Latest Judgments of the Federal Supreme Court
Here you will find the most recent judgments of the Federal Supreme Court (BGer) from bger.ch. For the first three judgments, we present you with detailed summaries including facts, considerations, and dispositives. For the further judgments, you will find a summary of the facts in each case. The complete summaries of all judgments are available in the Lexplorer portal. There you can configure your newsletter and receive the latest judgments individually tailored to your legal fields.
8C_112/2026: Contestability of a Remand Decision in the Area of Unemployment Insurance
Summary of the Facts
The Unia Unemployment Fund demanded reimbursement from the appellant of unlawfully paid unemployment daily allowances. The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich set aside the objection decision of the respondent and remanded the case to it for recalculation and new decision. The appellant filed a complaint against this remand decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Summary of the Considerations
- **E.1:** The Social Insurance Court decided on a claim for repayment of overpaid unemployment daily allowances. - **E.2.1:** Remand decisions are considered interlocutory decisions unless the remand leaves the lower court no discretion; here, it is a classic remand decision. - **E.2.2:** According to Art. 93 para. 1 BGG, complaints against interlocutory decisions are generally admissible only in exceptional cases (due to an imminent irreparable disadvantage or to shorten an extensive procedure). - **E.2.3:** The appellant did not explain to what extent the conditions for contesting this remand decision are met. - **E.2.4:** The appellant herself requested further fact-finding, which precludes proceeding with the complaint under Art. 93 para. 1 lit. b BGG. - **E.2.5:** The complaint is inadmissible and insufficiently reasoned. There will be non-admittance in the simplified procedure.
Summary of the Dispositive
The Federal Supreme Court did not take up the complaint and imposed the court costs on the appellant. Furthermore, the relevant parties were informed.
8C_500/2025: Recognition of an Occupational Disease pursuant to Art. 9 UVG
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, managing director of a GmbH, was compulsorily insured with Suva against accidents and occupational diseases. Due to persistent back complaints since 2020 with work incapacity from October 2021, he applied for benefits due to an occupational disease. Suva denied any entitlement, as the conditions for an occupational disease were not met. The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich confirmed the rejection of benefits. The appellant requested in his complaint to the Federal Supreme Court that Suva be obliged to provide benefits.
Summary of the Considerations
- **E.1**: A complaint in public law matters requires a legal violation according to Arts. 95 and 96 BGG. The Federal Supreme Court reviews the submissions within its scope of review pursuant to Arts. 97 para. 2 and 105 para. 3 BGG.
- **E.2**: The dispute is whether the lower court violated federal law by denying recognition of an occupational disease pursuant to Art. 9 para. 2 UVG and the related obligation of Suva to provide benefits. A listed disease pursuant to Art. 9 para. 1 UVG was not claimed.
- **E.3**: The lower court correctly set out the legal bases, to which reference is made.
- **E.4**: The facts were assessed based on the medical evaluations of the Suva physician Dr. med. C.________. The damage to the cervical spine (C6 to C8) was not predominantly likely caused by occupational activity. The appellant did not belong to the group typically affected by shoulder strains that trigger occupational diseases.
- **E.4.2.1**: It could be established that the appellant regularly carried loads on his back, but not on his shoulders, which speaks against an occupational cause of the complaints.
- **E.4.2.2**: The appellant could not raise justified doubts about the medical assessments, and the lower court’s evaluation was in accordance with federal law.
- **E.5**: The complaint is dismissed without an exchange of briefs due to obvious lack of merit in the simplified procedure pursuant to Art. 109 para. 2 lit. a and para. 3 BGG.
Summary of the Dispositive
The complaint was dismissed and the court costs were imposed on the appellant. The judgment was communicated to the relevant parties.
8C_217/2025: Judgment Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV
Summary of the Facts
The spouses B.A.________ (deceased in April 2020) and A.A.________ applied in 2019 for supplementary benefits (EL) to AHV/IV. The Social Insurance Institution of the Canton of St. Gallen denied the benefits both for the periods before and after the husband's death. After several decisions of the lower courts and objections, the Federal Supreme Court ultimately dealt with the disputed benefit claims for the years 2019 to 2022 and the handling of an alleged asset waiver.
