Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (FSC) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present detailed summaries with facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts in each case. The full summaries of all judgments are available on the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your areas of law.
7B_1238/2025: Dismissal of the Appeal on Waiver of Court Costs
Summary of Facts
On July 10, 2025, A.________ filed a criminal complaint against an unknown person for simple bodily injury. She claims to have been injured on June 20, 2025, during a dispute (fracture of the left lower leg bones). At the same time, she applied for waiver of court costs and the appointment of attorney Me Fabien Mingard as free legal counsel. The application for waiver of court costs was rejected by the prosecutor of the Lausanne district because the prospects of success of the complaint were considered low. This was confirmed on August 29, 2025. The cantonal appellate court, the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Vaud Cantonal Court, dismissed A.________'s appeal on October 7, 2025.
Summary of Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court found that it is competent and that the appeal is admissible under Art. 78 et seq. BGG. No formal inadmissibility was found. The requirements for waiver of court costs include: lack of financial means, sufficient prospects of success, and necessity of legal counsel. The appeals chamber argued that the facts are simple and no particular legal or factual difficulties exist. Therefore, a lawyer is not necessary. A.________'s complaints about language barriers and personal difficulties were taken into account, but it was found that participation duties in the matter did not require substantial legal knowledge or actions. Translation aids could suffice.
Summary of Dispositive
The appeal and the application for waiver of court costs were dismissed. Court costs were set at CHF 1,200 and imposed on the appellant.
9C_63/2025: Retroactive Granting of Child Pensions
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ had been entitled to a full disability pension since 1990. In November 2023, she applied at the cantonal social insurance office for a retroactive supplementary benefit in the form of granted child pensions from the birth of her three children. The office then granted her retroactively two child pensions for certain periods from November 2018. The appellant demanded retroactive payment from the birth of the children. The cantonal court essentially confirmed the decision of the office but extended the already granted retroactive benefit periods by one month (from November 2018).
Summary of Considerations
- E.1: The appeal procedure within the meaning of the Federal Supreme Court Act is open for review of legal violations. The Federal Supreme Court is bound by the factual findings of the lower court unless they are obviously incorrect or unlawful. - E.2: The dispute concerns the retroactive granting of child pensions. It is established that the appellant did not submit timely applications for these benefits. According to Art. 24 para. 1 ATSG, the absolute limitation period of five years applies, even in case of incorrect administrative behavior. - E.3: The court clarifies that the office did not violate the duty to inform under Art. 27 ATSG because the appellant was repeatedly reminded of her reporting obligation, which she nevertheless failed to fulfill. - E.4: Application of the regulation on interest on pension arrears is excluded because the decision to pay the child pensions was made shortly after the application (Art. 26 para. 2 ATSG). - E.5-E.6: The criticism raised by the appellant concerning the cost and compensation ruling of the lower court is deemed unfounded. The cost decision reflects the limited success in the proceedings before the lower court, as only a minimal adjustment in her favor was decided.
Summary of Dispositive
The appeal was dismissed, and the costs of the proceedings were imposed on the appellant. Retroactive effect beyond the already granted benefits was not granted.
8C_246/2025: Judgment on the Determination of the Degree of Disability in Accident Insurance
Summary of Facts
A.________, born in 1992, suffered an accident while snowboarding in February 2019 and was accident-insured through SWICA Versicherungen AG. Following medical investigations and temporary payment of insurance benefits, SWICA granted A.________ a disability pension for a disability degree of 31% as well as an integrity compensation. The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich amended the degree of disability to 32%, upon which SWICA filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court examines the legal admissibility of the present appeal and the contested degree of disability of 32%. A violation of federal law may be alleged. The Federal Supreme Court is not bound by the lower court's findings of fact but primarily reviews the raised complaints. The dispute concerned the method for determining the degree of disability, specifically the adjustment of the valid income according to nominal wage development. The lower court relied on a general table by the BFS on nominal wage development. The appellant argued that sector-specific and gender-specific values should be applied, which the Federal Supreme Court confirmed as correct. The Federal Supreme Court confirms the required sector-specific adjustment of the valid income and determines that the degree of disability applying correct values is 30%. The lower court’s degree of disability of 32% is recognized as contrary to federal law. The procedure for review under Art. 61 lit. d ATSG is remanded to the lower court. The request for suspensive effect becomes obsolete. The court costs are imposed on the respondent.
