefits: Claim against the estate
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Court addresses the question of whether the claim of the Service des prestations complémentaires (SPC) of the Canton of Geneva for the reimbursement of legally received supplementary benefits against the estate of the deceased Mr. A.A.________ is permissible. The point of contention is particularly the question of the limitation period of the reimbursement claim according to Art. 16b LPC. The heirs have opposed the claim of CHF 38,820 and argued that the claim is time-barred.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_573/2024: Judgment on the obligation of the accident insurance in case of relapse
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a painter insured by Suva against the consequences of accidents, suffered a right-sided calcaneus fracture in 2019. The health and daily benefits were stopped at the end of 2020, and an integrity compensation was granted. In mid-2021, he reported a relapse with foot, pelvic, and lumbar spine complaints. Suva denied any obligation to provide benefits, as no causal link to the original accident was evident. It took the same position regarding foot complaints prior to the operation in May 2023, as no relevant deterioration was found. The lower instance confirmed this.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
9C_142/2025: Decision on the issue of disability pension in the context of a new application
Summary of the Facts
The insured A.________, previously employed as a cleaning assistant, applied for disability insurance benefits for the first time in 2012 due to post-traumatic complaints. After initially granting a full disability pension, it was revoked after a review in 2014. A new application in 2017 was rejected after comprehensive medical assessments. Following several judicial procedures and medical reports, including a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment by SAM in 2023, the cantonal court found no relevant incapacity for work that would justify a pension.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_427/2024: Withdrawal of driving license due to a repeat offense abroad
Summary of the Facts
A.________ exceeded the permissible speed limit in Germany by 58 km/h, which was classified as a serious offense against traffic regulations according to Swiss law. Due to a previous withdrawal of his driving license for an offense abroad, the Zurich Road Traffic Office again withdrew his license for ten months. A.________ disputed the duration of the withdrawal and requested the application of the more lenient regulation for first offenders according to Art. 16c para. 2 SVG. His appeals to the Security Directorate, the Administrative Court of Zurich, and the Federal Court were unsuccessful.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
6B_876/2024: Compensation claim after fraudulent bankruptcy and asset reduction
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was convicted by the Basel-Landschaft criminal court for fraudulent bankruptcy, creditor damage through asset reduction, multiple forgery, and failure to maintain accounts to a conditional prison sentence of 19 months and a compensation claim of CHF 350,000 (Art. 71 para. 1 StGB). The lower instance dismissed his appeal. Before the Federal Court, A.________ requests that the compensation claim be partially or fully overturned, as he believes it to be unfounded or already settled through repayments and payments.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5D_29/2025: Decision on maintenance contributions in the context of measures to protect the marital community
Summary of the Facts
The decision concerns a dispute between A.________ (father) and B.________ (mother) regarding maintenance contributions for three minor children in the context of measures to protect the marital community. The father had requested an adjustment of the maintenance contributions, which were initially granted to him in part. This judgment was later reversed in the cantonal instance, so the original judgment from February 1, 2023 remained in effect. The father ultimately filed a complaint with the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
9C_236/2025: Judgment on the refused free legal aid
Summary of the Facts
The complainant, A.________, requested free legal aid before the Federal Administrative Court in connection with a complaint against a decision of the Federal Office for Customs and Border Security. The request was rejected by the Federal Administrative Court, as A.________ did not provide sufficient evidence of her need. At the same time, she was required to pay a cost advance. She then filed a complaint with the Federal Court to challenge the refusal of free legal aid.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
7B_280/2025: Decision on the issue of standing to appeal in criminal matters
Summary of the Facts
A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Court against a decision of the criminal chamber of the Cantonal Court of Geneva (from February 28, 2025). The cantonal decision rejected a complaint against a dismissal decision by the Geneva public prosecutor's office from December 17, 2024.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_305/2025: Judgment on procedural prerequisites in the field of accident insurance
Summary of the Facts
The complainant opposed an objection decision by Vaudoise Allgemeine Versicherungs-Gesellschaft AG, which denied any further obligation of the accident insurance. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern confirmed this decision, arguing that the health damages no longer had a natural causal connection to the accident of October 17, 2024.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_552/2024: Decision on a definitive change of function in the public service in the Canton of Geneva
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ had been employed by the Canton of Geneva since 2004 and was appointed deputy director of a penal institution in 2017. After an interim directorship, he was transferred to another penal institution in January 2022. In December 2022, the responsible state council informed him of his definitive transfer to the deputy director of the new penal institution with a salary grade below his previous status. The cantonal administrative judiciary and the state council assessed the change as an organizationally necessary measure that did not constitute a sanction. The complainant filed a complaint with the Federal Court against this decision.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_133/2025: Request for deletion of data from the decision database