Summary of the Considerations
E.1: Consolidation of proceedings 8C_217/2025 and 8C_229/2025 due to identical facts and similar legal questions. E.2: Presentation of the legal standard of review in complaints in public law matters according to the Federal Supreme Court Act (BGG), especially the scope of review and the requirements for establishing facts. E.3: Points of dispute: Claims for supplementary benefits for (1) September 2019 to April 2020 (spouses) and (2) from May 2020 (A.A.________). E.4: Application of old law until the end of 2020; from January 2021, the new law (EL reform) applies, depending on existing entitlement at the time of the reform's effective date. E.5-E.7: Examination of the asset waiver: payments to the son (total CHF 91,000) and a cash withdrawal of CHF 200,000 (without proven use) were counted as waived assets. The calculation of the countable asset surplus was done differently by the lower courts, which the Federal Supreme Court partly corrected. E.9: The entitlement claims from May 2020 were reduced or excluded, since the remaining assets, even after deducting the annual reduction, exceeded the legal limit. E.10: Cost and compensation regulation between the parties considering the respective winning and losing.
Summary of the Dispositive
The proceedings were consolidated, and the complaint of A.A.________ was partially upheld. The claims for the period from May 2020 were confirmed, and a cost allocation as well as party compensation were ordered.
5A_576/2025: Decision on Custody and Maintenance Obligations
Summary of the Facts
The parties A.A.________ (appellant) and B.A.________ (respondent) were married since 2013 and have two children in common. After the parties separated, the district court ordered measures to protect the marital community, including assigning custody of the younger child (D.A.________) to the mother and alternating custody for the older child (C.A.________). The appellant requested suspensive effect for his appeal against the first-instance decision, particularly concerning certain provisions on custody, visitation rights, living arrangements, and maintenance obligations. The cantonal court refused the suspensive effect, after which the appellant filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
5A_87/2026: Measures to Protect the Marital Community
Summary of the Facts
The British spouses A.A. (mother) and B.A. (father) have two minor children, C.A. (born 2017) and D.A. (born 2022). The family lived in Switzerland since 2023 but separated at the beginning of 2025. By decision of the Geneva first-instance court on 10.12.2025, custody and legal domicile of the children were assigned to the mother, and the relocation of the children to Great Britain was approved. The father filed an urgent request at the cantonal level on 17.12.2025 to suspend the relocation permit. The cantonal authority confirmed the suspensive effect on 24.12.2025, after which the mother filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_572/2025: Claim for Debt Discharge
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ SA (appellant) filed a claim against B.________ SA (respondent) for debt discharge in the amount of CHF 1,320,642, which was dismissed by the first-instance Geneva court on March 25, 2025. Subsequently, the appellant requested exemption from the advance payment of court costs before the Cour de justice of the Canton of Geneva. The corresponding refusal was legally challenged before the Cour de justice, but the cantonal legal remedy was unsuccessful.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_541/2025: Partial Granting of the Complaint
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ was convicted by the District Court of Broye and Nord Vaud on October 1, 2024, of multiple qualified minor bodily injuries, qualified threats, and coercion. The sentence was set at a conditional imprisonment of nine months and a fine of CHF 3,000. The lower court, the Criminal Appeals Court of the Vaud Cantonal Court, later reduced the cost share and awarded the injured party B.________ CHF 5,000 for non-material damages suffered. The appellant appealed these decisions to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_998/2025: Judgment on Employment of Foreigners without Permit
Summary of the Facts
The Federal Supreme Court deals with the complaint of A.A.________, who challenges a judgment of the cantonal appellate authority. A.A.________ was convicted for employing foreigners without a permit (Art. 117 para. 1 LEI). He demands acquittal and reimbursement of his attorney fees for the first and second instances. The lower courts found that A.A.________, as administrator of B.________ SA, employed three persons without the required work permits: his brother, a Jordanian citizen, and two Colombian citizens. The complaint criticizes, among other things, the assessment of evidence, the right to be heard, and the application of the principle in dubio pro reo.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_570/2025: Inadmissibility of Appeal and Rejection of Legal Aid
Summary of the Facts
A corporation (A.________ SA) seeks to be released from the debt obligation to another company (B.________ SA) in the amount of CHF 3,224,999. After the first-instance court dismissed its claim, it filed an appeal. During the appeal proceedings, A.________ SA applied for legal aid, which was denied by the cantonal authorities. Finally, the Cour de justice declared the cantonal appeal of A.________ SA inadmissible. A.________ SA filed a complaint against this decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_525/2025: Recovery of Covid-19 Hardship Aid by the Canton of Geneva
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ SA (formerly B.________ SA), a company in the bakery, food, and gastronomy sector with sales of over 5 million Swiss francs, received hardship aid from the Canton of Geneva in 2021 and 2022 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2022, the canton informed A.________ SA about a possible recovery of part of the financial support. The amount of CHF 701,917 was claimed back by the canton in 2023 and challenged through various appeals up to the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1170/2025: Judgment Regarding Unlocking and Mirroring of Data Carriers