Summary of Dispositive
The appeal was granted and the lower court decision annulled. The matter was remanded to the lower court for further clarification.
8C_108/2026: Non-Admission of an Appeal Regarding Social Assistance
Summary of Facts
The lower court (Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern) did not admit an appeal filed by the appellant on January 9, 2026, because the 30-day appeal period had expired unused on January 8, 2026.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_129/2026: Decision on International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters
Summary of Facts
The Italian Ministry of Justice requested Switzerland on April 15, 2024, to extradite A.________ for the enforcement of a one-year prison sentence for fraud, aggravated identity theft, and handling stolen goods. After procedural acts in Switzerland, A.________ refused the simplified extradition. On November 28, 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (FOJ) approved the extradition, which was confirmed by the Appeals Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court (CRP) on February 19, 2026. A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court requesting annulment of the decisions and refusal of extradition.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_139/2026: Dismissal of a Continuation Request in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
Summary of Facts
The appellant had enforced a payment order against B.________ AG in liquidation. After an agreement and a filed continuation request, the debt enforcement office rejected it because the objection was not removed. The lower courts dismissed all appeals. The appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_491/2024: Judgment Regarding Violations of the Weapons Act
Summary of Facts
The appellants A.________ and B.________ were convicted regarding violations of the Weapons Act (Art. 33 para. 1 lit. a LArm) and possible errors in evidence assessment. A.________ possessed a shotgun without a permit, while B.________ had a spray containing a substance subject to the law. Both had participated in a meeting of a right-wing extremist group in Geneva. The lower court convicted both based on their guilt.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_1061/2025: Payment Order and the Beneficium Excussionis Realis
Summary of Facts
The bank B.________ initiated a debt enforcement against the appellant (A.________) in enforcement case no. xxx at the Basel-Landschaft enforcement office. The appellant filed a complaint against the payment order with the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Supervisory Authority Basel-Landschaft, which rejected the complaint. The appellant then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court. During the ongoing proceedings, the parties withdrew the enforcement due to a settlement, rendering the proceedings moot.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_191/2026: Regulation of Parental Custody and Personal Contact
Summary of Facts
The parents of the child born in 2016 are separated, and the child is under guardianship according to Art. 308 para. 1 and 2 ZGB. Due to several danger reports and a custodial placement of the mother, in 2025 the KESB Seeland transferred custody to the father and regulated the mother's visitation rights. The Bern Cantonal Court modified the visitation regulation (four hours per week partially accompanied, with prior breath alcohol test) but dismissed the mother's remaining appeal. She then turned to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_241/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of Facts
A.________ filed an appeal against a decision of the Chambre pénale de recours of the Cour de justice of the Canton of Geneva dated January 21, 2026, which had dismissed her appeal against a non-prosecution order of the cantonal prosecutor dated October 29, 2025. The appellant claimed to have been harmed by alleged criminal acts and demanded damages of CHF 15,000.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_393/2025: Simple Violation of Traffic Rules and Principle of Indictment
Summary of Facts
A.________ was accused of having consumed cocaine on the one hand, and on the other hand of not having adapted the speed of his vehicle to weather conditions on November 18, 2022. This led to an accident. The lower court convicted him in this context of negligent simple violation of traffic rules as well as an offense under the Narcotics Act. The appellant challenged the conviction regarding the traffic violation, particularly alleging a violation of the principle of indictment.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_537/2025: Judgment Regarding Disability Insurance
Summary of Facts
A.________, born in 1965, registered for benefits with disability insurance after a riding accident. The IV office Basel-Landschaft conducted investigations and granted her a fixed quarter pension from July 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019, but denied a further pension. The Basel-Landschaft Cantonal Court granted her a fixed half pension for the same period but denied pension entitlement from April 1, 2019. With an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, A.________ requested the granting of a half pension also beyond March 31, 2019, or alternatively a remand for supplementary investigation.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_578/2025: Contribution Benefits for Mandatory Health Insurance
Summary of Facts
The dispute concerns contribution benefits for mandatory health insurance. By decision of June 12, 2025, the Service de l'assurance-maladie (SAM) granted A.________ a full premium reduction contribution for January and February 2025, partly for March and April 2025, and no support for the subsequent period. The complaint filed by A.________ against this was declared inadmissible by the Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève on August 14, 2025.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_830/2023: Coercion and Disturbance of Operations Serving the Public
Summary of Facts
The appellant, A.________, participated on June 20, 2020, in an unauthorized climate demonstration by the group “Extinction Rebellion” on the Quaibrücke in Zurich. This led to the closure of road and tram traffic. A.________ stood on the roadway of the Quaibrücke for at least 41 minutes holding a placard and was a member of “Doctors for XR.” The District Court of Zurich initially acquitted A.________. On appeal by the public prosecutor, the Zurich Cantonal Court convicted her of coercion (Art. 181 SCC) and disturbance of operations serving the public (Art. 239 SCC).