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.________ requested the deletion of all references to an earlier Federal Court judgment that contained indications of his health status from files and the publicly accessible database from the Zug Administrative Court. The Administrative Court rejected his request. The complainant then filed a complaint in public law matters with the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
7B_150/2025: Judgment on the admissibility of complaints against the dismissal of an indictment by a district court
Summary of the Facts
The district court had dismissed the indictment due to formal deficiencies and concluded the proceedings as completed. The High Court rejected the complaints of the complainants against this dismissal decision, as it was a procedural decision and not a decision concluding the proceedings, thus no irreparable disadvantage in the sense of the law was present.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_419/2024: Judgment regarding accident insurance
Summary of the Facts
A.________ suffered a car accident in 1988 with severe injuries to the left thigh and foot. Early revision requests led to a half disability pension (50%) starting in 1997. Based on a worsened health condition due to multiple relapses and surgeries, A.________ applied for an increase in this pension from October 2019. After initial rejection by the CNA and further medical assessments, a full disability pension was granted by the cantonal instance.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
4D_99/2025: Decision regarding late admissibility of legal remedy
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ SA filed a complaint against the decision of the Appeals Court of the Canton of Ticino from April 8, 2025, which confirmed the expulsion by B.________ SA. The A.________ SA argued that the condition of its President of the Board prevented a timely submission of the complaint due to hospitalization. An extension of the deadline was requested, along with a request for the suspension of the contested decision.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
6B_912/2024: Decision on expulsion and DNA profiling
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Court examined the complaint of A.________ against a judgment of the High Court of the Canton of Zurich, which confirmed an expulsion and the creation of a DNA profile. The complainant argued that he was seriously endangered in his home country Honduras due to his homosexuality, and the expulsion constituted a disproportionate interference with his rights. He also criticized the order for a DNA test and a DNA profile, as there was no risk of reoffending.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_216/2025: Decision on the termination of social assistance benefits
Summary of the Facts
A.________ had been socially supported by the Schüpfen social service since June 2011. Due to a referral to work in a clarification position (80% workload) and A.________'s subsequent refusal to take up the activity, the social service terminated financial assistance as of April 30, 2023. The partial approval of the complaint by the Seeland government office led to a retroactive payment of CHF 66.20 for May, June, and July 2023. Another complaint was rejected by the Administrative Court of Bern. The Federal Court particularly examines the legal aspects of the definitive termination of social assistance and its reasonableness, as well as the question of compensatory payments.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_94/2025: Access to documents and request for withdrawal before the Federal Court
Summary of the Facts
A.________ requested access to documents of an investigation by the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (EDÖB) regarding an application of Y.________ AG. This led to disputes between A.________ and Y.________ AG, which were heard before the Federal Administrative Court. A.________ filed a request for withdrawal against the presiding judge and the court clerk as well as a request for disclosure of the identity of Y.________ AG, which were rejected. A.________ then filed a complaint with the Federal Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_197/2025: Order regarding the withdrawal of a complaint in the field of accident insurance
Summary of the Facts
The complainant A.A.________ filed a complaint against the judgment of the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich from January 24, 2025, on April 1, 2025. In a letter dated May 23, 2025, the complainant withdrew his complaint.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5F_33/2025: Judgment regarding the revision of an earlier judgment
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ AG, a condominium owner in a residential development, sought to convert its commercial spaces into residential spaces, which was refused by other condominium owners, B.________ and C.________. After an unsuccessful request for precautionary measures and a negative decision by the Federal Court in the complaint procedure, the applicant requested a revision of the judgment.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
8C_208/2025: Decision on the withdrawal of a legal remedy regarding disability insurance
Summary of the Facts
A.________, represented by his lawyer, had filed a complaint with the Federal Court against a judgment of the Cantonal Court of the Canton of Vaud (Court of Social Insurance) from March 10, 2025. In his correspondence dated June 3, 2025, A.________ declared the withdrawal of the complaint.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
1C_619/2024: Judgment on the annulment of a facilitated naturalization
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a Turkish national, was facilitated naturalized on November 26, 2018. However, the marriage with his Swiss wife ended shortly after the naturalization due to separation and divorce. As a result, the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) initiated a procedure for the annulment of the naturalization and declared it null and void on March 30, 2023. A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Administrative Court, which rejected it. With a complaint in public law matters, he requested the annulment of the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.
5A_307/2025: Decision regarding the early enforcement of a judgment in a divorce case
Summary of the Facts
The parties, A.________ and B.________, had numerous legal disputes over maintenance contributions and the liquidation of their property regime after their divorce. The issue in the present case focused on the early enforcement of a judgment that excluded a maintenance payment. A.________ argued that she would suffer serious disadvantages due to this decision.
You can find the complete summary of the judgment in the Portal.