Summary of the Facts
The Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Basel-Stadt is conducting criminal proceedings for multiple offenses against the Narcotics Act (BetmG). As part of a mutual legal assistance request, data carriers were seized and unlocking as well as mirroring were requested by the Public Prosecutor's Office. The Coercive Measures Court of Basel-Stadt approved this request by order. The mirrored and encrypted data carriers were provisionally sealed. A request by the Public Prosecutor's Office to disclose the passwords belonging to the encrypted data carriers was granted by the Coercive Measures Court. The appellant filed a complaint against this, which was not heard at the cantonal instance due to lack of jurisdiction and was forwarded to the Federal Supreme Court. The Federal Supreme Court reviewed jurisdiction and the prerequisites for legal remedies and dealt with confidentiality reasons and sealing procedures.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_967/2024: Fraud and Driving Without Authorization
Summary of the Facts
A.________ was convicted by the District Court Bülach of fraud as well as intentional driving without authorization and driving without a license to a conditional fine of 150 daily rates of CHF 30 each and a fine of CHF 500. The Zurich Cantonal Court confirmed the convictions for fraud and driving without authorization in one case but acquitted A.________ of further driving offenses. The imposed sentence remained unchanged. A.________ requested a full acquittal before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_718/2025: Judgment of the Federal Supreme Court 6B_718/2025
Summary of the Facts
A.A., sole proprietor, concluded a Covid-19 loan agreement on March 31, 2020, granting him a purpose-bound loan of CHF 35,000 to secure the ongoing liquidity of his business. A.A. was accused of having improperly transferred CHF 19,953 of this amount to a private account and later used it for non-business purposes. In a first-instance judgment of the Geneva Police Court, he was convicted of breach of trust (Art. 138 No. 1 para. 2 SCC); the appellate authority reduced the penalty but confirmed the guilt.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_688/2023: Judgment on the Complaint Concerning Negligent Serious Bodily Injury and Violation of Construction Rules
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, suffered a fall from a height of 4.5 meters in 2015 during construction work while installing concreting platforms attached to the inside of a wall formwork, resulting in permanent serious injuries and disability. The respondents B.________ and C.________, the responsible foremen, were accused of having neglected safety regulations by carrying out the concreting work on an insufficiently secured structure. Civil law claims of the appellant were also asserted.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_1186/2025: Complaint Concerning the Allegation of Formal Denial of Justice Related to Non-Acceptance of an Appeal Statement
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court regarding alleged formal denials of justice after the lower court rejected his appeal statement dated October 3, 2025, on the grounds that no reasoned judgment of the first-instance court existed. Among other things, A.________ requested the retroactive registration of his appeal statement and pointed to various alleged violations of constitutional and procedural guarantees. The first-instance court, the Tribunal de police in Geneva, acquitted A.________ on August 20, 2025, and discontinued proceedings regarding some allegations. On October 3, 2025, A.________ filed an appeal statement, which was rejected as premature by the lower court (Chambre pénale d'appel et de révision, Geneva) on October 7, 2025. On October 31, 2025, A.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court alleging violations of the right to be heard and formal denials of justice.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_436/2025: Right to Inspect Files in a Patent Examination Procedure
Summary of the Facts
A patent attorney requested access to the files of a completed procedure regarding the supplementary protection certificate (SPC) for pharmaceuticals, especially the legal briefs from the complaint proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court and the Federal Supreme Court. The Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) refused to release the legal briefs. The Federal Administrative Court confirmed this decision. The patent attorney filed a civil complaint aiming to obtain access to the files.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_184/2026: Request for Release from Custody and Extension of Pretrial Detention
Summary of the Facts
A.________ is accused of committing domestic violence against his wife and children and of issuing a death threat. After being re-arrested in August 2025, pretrial detention was ordered and several contact and area bans were imposed. Upon the appellant's request for release from custody, the responsible lower court ordered the extension of detention until February 19, 2026. A.________ filed a complaint against this decision and requested his release under substitute measures.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_913/2024: Embezzlement of Assets and Official Seizure
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, former board member of a company, was convicted of embezzlement of assets within the meaning of Art. 169 SCC due to dispositions over income from real estate, which were subject to judicial forced administration in the context of a mortgage debt enforcement. The forced administration was established after mortgage interest of over 1 million francs was not paid. The appellant filed a complaint against the cantonal conviction.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_961/2025: Inadmissibility of Complaint Against Conviction for Gang and Commercial Theft