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_25/2026: Decision on the Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of Facts
An appellant (A.________) filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court against the decision of the lower court confirming a non-prosecution decision of the public prosecutor of the Canton of Ticino. The appellant requested the transfer of the entire case file to Italian authorities. The lower court found that the facts were of a civil law nature, which did not indicate any criminally relevant acts.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_984/2025: Violation of the Cantonal Advertising Law
Summary of Facts
On November 4, 2021, A.________ posted posters on street lamp posts without the required permit. This violates the law on advertising in the Canton of Fribourg (RekG/FR). The first-instance criminal proceedings ended with a conviction and a fine of CHF 300.–. Both the lower court (Fribourg Cantonal Court) and the first appellate court confirmed the conviction. A.________ appealed the judgment, inter alia, invoking freedom of expression and lack of consent obligations on public property.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_606/2025: Judgment on Tax Law Issues
Summary of Facts
The A.________ SA, a company registered in Geneva, was subject to several tax proceedings for the tax periods 2010 to 2013. Among other things, the tax treatment of interest on a loan taken out in connection with a corporate acquisition ("debt push down") was at issue. After a merger with a special purpose vehicle, the debts were transferred to the company. The tax authorities also denied the tax recognition of interest for the part of the loan that did not serve the renovation of the company's real estate assets, citing lack of business justification. Furthermore, the issue of statute of limitations for tax claims for 2010 was raised.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_18/2026: Judgment on Daily Allowance Entitlement in Accident Insurance
Summary of Facts
The respondent was insured as a kindergarten teacher against occupational and non-occupational accidents. After a tick-borne encephalitis infection following a tick bite, AXA initially approved daily allowances for total incapacity to work but later reduced them citing a 50% incapacity based on an administrative expert report. The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich ordered the obtaining of a court expert report confirming total incapacity. Subsequently, the lower court ordered AXA to continue paying daily allowances for 100% incapacity. AXA appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_899/2025: Kidnapping of Minors; Arbitrariness
Summary of Facts
The appellant, A.________, was sentenced by the District Court La Côte to 20 months imprisonment (partially suspended) and a fine of CHF 1,000 for kidnapping minors. The offense occurred in the context of parental visitation rights: A.________ refused to hand over his two minor children to the custodial mother and took them to Spain contrary to court orders. During the flight, he employed methods indicating planning and concealment, such as removal of SIM cards, use of false license plates, and false statements to the police.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_608/2024: Building Permit in the Zone for Horticulture and Vegetable Cultivation
Summary of Facts
The appeal is against the building permit of F.________ SA for the construction of a building with 24 studios for seasonal staff on a parcel in the zone for horticulture and vegetable cultivation in Yverdon-les-Bains. The lower courts approved the building project, with differing opinions regarding zoning conformity and the legal classification of the affected zone. The appellants submitted several arguments including disregard of federal requirements under the Spatial Planning Act, especially Articles 16a and 18 LAT.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_297/2025: Taxation of a Real Estate Gain in Connection with the Sale of an Agricultural Property
Summary of Facts
The case centers on the taxation of a gain from the sale of an agricultural parcel (parcel no. zzz) in the Canton of Geneva, originally owned by A.A.________ and his brother. After a sales intent declaration concluded in 2014 between the owners and the Canton of Geneva, the parcel was formally transferred under various suspensive conditions in 2015/2016. Later, the cantonal tax administration decided not to treat the gain as a tax-privileged gain from the sale of agricultural property (Art. 18 para. 4 DBG) because at the time of sale it was no longer considered agricultural property under the law.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_713/2025: Appeal Regarding Attempted Aggravated Bodily Injury, Sentencing and Expulsion
Summary of Facts
The youth prosecutor of the Horgen district convicted A.________ of attempted aggravated bodily injury and robbery among other charges. He was sentenced to 20 months imprisonment, a fine and a measure for young adults; expulsion was waived. The Zurich Cantonal Court overturned the conviction on one charge, increased the prison sentence to 27 months, ordered expulsion with SIS notification, and no longer ordered measures. The appellant demands acquittal of attempted aggravated bodily injury, a milder sentence, waiver of expulsion, and compensation.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_981/2025: Judgment on the Application for Waiver of Court Costs Regarding Modification of Child Support Contributions
Summary of Facts
A.________ requested the reduction of child support contributions for his daughter before the Regional Court Engiadina Bassa/Val Müstair, which was rejected. At the same time, he applied for waiver of court costs in an appeal to the Graubünden Cantonal Court. By order of October 15, 2025, the court dismissed the application, after which A.________ appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_361/2025: Judgment on the Revision of a Suva Objection Decision Regarding Accident Insurance
Summary of Facts
A.________ suffered a significant hand injury on August 22, 2022, while working as a construction worker. After surgery and rehabilitation, Suva ceased payment of medical and daily allowance benefits as of September 30, 2023, and denied entitlement to a disability pension and integrity compensation by objection decision of May 28, 2024. The Social Insurance Court of Basel-Stadt dismissed the complaint by A.________, who then brought the matter to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_459/2025: Dismissal of the Appeal Regarding Daily Allowance Insurance
Summary of Facts
The appellant (A.________) was insured against loss of earnings due to illness with her employer B.________ SA from October 11, 2021. After total incapacity to work was certified from March 2023, she demanded payment of daily allowances from the insurer. A dispute arose over the amount and duration of daily allowance payments, especially after termination of the employment relationship on July 31, 2023.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_122/2025: Permit Requirement for Demonstrations on National Roads
Summary of Facts
On July 18, 2023, A.________ applied to the Federal Department of Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC) for a permit to hold a demonstration on a section of the N01 motorway, which would have required its closure. The aim was to protest against the increase in motorway capacity. The Federal Roads Office (FEDRO) refused the permit on September 28, 2023, and an appeal to the Federal Administrative Court (FAC) was dismissed on January 21, 2025. A.________ brought the case before the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5F_6/2026: Judgment on the Inadmissibility of a Request for Revision
Summary of Facts
The petitioner filed a request for revision against a judgment of the Federal Supreme Court (5A_1104/2025) dated January 21, 2026. Among other things, she challenged the signature of a court clerk on interim orders and requested waiver of court costs amounting to CHF 1,500.–. The Federal Supreme Court had not dealt with the appeal in the original proceedings and explicitly did not respond to critical objections against interim orders.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_244/2026: Pre-Trial Detention and Grounds for Detention
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ has been in pre-trial detention since September 21, 2025, due to serious allegations including attempted intentional homicide and qualified violations of the Narcotics Act. His detention was last extended on January 20, 2026. A request for release was denied by the coercive measures court of the Canton of Aargau. The cantonal final appeal to the Aargau Cantonal Court was also dismissed on February 3, 2026. With a criminal appeal, A.________ requests immediate release and alternatively substitute measures from the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_164/2026: Judgment on Procedural Requirement in a Social Assistance Procedure
Summary of Facts
The appellant appealed against the decision of the social assistance authority of Arbon, confirmed by the Department of Finance and Social Affairs Thurgau. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Thurgau did not admit the cantonal appeal because no payment of the advance costs was made and no valid cost exemption application was filed.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_387/2025: Judgment on VAT Liability in Kind Sponsoring and Beverage Supply Contracts
Summary of Facts
A VAT group, consisting of a company manufacturing and distributing beer and beverages and a group member specialized in hospitality trade, has been registered in the VAT register since 2013. Following a control by the Federal Tax Administration (FTA), additional claims were made for the tax periods 2016 to 2020, among others due to "kind sponsoring" and loans such as tap systems in beverage supply contracts. The taxable party disputed the qualification of these loans as taxable services and argued they were mere ancillary services or marketing measures. After the Federal Administrative Court, the case was brought before the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_77/2026: Non-Admittance of an Appeal Regarding a Recusal Request
Summary of Facts
The appellant filed a recusal request against a judge and a request for revision in several proceedings before the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Supervisory Authority Basel-Landschaft. The Basel-Landschaft Cantonal Court did not admit the requests on January 13, 2026, due to lack of advance costs. The appellant appealed this decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_194/2026: Change of Residence of the Child after Domestic Violence