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ was convicted in connection with several break-ins into cellars in Fribourg committed between early 2023 and June 2023, among other things, for gang and commercial theft. He challenged his conviction as well as the ordered expulsion from the country before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_4/2026: Family Reunification and Residence Permit
Summary of the Facts
A Peruvian national (A.A.), divorced from a Spanish national with an EU/EFTA settlement permit, applied for family reunification for his two minor daughters. Previously, in his applications to the migration authorities, he had concealed the existence of his daughters and the cohabitation with the mother of his children. The cantonal migration office refused to renew his residence permit and to issue residence permits for the two children and ordered their expulsion. The cantonal instances dismissed the complaints filed against these decisions.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_301/2025: Upholding a Complaint Against the Refusal of a Taxi Concession
Summary of the Facts
The A.________ Sàrl, a taxi company, applied for three new taxi concessions in the municipality of Payerne after an invitation to tender. The required criminal record extract was missing from their application but was submitted later and was not blank. The company was then denied the concession, which was allocated to other companies. A prior appeal to the Tribunal cantonal of the Canton of Vaud was unsuccessful.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_31/2026: Inadmissibility of the Complaint
Summary of the Facts
The appellant (A.________) requested the reinstatement of the deadline to submit an appeal statement against his conviction for repeated fraud and repeated forgery before the lower court. The lower court rejected the request.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_6/2026: Dismissal of the Complaint Due to Violation of Article 33 Paragraph 1 Letter a LArm
Summary of the Facts
The appellant was convicted of a violation of Article 33 paragraph 1 letter a LArm. On November 1, 2022, he threatened two motorcyclists at a rest area with a soft air pistol model (Beretta replica). The appellant attempted to give the impression that it was a real weapon. He also violated the reporting obligations regarding the possession of such a weapon. The lower courts confirmed based on the facts that the soft air weapon could be mistaken for a real weapon due to its appearance.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4D_253/2025: Inadmissibility of the Complaint
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed a complaint against a decision of the Zurich Cantonal Court, which rejected her request for suspensive effect on December 19, 2025. The Federal Supreme Court requested her during the procedure to pay a cost advance of CHF 500 within a deadline. Despite an extension of the deadline, the cost advance was not paid.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_612/2025: Judgment on the Precautionary Closure of a Dental Practice
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, a dental practice, repeatedly carried out treatments despite lacking a permit and stored expired medicines and medical products. After an inspection, the Health Professionals Authority of the Canton of Appenzell Ausserrhoden ordered the precautionary closure of the practice. This decision was confirmed in the lower court proceedings. The appellant filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court and alleged disproportionality of the practice closure and a violation of her economic freedom.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_18/2026: Non-Admittance of the Complaint Due to Inadmissibility
Summary of the Facts
The appellant, A.________, requested reinstatement of the deadline to file an appeal against a judgment of the Corte delle assise criminali dated September 13, 2022, which convicted him of multiple frauds and multiple forgeries. The Corte di appello e di revisione penale (CARP) of the Canton of Ticino rejected his request on December 5, 2025. He filed a complaint against this decision with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_382/2025: Decision on Recurrence Issue and Causality
Summary of the Facts
The insured A.________ suffered an injury to his left knee in a work accident on 13.02.2018. The Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund (CNA) stopped payments as of 30.04.2020 because the health condition was considered stabilized. A later report of a recurrence illness was rejected by CNA as no health deterioration was established. The lower court confirmed CNA’s decision, which the insured challenges before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_518/2024: Judgment on State Liability and Limitation
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.A.________ rented a property to his sister, who was under asset guardianship. During the rental period, significant damage occurred to the building. The appellant claimed damages against the Canton of Basel-Landschaft based on Art. 454 ZGB and cantonal liability law. The lower court dismissed the claim due to lack of active legitimacy under Art. 454 ZGB and due to limitation according to cantonal liability law.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_999/2025: Non-Admittance of a Complaint Regarding Non-Submission of an Appeal Statement
Summary of the Facts
The Aargau Cantonal Court did not take up the appellant’s appeal because he did not submit an appeal statement within the legal deadline. The appellant then filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_37/2026: Non-Admittance of the Complaint Due to Late Appeal Registration
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a complaint against a presidential order of the Zurich Cantonal Court, I. Criminal Chamber, dated November 28, 2025, which declared his appeal against a judgment of the District Court Uster dated October 13, 2025, late and did not take it up. The core of the Federal Supreme Court proceedings was only the question of timeliness of the appeal registration, which the appellant did not substantively address.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_822/2025: Non-Initiation
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ filed a criminal complaint against his former supervisor and an HR employee of his former employer, B.________ AG. He accused them of refusing to pay 24.5 vacation days for further training, which he considered a compulsory training as a prospective European patent attorney. The public prosecutor's office did not initiate a criminal investigation; the Zurich Cantonal Court dismissed the complaint against this decision. A.________ requested the annulment of the decision and referral back to the lower court or public prosecutor's office in the Federal Supreme Court proceedings.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_749/2025: Conviction for Qualified Assault and Sexual Violence
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.A.________ was convicted, among other things, of qualified assault, insult, violation of privacy, coercion, sexual coercion, rape, and other offenses. In Spain and other locations, he exercised physical and psychological violence against his wife between 2014 and 2023, controlled, injured, and threatened her, including to force sexual acts. The lower court confirmed the conviction by the District Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
8C_456/2025: Decision Regarding Accident Insurance Law (Causality)
Summary of the Facts
The appellant A.________ fell in a traffic accident on 26.09.2017, sustaining an injury (sprained foot) covered by the Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund (CNA). Later complaints (pain in the left shoulder, psychological complaints) were not recognized by CNA because no causal connection to the accident was seen. The lower court (Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Geneva) dismissed the appellant's objection against CNA's denial.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_300/2024: Sentencing in Case of Multiple Sexual Coercion and Attempted Rape
Summary of the Facts
A.________ had a volatile relationship with C.________ from 2018 to 2019. He is accused of committing various offenses against the victim C.________ and her new partner B.________ between December 2018 and March 2020, including secretly filming sexual acts, multiple threats, deprivation of liberty, use of violence, and attempted rape. The lower courts, especially the Zurich Cantonal Court, found him guilty and imposed sanctions. A.________ challenges the decision before the Federal Supreme Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
7B_896/2024: Non-Admittance of a Complaint Regarding the Discontinuation of Proceedings for Defamation Offenses
Summary of the Facts
A.A.________ filed a criminal complaint against his wife B.A.________ for alleged defamation and slander committed during a parent-teacher meeting. The public prosecutor's office discontinued the criminal proceedings, and the complaint against this was dismissed by the Cantonal Court. By criminal complaint, A.A.________ requested continuation of the criminal investigation and an indictment.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_375/2025: Non-Admittance of the Complaint by A.________
Summary of the Facts
A.________, an Italian national, filed a complaint in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court on July 10, 2025. The complaint concerned the revocation of his previous EU/EFTA residence permit and the rejection of his request for an EU/EFTA settlement permit. The lower courts, especially the Administrative Court of the Canton of Ticino, had confirmed these decisions. During the proceedings, the appellant declared on February 5, 2026, that he was withdrawing his complaint.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
6B_972/2025: Admissibility of a Criminal Complaint
Summary of the Facts
The Schaffhausen Cantonal Court acquitted the accused person (B.________) of the charge of slander, but convicted her of disobedience to official orders, imposing a fine of CHF 500 (or substitute imprisonment of 5 days). The appellant (private plaintiff) filed a criminal complaint against this judgment with the Federal Supreme Court, requesting the annulment of the higher court's judgment and confirmation of the first-instance judgment (Schaffhausen Cantonal Court), which also found guilt for slander.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_362/2025: Judgment on Downgrading of a Settlement Permit Due to Integration Deficits
Summary of the Facts
A.________, a North Macedonian national with a settlement permit, was convicted multiple times and had financial and business problems since 2009, leading to bankruptcies of three companies he managed. The Zurich Migration Office revoked his settlement permit and granted him a residence permit instead, which was confirmed by the Security Directorate and the Administrative Court.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
4A_668/2025: Judgment on Non-Admittance Decision Regarding a Complaint Against Final Legal Opening
Summary of the Facts
The appellant filed a complaint against a decision of the Zurich Cantonal Court, which rejected a request for suspensive effect. The appellant did not pay the imposed cost advance within the original or extended deadline.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.
2C_609/2025: Revocation of the Settlement Permit of a Repeatedly Convicted Foreigner
Summary of the Facts
The Kosovar national A.A.________, who has lived in Switzerland for over 33 years, had his settlement permit revoked. The reasons were repeated and serious crimes between 2003 and 2019, including commercial fraud with damages over CHF 474,000 and 15 criminal convictions. A.A.________ lives in Switzerland with his wife and three children, one of whom is still a minor. Despite his long stay, he shows poor integration and does not speak German. The appellant challenges the decision of the Zurich Administrative Court on the revocation of the settlement permit and requests its maintenance or a downgrade to a residence permit.
Complete summary of the judgment can be found in the portal.