Summary of Facts
After a case of domestic violence, the KESB Region Solothurn decided to approve the child's change of residence to Colombia, grant sole custody to the mother, and regulate personal contact between father and child. The appellant, the father, unsuccessfully challenged this decision before the Administrative Court of the Canton of Solothurn. He then appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_922/2025: Conviction and Sentencing in Multiple Rape and Sexual Coercion
Summary of Facts
A.A.________ was charged with multiple rape, multiple sexual coercion, and various other offenses (including threats, coercion, forgery). The Aargau Cantonal Court partially discontinued the proceedings (e.g., regarding allegations barred by time or lack of evidence). It convicted A.A.________ of multiple rape, multiple sexual coercion, several assaults and insults. It imposed a prison sentence of 7 years, expulsion for 10 years, a fine and a penalty, and ordered payment of compensation to the private plaintiff. A.A.________ requested full acquittal, annulment of the sentence and expulsion, and alleged violations of his defense rights and the acceleration requirement.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_245/2026: Judgment on the Appeal Due to Denial and Delay of Justice in Enforcement Proceedings
Summary of Facts
The appellant filed a complaint of delay of justice against the Menziken Debt Enforcement Office in connection with enforcement proceedings. After the Kulm District Court rejected his request for a super-provisional injunction and forwarded the complaint to the Debt Enforcement Office, the appellant brought the matter before the Aargau Cantonal Court. Subsequently, he filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on March 16, 2026.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
1C_266/2024: Building Permit for Agricultural Hangar
Summary of Facts
The dispute concerns the issuance of a building permit for the construction of an agricultural hangar for storing potatoes on a parcel in the agricultural zone of the municipality of Suscévaz. The applicant B.________, a farmer, had purchased the parcel and carried out works without approval. The competent cantonal authorities had issued the special permit, which was challenged by the municipality of Suscévaz and a neighbor, A.________. The lower court, the Vaud Cantonal Court, dismissed the complaints of the municipality and the neighbor and referred the matter back to the municipality for reassessment.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1427/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal Against Dismissal Order
Summary of Facts
The appellant challenged the decision of the Zurich Cantonal Court, which dismissed her appeal against the dismissal order of the See/Oberland Public Prosecutor’s Office (or partially did not admit it). The Federal Supreme Court examined the criminal appeal filed on December 17, 2025 (timely filed), but found that the submission did not meet the statutory reasoning requirements.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_113/2026: Non-Admittance of an Appeal Due to Denial of Justice
Summary of Facts
The appellant filed an appeal against the decision of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich, which did not admit his submission because it declared itself incompetent. The appellant claimed that his constitutional right to legal protection (Art. 29a BV) had been denied.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_996/2023: Federal Supreme Court Judgment on the Climate Demonstration on the Quaibrücke in Zurich
Summary of Facts
The District Court Zurich originally acquitted A.________ of the charges of coercion under Art. 181 SCC and disturbance of operations serving the public (Art. 239 para. 1 SCC). On appeal by the public prosecutor, the Zurich Cantonal Court convicted A.________ of these offenses and imposed a conditional fine. The background was an unauthorized climate demonstration organized by the group "Extinction Rebellion" in June 2020 on the Quaibrücke in Zurich, which significantly affected traffic and public transport.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_205/2026: Takeover of Guardianship and Placement of a Child
Summary of Facts
The appellant, the mother, challenges a decision of the Peace Court of the Sense district, which, upon her return to the region, resumed existing guardianship and measures under Art. 308 para. 1 and 2 and Art. 325 ZGB. This included, among others, withdrawal of the right to determine the child's residence, placement in a children's home, and regulation of personal contact. The Fribourg Cantonal Court did not admit the mother's appeal as it was insufficiently reasoned and primarily directed against past measures by Bernese authorities. The mother then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court, including a request for determination of constitutional violations and annulment of the placement.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_127/2026: Judgment on Non-Admission of the Appeal
Summary of Facts
A.________ filed an appeal against a decision of the Zurich Cantonal Court which did not admit his appeal and cross-appeal. The appellant criticized the lower court regarding the question of appeal and made various far-reaching demands exceeding the subject matter. He also filed a recusal request against the investigating judge in the Federal Supreme Court proceedings.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
9C_298/2025: Tax Treatment of Gain from the Sale of an Agricultural Parcel in the Canton of Geneva
Summary of Facts
A.A.________ and his brother, co-owners of an agricultural parcel in the Canton of Geneva (parcel no. xxx), sold it in 2016 to the Canton of Geneva. The parcel had previously been released from agricultural use (desequestration by the CFA). The tax authorities levied income taxes on the gain from this sale, which the taxpayer contested based on an alleged tax privilege for agricultural properties. The taxpayer challenged the decisions of the cantonal authorities up to the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1343/2025: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of Facts
A.________ filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on December 8, 2025, against a decision of the Chambre pénale de recours of the Cour de justice of the Canton of Geneva dated October 30, 2025. In this decision, the appellant's request to disqualify the prosecutor Olivia Dilonardo was dismissed.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_94/2026: Inadmissibility of the Appeal
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ was sued by B.________ for a claim of CHF 8,600.–, against which A.________ lodged an objection. On January 15, 2026, he appealed this enforcement, after which the Bern Cantonal Court as supervisory authority in enforcement and bankruptcy matters did not admit the appeal on January 20, 2026. The appellant then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court on January 30, 2026.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1329/2025: Non-Admittance of the Appeal
Summary of Facts
A.________ filed a criminal complaint against B.________ for forgery. The public prosecutor subsequently stayed the proceedings, which A.________ contested. His appeal against the rejection of the lifting of the stay was not dealt with by the Aargau Cantonal Court due to failure to provide security. A.________ filed a criminal appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_200/2025: Disability Assessment
Summary of Facts
A.________ (born 1961) suffered a work accident in 2016, which resulted in multiple medical interventions and professional reintegration measures. The Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund (CNA) found that from September 2020 full capacity for suitable work existed and denied a pension. Disability insurance granted only time-limited pension payments. This led to a final procedure in which A.________ requested an unlimited full pension from November 1, 2017.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7F_40/2025: Inadmissibility of the Revision
Summary of Facts
The appellant A.________ requested the revision of the decision of the Federal Supreme Court (7B_505/2025) of August 18, 2025, which had declared his appeal inadmissible. As justification, A.________ cited new facts which he believed could influence the original decision.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_1063/2025: Federal Supreme Court Order on Dismissal of Proceedings Due to Mootness
Summary of Facts
The bank B.________ initiated enforcement proceedings against the appellant. The appellant filed a complaint against the payment order, which was rejected by the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Supervisory Authority Basel-Landschaft. During the proceedings before the Federal Supreme Court, the enforcement was withdrawn, rendering the proceedings moot.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_728/2025: Judgment on the Transfer of a Child to the Small Class
Summary of Facts
The appeal is against the decision of the Administrative Court of the Canton of St. Gallen, which confirmed the assignment of a child (C.A., born 2015) from the regular class to the small class. C.A., who entered the school system on August 1, 2019, was given special education support due to significant deficits (especially in language, social/emotional development, and cognitive abilities). The lower court relied on a school psychological expert report and found the small class more appropriate. The parents sought to remain in the regular class.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1095/2025: Judgment on Non-Admittance and Delay of Justice as well as Formal Requirements of Appeals
Summary of Facts
The A.________ GmbH in liquidation, represented by the former managing director B.________, filed appeals before the Federal Supreme Court concerning delay of justice and non-admission orders by the public prosecutors in the cantons of Schaffhausen and Thurgau. The appeals concerned both rejected reinstatement requests and the refusal by the cantonal courts of these cantons to admit respective appeals. The submissions were signed by B.________, whose authority to represent was again questioned.
Full summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.